Visitor Management Concept Through Carrying Capacity Analysis In Forest Recreation
Abstract
A b s t r a c t
Kawah Putih Forest Recreation (KPFR) is a tourism area with beautiful and unique scenery, functioning as biodiversity conservation and protection of Presbylis comata, an endemic primate of West Java. Because of its complex function, the use of the area for tourism should consider carrying capacity aspect. Carrying capacity is identified from three factors; those are physical carrying capacity (PCC), real carrying apacity (RCC) and effective carrying capacity (ECC). The calculation resulted from these three factors are then compared to the actual condition in KPFR. This research showed that physically the crater area of KPFR could accommodate 986 visitor/day (PCC). The result also showed that according to the specific characteristic of the area KPFR could accommodate 255 visitors/ day (RCC), while in its management capacity, the mode of local transportation in KPFR only able to carry 98 visitors/ day (ECC).
A b s t r a k
Hutan Rekreasi Kawah Putih (KPFR) merupakan kawasan wisata dengan pemandangan yang indah dan unik, berfungsi sebagai konservasi keanekaragaman hayati dan perlindungan Presbylis comata, primata endemik Jawa Barat. Karena fungsinya yang kompleks, maka pemanfaatan kawasan untuk pariwisata harus memperhatikan aspek daya dukung. Daya dukung diidentifikasi dari tiga faktor; yaitu daya dukung fisik (PCC), daya dukung nyata (RCC) dan daya dukung efektif (ECC). Hasil perhitungan dari ketiga faktor tersebut kemudian dibandingkan dengan kondisi sebenarnya di KPFR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara fisik kawasan kawah KPFR mampu menampung 986 pengunjung/hari (PCC). Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa sesuai dengan karakteristik spesifik kawasan KPFR mampu menampung 255 pengunjung/hari (RCC), sedangkan dalam kapasitas pengelolaannya, moda transportasi lokal di KPFR hanya mampu mengangkut 98 pengunjung/hari (ECC).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Butler, R. W. 2019. Tourism carrying capacity research: a perspective article. Tourism Review. Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-05-2019-0194
Chang, M and Hans G. 2012. Recreational Carrying Capacity in Hiking Trails. Three Case Study in Protected Areas in Nicaragua. Crowding and Recreation Carying Capacity: Stockholm.
Cifuentes, M.A. 1992. Determination Carring Capacity of Tourism in Protected Area.CTIE Papers, Turrialba, Costa Rica. Pp 1-19.
Douglass, R. W. (2016). Forest recreation. Elsevier.
Faiz, S A; Komalasari, R I. 2020. The assessment of tourism carrying capacity in Lombok Island. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science; Bristol Vol. 592, Iss. 1. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012002.
Environmental Science; Bristol Vol. 592, Iss. 1. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012002.
Fennel, D. 2008. Ecotourism. Taylor & Francis e-Library
Grinyuk, O. Y., Demianenko, S. O., & Kupach, T. H. 2021. Analysis of zoning schemes of the territory of Ukraine for the purposes of optimization and management of recreational and tourist activities. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 30(2), 261-274.
Hall, C. M., & Boyd, S. W. (Eds.). 2005. Nature-based tourism in peripheral areas: Development or disaster?(Vol. 21). Channel View Publications.
Hargrove, C.M. 2017. Cultural Heritage Tourism: Five Steps for Success and Sustainability. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kastolani, W & Rahmafitria, F. 2015. Model pengaturan pengunjung pada kawasan wisata alam pegunungan dengan fungsi lindung dan intensitas wisata tinggi di kawasan wisata kluster Gunung Patuha, Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal SPATIAL: Wahana Komunikasi dan Informasi Geografi. vol 14 no.2 (2015).
Leung, Y. F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, G., & Buckley, R. 2018. Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines for sustainability (Vol. 27). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN
Mandie, A & Petric L. 2021. Mediterranean Protected Areas in the Era of Overtourism: Challenges and Solutions. Germany: Springer International Publishing
Manning, R.E., 2002. How Much is Too Much? Carrying Capacity of National Parks and Protected Areas, Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas Conference Proceedings ed by A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, A. Muhar 2002, pages 306-313.
Novikov, A. V., Sumarukova, O. V., Lagutina, N. V., Evgrafov, A. V., & Rodionov, A. V. 2020, August. Aspects of recreational zoning of the forest park “Kuskovo”. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 548, No. 7, p. 072067). IOP Publishing.
Rahmafitria, F and Nanin. 2013. The Mapping of Landslide Disaster Susceptibility in Natural Tourism Area of Bandung District, West Java. The Proceedings of 1st WHTER and ICES 2013.Siam University. Bangkok
Rahmafitria, F., Purboyo, H., & Rosyidie, A. 2019. Agglomeration in tourism: the case of SEZs in regional development goals. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 35(2), 342-351.
Romeo R., Russo, L., Parisi F., Notarianni M., Manuelli S. and Carvao S., UNWTO. 2021. Mountain tourism – Towards a more sustainable path. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7884en
Sari, C.P.; Rahayu, S. 2018. Carrying Capacity of Gancik Hill Top for Ecotourism Development in Boyolali District. E3S Web Conf. 73, 02008.
Sati, V.P. 2018. Carrying capacity analysis and destination development: a case study of Gangotri tourists/pilgrims’ circuit in the Himalaya, Asia Pacific. Journal of Tourism Research. 23:3. 312-322. DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2018.1433220
Schirpke, U., Scolozzi, R., Kiessling, A., & Tappeiner, U. 2021. Recreational ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps: Preferences, visitor groups and management implications. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35, 100421.
Shackley, M. 2001. Managing Sacred Sites. London:Continuum.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jithor.v5i1.46821
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
eISSN : 2654-4687
pISSN : 2654-3893
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License