Identification of curriculum and empirical needs for the writing BIPA 4 GBL model

Dewi Suharyanti, Suci Sundusiah, H. Halimah

Abstract


As a skill that experts place at the highest level in language acquisition, writing skills become considered the most difficult. BIPA level 4 is the initial level of complex writing according to the SKL BIPA Permendikbud No. 27 of 2017. Writing skills considered difficult should be packaged with a fun and meaningful learning model, one of which is developing a Game-based Learning model. Identifying curriculum and empirical needs is the initial stage carried out in developing Game-based Learning. This research aims to identify the curriculum and syllabus of BIPA 4 writing, which aligns with identifying empirical learning needs through field studies of BIPA teachers at home and abroad. The results showed that argumentation text is the most challenging text to learn, while the most accessible text to learn is persuasion text. In terms of grammar, the affixes me-kan, ke-an, and ter- are the most difficult languages to learn, while the most accessible grammar to learn is sentence expansion, conjunctions, rephrases, and technical terms. The results also found that BIPA 4 learners need to read texts related to Indonesian insights, including culinary, biodiversity, culture, local wisdom, and tourism.

 

Abstrak

Keterampilan menulis sebagai keterampilan yang ditempatkan para ahli pada tataran paling tinggi dalam pemerolehan bahasa menjadi sebuah keterampilan yang dianggap paling sulit. Jenjang BIPA 4 merupakan jenjang awal pembelajaran menulis yang kompleks menurut Standar Kompetensi Lulusan BIPA Permendikbud No. 27 Tahun 2017. Keterampilan menulis yang dianggap sulit sebaiknya dikemas dengan model pembelajaran yang menyenangkan dan bermakna, salah satunya dengan mengembangkan model pembelajaran berbasis game edukasi atau Game-based Learning. Identifikasi kurikulum dan kebutuhan empiris di lapangan merupakan tahap awal yang dilakukan dalam pengembangan Game-based Learning. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kurikulum dan silabus menulis BIPA 4 yang kemudian diselaraskan dengan identifikasi kebutuhan pembelajaran secara empiris melalui studi lapangan terhadap pengajar BIPA di dalam dan luar negeri. Hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa teks argumentasi merupakan teks yang paling sulit dipelajari sedangkan teks yang paling mudah dipelajari adalah teks persuasi. Dari segi kebahasaan, imbuhan me-kan, ke-an, dan ter- merupakan kebahasaan yang paling sulit dipelajari sedangkan kebahasaan yang paling mudah dipelajari adalah perluasan kalimat, kata hubung, kata ulang dan istilah teknis. Hasil penelitian juga menemukan bahwa pemelajar BIPA 4 memerlukan teks-teks bacaan yang berkaitan dengan wawasan nusantara atau wawasan ke-Indonesiaan, di antaranya yaitu kuliner, keanekaragaman hayati, budaya, kearifan lokal dan wisata.

Kata Kunci: BIPA 4; GBL; identifikasi kurikulum; kebutuhan pembelajaran empiris; keterampilan menulis


Keywords


BIPA 4; empirical learning needs; GBL; identification of curriculum; writing skill

References


Ahlan, A. (2021). Written feedback approach: An alternative way in improving learners’writing skill. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 4(1), 45-50.

Asteria, P. V., Rofiuddin, A., Suyitno, I., & Susanto, G. (2023). Indonesian-based pluricultural competence in BIPA teachers’ perspective. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 190-201.

Backlund, P., & Hendrix, M. (2018). Educational games-are they worth the effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serious games. VS-Games, (5). 1-8.

Blumberg, F. C., Deater‐Deckard, K., Calvert, S. L., Flynn, R. M., Green, C. S., Arnold, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2019). Digital games as a context for children's cognitive development: Research recommendations and policy considerations. Social Policy Report, 32(1), 1-33.

Cassell, C., & Bishop, V. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: Exploring themes, metaphors and stories. European Management Review, 16(1), 195-207.

Dereh, N. A., Suyitno, I., & Harsiati, T. (2021). Analisis kebutuhan untuk pengembangan bahan ajar membaca pemahaman bagi mahasiswa Thailand tingkat menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 6(8), 1238-1245.

Dewi, H., Alfitriyani, H. U., & Wuryaningrum, R. (2020). Analisis kebutuhan materi untuk pembelajaran BIPA di Universitas Jember. FKIP e-Proceeding, 1(1), 17-28.

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Introducing Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA): Method and challenges of teaching Indonesian as a Foreign Language (IFL). Inovasi Kurikulum, 20(2), 205-224.

Hou, H. T., Wu, C. S., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Evaluation of a mobile-based scaffolding board game developed by scaffolding-based game editor: Analysis of learners’ performance, anxiety and behavior patterns. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(2), 273-291.

Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., ... & Li, J. (2020). The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1875-1901.

Idris, M. I., Said, N. E. M., & Tan, K. H. (2020). Game-based learning platform and its effects on present tense mastery: Evidence from an ESL classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 19(5), 13-26.

Istanti, W., Andayani, A., Suwandi, S., & Saddhono, K. (2020, November). Karakteristik pemelajar asing program darmasiswa: Pengguna buku ajar bahasa Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Internasional Seminar Kepakaran Bahasa Indonesia untuk Penutur Asing (SEMAR BIPA), 3(1), 227-236.

Jiang, D., & Kalyuga, S. (2022). Learning english as a foreign language writing skills in collaborative settings: A cognitive load perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 1-11.

Jones, R. &. (2019). Linguistic structures in foreign language acquisition: A comprehensive analysis of spelling, grammar, phrasing, and sentence structure. Journal of Language Learning Research, 15(3), 210-228.

Korchi, A., Dardor, M., Messaoudi, F., & Mabrouk, E. H. (2021). Progression of a serious game difficulty from a playful and pedagogical point of view: Analyze and representation. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1333-1333.

Lappas, D., Georgios, K., & Karampelas, P. (2023). Using game-based learning in order to enhance decision making under uncertainty. International Journal of Film and Media Arts, 8(1), 36-51.

Lemaich, S. E., & Utami, S. (2022). Linguistic categorization of teacher perceptions about BIPA learner errors and learning challenges: a multiple case study. Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (JBIPA), 4(1), 9-29.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1-16.

Mashoor, B. B. N., & Abdullah, A. T. H. (2020). Error analysis of spoken English language among Jordanian secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(5), 75-82.

Mee, R. W. M., Pek, L. S., Von, W. Y., Ghani, K. A., Shahdan, T. S. T., Ismail, M. R., & Rao, Y. S. (2021). A conceptual model of analogue gamification to enhance learners' motivation and attitude. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 40-50.

Park, Y. H., Paik, T. Y., & Koo, J. H. (2019). Effect of student activity participation on accounting education. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 40-51.

Rahmawati, L. E., Suwandi, S., Saddhono, K., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Need analysis on the development of writing competency test for foreign university students. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 467-471.

Saleem, A. N., Noori, N. M., & Ozdamli, F. (2022). Gamification applications in e-learning: A literature review. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 27(1), 139-159.

Schuldt, J., & Niegemann, H. (2021). Instructional design for digital game-based learning. Game-based Learning Across the Disciplines, 23, 299-319.

Solikhah, I., & Budiharso, T. (2020). Standardizing BIPA as an international program of a language policy. Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.2), 181-205.

Tahir, S., & Bidin, S. J. (2019). Photographic documentation as a mode of data collection in qualitative research: A case of pilot testing in linguistic landscape. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(3), 266-280.

Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555.

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (2018). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57-71.

Wijaya, A. &. (2019). Curricular considerations in BIPA: A focus on text complexity and vocabulary. Journal of Language Curriculum Development, 16(4), 321-336.

Winatha, K. R., & Setiawan, I. M. D. (2020). Pengaruh game-based learning terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(3), 198-206.

Zeng, J., Parks, S., & Shang, J. (2020). To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: A review of educational games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 186-195.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i1.65868

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Dewi Suharyanti, Suci Sundusiah, Halimah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Inovasi Kurikulum
Published by Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
in collaboration with Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154


Indexed By:

SINTA   GARUDA   Crossref      DOAJ DIMENSIONS BASE   ROAD

Google Scholar

Google Scholar p. ISSN 1829-6750 | Google Scholar e. ISSN 2798-1363