The Implementation of the STEM PBL Approach for Students with Disabilities: A Literature Review

Verra Wulandary, Norimune Kawai

Abstract


The present systematic literature review (SLR) investigates the successes and challenges associated with the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PBL) grounded in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) framework for students with disabilities. The authors meticulously analyzed nine previous studies that focus on the application of STEM PBL in both special and inclusive educational settings. The findings suggest that STEM PBL is a successful and engaging pedagogical approach that positively influences various aspects of learning for students with disabilities. While the results highlight significant improvements in learning outcomes and student conduct during the educational process, several studies concurrently report challenges inherent in implementing STEM PBL for this demographic. Consequently, further research is warranted to explore how students with disabilities engage with a STEM PBL-focused curriculum. The implications of these findings are practical for educators, providing actionable insights to develop effective STEM PBL learning designs tailored for students with disabilities.

Keywords


STEM; PBL; students with disabilities; qualitative approach; quality education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayverdi, L., & Avcu, Y. E. (2023). Design and Implementation of a STEM Activity for the Education of Students with Mild Intellectual Disabilities. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 134-158.

Barell, J. (2010). Problem-based learning: The foundation for 21st-century skills. In J, Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st-century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 175–199). Solution Tree Press.

Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. Corwin.

Buck Institute for Education. (2018). A framework for high-quality project-based learning. https://hqpbl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Frameworkfor HQPBL.pdf

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.

Capraro, M. M. (2012). The development of a teacher observation instrument for PBL classroom instruction. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3). https://jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1612/1459

Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R.M. Capraro, M.M. Capraro, & J. Morgan. (Eds.), STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–5). Brill.

Chetwynd, E. (2022). Critical analysis of reliability and validity in literature reviews. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(3), 392–396. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/08903344221100201

Ediyanto, E., Mahanani, P., Aprilia, I. D., Ramadhani, R. S., & Wulandary, V. Optimizing Inclusive Education: Uncovering Challenges and Strategies in Primary Schools Through a Literature Review. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 11(2), 385-395. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/mimbar/article/download/71803/pdf

Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford University Press.

Gollnick, D.M., & Chinn, P.C. (2002). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society (6th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Gonzales, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service. http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1089-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0

Hwang, J., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). Stemming on STEM: A STEM education framework for students with disabilities. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19(1), 39–49. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1169381.pdf

Johnstone, C. J., Schuelka, M. J., & Swadek, G. (2020). Quality education for all? The promises and limitations of the SDG framework for inclusive education and students with disabilities. In Wulff, A. (Ed), Grading goal four: Tensions, Threats, and Opportunities in the Sustainable Development Goal on Quality Education (pp. 96-115). Boston; Leiden: Brill.

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802166597

Lambie, K. (2020). Project-based learning (PBL) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Perspectives of students with special education needs (SENs) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/762f8a54f344f9b145f89d36bea9b9fa/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar

Lame, G. (2019, July). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1633–1642). Cambridge University Press.

Lu, S. Y., Wu, C. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2022). Evaluation of disabled STEAM-students’ education learning outcomes and creativity under the UN sustainable development goal: project-based learning oriented STEAM curriculum with micro: bit. Sustainability, 14(2), 679. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/679/pdf?version=1641638749

Marino, M. T., Black, A. C., Hayes, M. T., & Beecher, C. C. (2010). An analysis of factors that affect struggling readers' achievement during a technology-enhanced STEM astronomy curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 35–47. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016264341002500305

Noble, E., Ferris, K. A., LaForce, M. and Zuo, H. (2020). A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding PBL Experiences in Inclusive STEM High Schools. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/8356

Saini, M., Sengupta, E., Singh, M., Singh, H., & Singh, J. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal for Quality Education (SDG 4): A study on SDG 4 to extract the pattern of association among the indicators of SDG 4 employing a genetic algorithm. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2031-2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11265-4

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

Soares, D. A., & Vannest, K. J. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning and Teaching for Exceptional and Learners. In R.M. Capraro, M.M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-Based Learning: an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (2nd ed.) (pp. 85-98). Brill.

Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM Project-Based Learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 15–27). Sense Publishers.

Tatto, M. T. (2021). Comparative research on teachers and teacher education: global perspectives to inform UNESCO’s SDG 4 agenda. Oxford Review of Education, 47(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1842183

United Nations (UN). (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Van Saane, N., Sluiter, J. K., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., & Frings‐Dresen, M. H. (2003). Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction—a systematic review. Occupational medicine, 53(3), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg038

Wahyudi, W., & Winanto, A. (2018). Development of Project Based Blended Learning (PJB2L) to increase Pre-service Primary Teacher Creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 51(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v51i2.12795

Wulandary, V., & Kawai, N. (2024). The Efficacy of Mnemonic Strategies in Improving theBasic Multiplication Facts Retrieval. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 3(1), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i1.614

Zech, D. M. (2014). Efficacy of STEM Initiatives Utilizing Project-Based Learning with Inclusion Students in an Urban High School [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f091efbc5bef3fe7c0660a3af56f22ac/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v10i1.78865

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Journal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/WapFi/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Journal WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika).

All rights reserverd. pISSN 2338-1027 eISSN 2685-4414

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)