Past, Present and Future of Olympic Legacy in Asia
Abstract
The Olympic Games have long played a pivotal role in shaping national identity, diplomacy, and socio-political narratives, particularly in Asian contexts. From Japan’s post-WWII recovery demonstrated by the 1964 Tokyo Olympics to China’s rising global influence showcased during the 2008 and 2022 Games, the Olympics have transcended sports to become a platform for political messaging and national branding. This paper examines the evolution of the Olympic legacy in Asia, focusing on the tangible and intangible impacts on infrastructure, culture, and social values. It explores the role of the Games in urban regeneration, the promotion of soft power, and the emphasis on cultural heritage. Additionally, the paper discusses the intersection of technology and Olympic legacy, particularly the use of AI and digital platforms in preserving Olympic heritage, and the growing importance of sustainability in recent Games. By analyzing the political, cultural, and technological dimensions of the Olympics, this study underscores the Games' broader significance beyond athletic competition. It also highlights challenges, such as the underutilization of Olympic venues and the preservation of intangible cultural heritage. Future research should explore how these intersections of technology, culture, and diplomacy will shape the ongoing legacy of the Olympics in Asia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bairner, A. (2001). Sport, nationalism, and globalization: European and North American perspectives. Suny Press.
Brady, A. M. (2009). Marketing dictatorship: Propaganda and thought work in contemporary China. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Cashman, R. (2003). What is Olympic legacy? University of New South Wales Press.
Cashman, R. (2006). The bitter-sweet awakening: The legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Pan Macmillan.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project management journal, 45(2), 6-19.
Girginov, V. (2015). Sustainable legacy: Securing the Olympics’ environmental, social, and cultural benefits. Routledge.
Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2011). Olympic cities: City agendas, planning, and the world’s games, 1896–2016. Routledge.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge university press.
International Olympic Committee [IOC]. (2013). London 2012 sustainability report.
Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. (1965). Post-Olympic infrastructure development report. Government of Japan.
Monclús, F. J. (1998). Barcelona’s urban transformation: The Olympic Village as a catalyst. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 45–60.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public affairs.
Preuss, H. (2002). The economic impact of Olympic Games. Olympic Review, 44, 9–14.
Preuss, H. (2004). The economics of staging the Olympics: a comparison of the Games, 1972-2008. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Riordan, J. (1991). Sport, politics, and communism. Manchester University Press.
Roche, M. (2002). Megaevents and modernity: Olympics and expos in the growth of global culture. Routledge.
Roche, M. (2017). Mega-events, social movements and cultural politics. Routledge.
Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2013). Heritage, communities and archaeology. A&C Black.
Tzanelli, R. (2021). Digital and cultural heritage in Olympic contexts: Tokyo 2020 and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tzanelli, R. (2022). The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics: Digital heritage and data sovereignty. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(5), 621–638.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage.
UNESCO. (2021). Ethics of artificial intelligence.
Xu, G. (2008). Olympic dreams: China and sports, 1895-2008. Harvard University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsdp.v5i1.82310
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats