Emerging Technologies in Pre-Service Teacher Education: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Research Trends (2015–2024)

Ardiansah Ardiansah, Gema Rullyana

Abstract


The integration of emerging technologies into pre-service teacher education has become an increasingly prominent focus in educational research. To capture the state of the art in this field, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 1,477 Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2015 and 2025. Statistical and visual analyses of the retrieved literature indicate a steady growth in publications, with notable peaks coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated digital adoption in teacher training. The findings reveal that the most influential authors and frameworks, particularly TPACK, continue to shape scholarly discourse, while cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, gamification, and learning analytics represent emerging themes. Co-occurrence and clustering analyses identified seven major thematic groups, spanning from advanced digital tools and instructional applications to teacher preparation, digital competence, and blended learning contexts. These clusters highlight the multidimensional nature of technology integration, linking innovative digital practices with pedagogical and institutional concerns. Moreover, the collaboration network analysis shows strong international partnerships, with the United States, Australia, China, and several European and Asian countries acting as central hubs. This study contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive mapping of global research trends, intellectual structures, and future directions in pre-service teacher education and emerging technologies. The results offer valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to design adaptive and evidence-based teacher preparation programs that align with the demands of 21st-century education.


Keywords


Emerging technologies; pre-service teacher education; bibliometrics; Research Trends

References


Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6

Aleksieva, L. (2025). Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for the Digital Transformation of Education: Exploring University Teacher Educators’ Views and Practical Strategies. Education Sciences, 15(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040404

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Børte, K., & Lillejord, S. (2024). Learning to teach: Aligning pedagogy and technology in a learning design tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104693

Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184

Chen, G., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006

Daltoè, T., Ruth-Herbein, E., Brucker, B., Jaekel, A. K., Trautwein, U., Fauth, B., Gerjets, P., & Göllner, R. (2024). Immersive insights: Unveiling the impact of 360-degree videos on preservice teachers’ classroom observation experiences and teaching-quality ratings. Computers and Education, 213, 104976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104976

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers and Education, 130, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010

Fegely, A., Hagan, H., Warriner, G., & McKenzie, M. (2024). The Teaching Methods Classroom Meets Virtual Reality: Insights for Pre-Service Teaching Methods Instructors. TechTrends, 68(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00936-3

Fernández-Cruz, F. J., & Fernández-Díaz, M. J. (2016). Generation z’s teachers and their digital skills. Comunicar, 24(46), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-10

Fernández-Otoya, F., Cabero-Almenara, J., Pérez-Postigo, G., Bravo, J., Alcázar-Holguin, M. A., & Vilca-Rodríguez, M. (2024). Digital and Information Literacy in Basic-Education Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020127

Freeman, I. M., & Lee, H. K. (2024). Pre-Service Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions of Classroom-Based Mixed-Reality Simulations. Education Sciences, 14(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040347

Gandolfi, E., Ferdig, R. E., & Kosko, K. W. (2024). Evaluating how extended reality delivery device and preservice teacher major impact presence in immersive learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 2296–2314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13446

Gu, X., & Blackmore, K. L. (2016). Recent trends in academic journal growth. Scientometrics, 108(2), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1985-3

Guan, L., Zhang, Y., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Pre-service teachers preparedness for AI-integrated education: An investigation from perceptions, capabilities, and teachers’ identity changes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(August 2024), 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085

Guerrero Puerta, L. (2024). Exploring if Gamification Experiences Make an Impact on Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Future Gamification Use: A Case Report. Societies, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14010011

Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772

Hong, S., Moon, J., Eom, T., Awoyemi, I. D., & Hwang, J. (2025). Generative AI-Enhanced Virtual Reality Simulation for Pre-Service Teacher Education: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Usability and Instructional Utility for Course Integration. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080997

Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016

Kali, Y., Sagy, O., Benichou, M., Atias, O., & Levin-Peled, R. (2019). Teaching expertise reconsidered: The Technology, Pedagogy, Content and Space (TPeCS) knowledge framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12847

Kaur, R., Saini, S. K., Saini, R., Aggarwal, V., P, S. V., & K, K. (2025). Harnessing Disruptive Technologies in Education: The Role of AI, VR/AR, Blockchain, IoT, and Adaptive Learning Platforms. 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering (AIDE), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIDE64228.2025.10986860

Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005

Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

Marks, A., AL-Ali, M., Atassi, R., Elkishk, A. A., & Rezgui, Y. (2021). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Maturity and Challenges Post COVID-19. 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68285-9_6

Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611

Moravec, J. W., & Martínez-Bravo, M. C. (2023). Global trends in disruptive technological change: social and policy implications for education. On the Horizon, 31(34), 147–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2023-0007

Nel, C. (2024). Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Teach Reading Strategies within a Mixed Reality Simulation Environment. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 41, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.41.03

Nurhas, I., Aditya, B. R., Jacob, D. W., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2022). Understanding the challenges of rapid digital transformation: the case of COVID-19 pandemic in higher education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(13), 2924–2940. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1962977

Okumuş, A., & Savaş, P. (2024). Investigating EFL teacher candidates’ acceptance and self-perceived self-efficacy of augmented reality. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16571–16596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12517-1

Pathiranage, A., & Karunaratne, T. (2023). Teachers’ Agency in Technology for Education in Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Periods: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090917

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of science (Wos) and scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(12), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778

Redecker, C. (2017). JRC Publications Repository - European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/178382

Saboowala, R., & Manghirmalani Mishra, P. (2021). Readiness of In-service Teachers Toward a Blended Learning Approach as a Learning Pedagogy in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211015232

Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569

Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers and Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers and Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

Ürek, H. (2024). The Impact of a Mobile Phone and Mobile Application-Supported Science Laboratory on the Digital Literacy of Preservice Teachers and Their Disposition Toward Using Technology in Class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(6), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10138-4

Vasconcelos, L., Gleasman, C., Umutlu, D., & Kim, C. M. (2024). Epistemic Agency in Preservice Teachers’ Science Lessons with Robots. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(3), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10092-1

Wang, M., Chen, Z., Xu, Y., Maheshi, B., & Gašević, D. (2025). Intelligent teaching analytics for collaborative reflection: investigating pre-service teachers’ perceptions, experiences and shared regulation processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00538-w

Weisberg, L., & Dawson, K. (2023). The Intersection of Equity Pedagogy and Technology Integration in Preservice Teacher Education: A Scoping Review. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231182129

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bai, J. Y. H., Lee, K., Slagter van Tryon, P. J., & Prinsloo, P. (2024). New advances in artificial intelligence applications in higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(32), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00464-3

Zhang, H., & Tian, M. (2025). Unpacking the multi-dimensional nature of teacher competencies: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 1004–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2369867

Zhang, M., Surienty, L., & Hu, D. (2024). Bibliometric visualization analysis of teachers’ work stress. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 2024(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.10257

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v25i2.104234

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 EDUTECH

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Copyright © 2018 Edutech