Measuring the quality of adaptive environments in instruction based on student perceptions

Zahid Zufar At Thaariq; Dedi Kuswandi; Made Duananda Kartika Degeng

doi:10.17509/jik.v21i1.62255

Measuring the quality of adaptive environments in instruction based on student perceptions

Zahid Zufar At Thaariq, Dedi Kuswandi, Made Duananda Kartika Degeng

Abstract

Adaptive learning has been identified as a means of creating a student-centered environment that is more fulfilling in multiple aspects. Such an environment prioritizes the facilitation of students' interests in learning. The present study employs quantitative research methods to measure the quality of the adaptive learning environment at Wahid Hasyim Junior High School, as perceived by 144 students, using factor analysis techniques. The findings reveal several factors that are integral to the adaptive learning environment. Firstly, student interaction is deemed crucial, emphasizing interactive and personalized elements. Secondly, teachers' course delivery of learning is determined by design, models, strategies, and resources, with media use having a lesser impact. Thirdly, contextualized content and engaging instructional techniques are key factors in discovering and organizing learning materials. Finally, collaboration support is recognized as an essential factor. These conclusions can inform educational improvement initiatives at Wahid Hasyim Junior High School.

Abstrak

Pembelajaran adaptif telah diidentifikasi sebagai cara untuk menciptakan lingkungan yang berpusat pada peserta didik yang lebih memuaskan dalam berbagai aspek. Lingkungan seperti ini memprioritaskan fasilitas minat peserta didik dalam belajar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif untuk mengukur kualitas lingkungan belajar adaptif di SMP Wahid Hasyim, seperti yang dipersepsikan oleh 144 peserta didik, dengan menggunakan teknik analisis faktor. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan beberapa faktor yang menjadi bagian integral dari lingkungan belajar adaptif. Pertama, interaksi peserta didik dianggap penting, dengan penekanan yang signifikan pada elemen interaktif dan personal. Kedua, penyampaian pembelajaran oleh guru ditentukan oleh desain, model, strategi, dan sumber daya, dengan penggunaan media yang memiliki dampak yang lebih kecil. Ketiga, konten yang kontekstual dan teknik pembelajaran yang menarik diidentifikasi sebagai faktor kunci dalam penemuan dan pengorganisasian materi pembelajaran. Terakhir, dukungan kolaborasi diakui sebagai faktor penting. Kesimpulan-kesimpulan ini memiliki potensi untuk menginformasikan inisiatif peningkatan pendidikan di SMP Wahid Hasyim.

Kata Kunci: Lingkungan adaptif; pembelajaran; pendidikan; persepsi peserta didik.

Keywords

Adaptive environment; education; instruction; student perceptions

Full Text:

Download PDF (English)

References

Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. Techtrends, 65(1), 62-78.

Annuš, N., Takáč, O., Štempeľová, I., & Dancsa, D. (2023). Z and alpha generation teaching methods: Digitalization of learning material. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 224-229.

Basit, A., Kasdriyanto, D. Y., Matsusitha, D., Anggila, D. S., & Rahayuningdiah, W. T. (2022). Viber is a powerful kick to support online learning during the COVID-19 period at SDIT Permata Kota Probolinggo. Gandrung: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 556-562.

Benedicto, P. N., & Andrade, R. (2022). Problem-based learning strategies and critical thinking skills among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, 2(2), 1-28.

Calancie, L., Frerichs, L., Davis, M. M., Sullivan, E., White, A. M., Cilenti, D., Corbie-Smith, G., & Lich, K. H. (2021). Consolidated framework for collaboration research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks, and principles for cross-sector collaboration. Plos One, 16(1), 1-25.

Chang, Y. H., & Chang, J. C. (2001). Quantitative design for multivariable systems with uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science, 32(3), 331-344.

Clark, R. M., Kaw, A. K., & Gomes, R. B. (2022). Adaptive learning: Helpful to the flipped classroom in the online environment of COVID-19?. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 517-531.

Despotović-Zrakić, M., Marković, A., Bogdanović, Z., Barać, D., & Krčo, S. (2012). Providing adaptivity in moodle LMS courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 326-338.

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24.

Haruna, H., Abbas, A., Zainuddin, Z., Hu, X., Mellecker, R. R., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Enhancing instructional outcomes with a serious gamified system: A qualitative investigation of student perceptions. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(6), 383-408.

Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206-217.

Jang, M., Cho, W., Yoon, N. H., Kwak, M., & Yoo, S. (2009). Identifying the types of collaboration in community health promotion. Journal of Health Education, 26(3), 125-135.

Jiang, Y., Wang, F., Liu, Z., & Chen, Z. (2022). Composite learning adaptive tracking control for full-state constrained multiagent systems without using the feasibility condition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 1(1), 1-13

Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-12.

Kuo, F. O., Yu, P. T., & Hsiao, W. H. (2013). Develop and evaluate the effects of multimodal presentation system on elementary ESL students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 29-40.

Kusworo, N. R., Soepriyanto, Y., & Husna, A. (2021). Pengembangan adaptive e-learning sistem berbasis vark learning style pada materi IP address. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 70-79.

Laroussi, M. (2012). Ontology in adaptive learning environment. Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, 12(1), 167-177.

Lerner, J., & Hâncean, M. G. (2023). Micro-level network dynamics of scientific collaboration and impact: Relational hyperevent models for the analysis of coauthor networks. Network Science, 11(1), 5-35.

McLaney, E., Morassaei, S., Hughes, L., Davies, R., Campbell, M., & Prospero, L. D. (2022). A framework for interprofessional team collaboration in a hospital setting: Advancing team competencies and behaviours. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(2), 112-117.

Murtadho, M. H., Praherdhiono, H., & Wedi, A. (2022). Pengembangan modul adaptif untuk melayani keanekaragaman gaya belajar berbasis universal design for learning. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(3), 245-253.

Mustaro, P. N., & Silveira, I. F. (2006). Learning objects: Adaptive retrieval through learning styles. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 35-46.

Napiah, N. (2022). The need analysis of ethnoscience-based English learning material: A contextual model. Eternal, 13(1), 32-38.

Normadhi, N. B. A., Shuib, L., Nasir, H. N. M., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168-190.

Novrida, D., & Refelita, F. (2021). Desain dan uji coba handout dengan pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) berbasis guided note taking pada materi laju reaksi. Journal of Chemistry Education and Integration, 1(2), 91-99.

Olmos-Gómez, M. del C. (2020). Sex and Careers of university students in educational practices as factors of individual differences in learning environment and psychological factors during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 1-19.

Paramythis, A., & Loidl-Reisinger, S. (2003). Adaptive learning environments and e-learning standards. Second European Conference on E-Learning, 1(1), 369-379.

Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168-171.

Premlatha, K. R., & Geetha, T. V. (2015). Learning content design and learner adaptation for adaptive e-learning environment: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(4), 443-465.

Rachmayanti, E. (2022). Penerapan pembelajaran adaptif mengenai konten pendidikan seksual: Studi fenomenologi. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2430-2445.

Rizaldi, D. R., Andani, Y., Doyan, A., Makhrus, M., Fatimah, Z., & Nurhayati, E. (2021). The use of Betel leaf in Nyirih tradition: Analyzing an ethnoscience-based learning material. International Journal on Education Insight, 2(1), 29-36.

Sabry, M. I., El-Foutouh, H. A., & Gouda, E. A. A. M. (2021). Interaction between presentation patterns of the infographic (static/animated) and learning styles (global/sequential) in adaptive learning environment and its effect on the development of programming skills of secondary students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(4), 15-72.

Saleem, A. N., Noori, N. M., & Ozdamli, F. (2022). Gamification applications in e-learning: A literature review. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 27(1), 139-159.

Saptiyah, S., Nulhakim, L., & Suryani, D. I. (2023). Digital science magazine based on contextual learning on the polluted river topic. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 18(3), 328-335.

Si̇ri̇pongdee, K., Pimdee, P., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2020). A blended learning model with IoT-based technology: Effectively used when the COVID-19 pandemic?. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 905-917.

Slamet, T. I., & Kuswandi, D. (2017). Developing connectivism learning in social learning platform using ADDIE instructional design model. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(2),105-118.

Soltani, A., & Izquierdo, A. (2019). Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 635-644.

Song, R., Xu, H., & Cai, L. (2019). Academic collaboration in entrepreneurship research from 2009 to 2018: A multilevel collaboration network analysis. Sustainability, 11(19), 1-17.

Sternberg, R. J. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 1-17.

Suhaimi, I., & Permatasari, F. (2021). Model pembelajaran abad 21 dan pembelajaran menulis kolaborasi. Jurnal Koulutus, 4(2), 211-223.

Surahman, E., Kuswandi, D., Wedi, A., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyanti, D. A., & Thaariq, Z. Z. A. (2019). Adaptive learning analytics management system (Alams): An innovative online learning approach. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 5(4), 413-430.

Surahman, E., & Surjono, H. D. (2017). Pengembangan adaptive mobile learning pada mata pelajaran Biologi SMA sebagai upaya mendukung proses blended learning. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 26-37.

Susilo, R. K. D. (2022). Compatibility, effectiveness, and sustainability of grass-root collaboration in promoting environmental and natural resource conservation (an evaluative analysis). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 995(1), 1-12.

Thaariq, Z. Z. A., & Surahman, E. (2021). How does educational technology answer challenges? Empirical theoretical studies and public perspectives. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn),15(3), 474-482.

Thaariq, Z. Z. A., & Wedi, A. (2020). Model Adaptive Blended Curriculum (ABC) sebagai inovasi kurikulum dalam upaya mendukung pemerataan pendidikan. Jurnal Kiprah, 8(2), 91-104.

Toktarova, V. (2022). Model of adaptive system for mathematical training of students within elearning environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(20), 99-117.

Ulfa, S., Lasfeto, D. B., & Kurniawan, C. (2020). Modelling the learner model-based ontology in adaptive learning environment. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), 1(1), 34-45.

Vandewaetere, M., Desmet, P., & Clarebout, G. (2011). The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 118-130.

Wiggins, L. L., & Shiffer, M. J. (1990). Planning with hypermedia combining text, graphics, sound, and video. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(2), 226-235.

Yang, C. H., Huang, Y., & Huang, P. (2022). A Comparison of the learning efficiency of business English between the blended teaching and conventional teaching for college students. English Language Teaching, 15(9), 44-53.

Zavodchikova, N. I., & Bykova, I. А. (2021). Refining the system of principles in teaching methodical disciplines in conditions of higher education digital transformation. Vestnik of Kostroma State University Series: Pedagogy, Psychology, Sociokinetics, 26(4), 166-173.

Zhang, S., Zhang, N., Zhu, S., & Liu, F. (2020). A foot in two camps or your undivided attention? The impact of intra- and inter-community collaboration on firm innovation performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 753-768.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i1.62255