A New Hybrid Fuzzy Decision Model for Barrier Identification and Strategy Prioritization in Circular Rice Supply Chains: A Case Study in Indonesia

Dana Marsetiya Utama, Ikhlasul Amallynda, Rahmad Wisnu Wardana, Tyas Yuli Rosiani, Rista Anggriani, Danang Setiya Wijaya

Abstract


This study aims to identify barriers to implementing a circular rice supply chain in Indonesia and to prioritize strategies for overcoming them. Data were collected from seven experts representing academia, industry, farmer cooperatives, and government agencies. A hybrid fuzzy framework was applied, combining the Fuzzy Delphi method to validate barriers, the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method to assign weights, and the Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment to rank solutions. Results reveal that the most critical barriers lie in the Economy and Investment dimension, particularly high financial costs and risks, lack of incentives, short-term economic orientation, capital-intensive spending, and low raw material prices. Priority strategies include cross-sector partnerships and fiscal incentives, supported by logistics hubs and circular literacy training. The study concludes that successful adoption requires not only technology but also enabling regulations, economic incentives, and managerial change. These findings provide actionable guidance for policymakers and supply chain managers to build sustainable, resilient food systems.

Keywords


Circular supply chain; fuzzy best worst method; Fuzzy complex proportional assessment; Fuzzy Delphi; Rice supply chain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sukmawati, D., and Maryanti, R. (2022). Development of education and economic circulation in supporting local potential as community empowerment efforts amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(2), 235-250.

Aithal, S., and Aithal, P. S. (2023). Importance of circular economy for resource optimization in various industry sectors–A review-based opportunity analysis. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 7(2), 191-215.

Jauhari, W. A., Kenlaksita, D. N., Kurdhi, N. A., and Utama, D. M. (2025). An optimization framework for sustainable closed-loop supply chains with green investment and recovery policy. Supply Chain Analytics, 2025, 100146.

Mansur, A., Handayani, D. I., Wangsa, I. D., Utama, D. M., and Jauhari, W. A. (2023). A mixed-integer linear programming model for sustainable blood supply chain problems with shelf-life time and multiple blood types. Decision Analytics Journal, 8, 100279.

Swastika, D. K. S., Priyanti, A., Hasibuan, A. M., Sahara, D., Arya, N. N., Malik, A., Ilham, N., Sayekti, A. L., Triastono, J., and Asnawi, R. (2024). Pursuing circular economics through the integrated crop-livestock systems: An integrative review on practices, strategies and challenges post green revolution in Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2024, 101269.

Islam, M. Z., and Zheng, L. (2025). Why is it necessary to integrate circular economy practices for agri‐food sustainability from a global perspective? Sustainable Development, 33(1), 600-620.

Stegmann, P., Londo, M., and Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X, 6, 100029.

Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Mendoza, J. M. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., and Gallego-Schmid, A. (2021). Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: Definition, strategies and indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105618.

Putri, N. S. (2024). Circular economy on agricultural product: assessing food security resilience and sustainable growth. SUKUK: International Journal of Banking, Finance, Management and Business, 3(I), 16-28.

Delouyi, F. L., Ranjbari, M., and Esfandabadi, Z. S. (2023). A hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis to explore barriers to the circular economy implementation in the food supply chain. Sustainability, 15(12), 9506.

Roy, T., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, A., and Agrawal, R. (2022). Redesigning traditional linear supply chains into circular supply chains–A study into its challenges. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 113-126.

Luthra, S., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Joshi, S., Collins, E., and Mangla, S. (2022). Overcoming barriers to cross-sector collaboration in circular supply chain management: a multi-method approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102582.

Bai, C., Joseph, S., Fengfu, Y., and and Dou, Y. (2020). Sustainable supply chain flexibility and its relationship to circular economy-target performance. International Journal of Production Research, 58(19), 5893-5910.

Debnath, B., Bari, A. B. M. M., Pacheco, D. A. d. J., and Karmaker, C. L. (2023). An integrated Best–Worst Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling approach for assessing the barriers to circular economy implementation. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100250.

Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., and Kumar, P. (2024). Barriers for adoption of Industry 4.0 in sustainable food supply chain: a circular economy perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2), 385-411.

Govindan, K., Nasr, A. K., Karimi, F., and Mina, H. (2022). Circular economy adoption barriers: An extended fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL and Supermatrix structure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1566-1586.

Khandelwal, C., and Barua, M. K. (2024). Prioritizing circular supply chain management barriers using fuzzy AHP: case of the Indian plastic industry. Global Business Review, 25(1), 232-251.

Sharma, M., Jain, N. L., and Purohit, J. K. (2024). Analysis of circular economy barriers in manufacturing context for indian industries: A BWM ranking process. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 29349-29377.

Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., and Salimi-Zavieh, S. G. (2022). Evaluating barriers and challenges of circular supply chains using a decision-making model based on rough sets. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(8), 7275-7296.

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Keogh, J. G., and Zailani, S. (2022). Barriers to blockchain adoption in the circular economy: A fuzzy delphi and best-worst approach. Sustainability, 14(6), 3611.

Sharma, R., Yadav, V., and Gaur, T. S. (2025). Barriers to adopting circular economy practices in Indian textile industries. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 345.

Assemlali, S., and Sabar, M. (2024). Identification of the barriers to the adoption of Circular Supply Chains in Moroccan companies: A combined qualitative analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Model approach. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 401, 10001.

Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N. P., Dora, M., and Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context. Production Planning and Control, 29(6), 551-569.

Farooque, M., Zhang, A., and Liu, Y. (2019). Barriers to circular food supply chains in China. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 677-696.

Ozen, Y. D. O., Kazancoglu, Y., and Mangla, S. K. (2020). Synchronized barriers for circular supply chains in industry 3.5/industry 4.0 transition for sustainable resource management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104986.

Lahane, S., and Kant, R. (2021). Evaluating the circular supply chain implementation barriers using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-DEMATEL approach. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2, 100014.

Lewandowska, K. W., Dawson, P. G., and Mierzwiak, R. (2025). Enablers and barriers in building the circular supply chain through remanufacturing - Grey DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 284, 109617.

Shabanian, M., Jabbari, H., Sirani, M., Ghodrati, H., and Josheghani, M. E. (2025). Designing a model for the implementation of fourth-generation banking in iran using the fuzzy Delphi method and interpretive structural modeling. Business, Marketing, and Finance Open, 2(2), 12-23.

Chen, C.-W., Wang, J.-H., Wang, J. C., and Shen, Z.-H. (2018). Developing indicators for sustainable campuses in taiwan using fuzzy Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of cleaner production, 193, 661-671.

Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., and Khan, S. (2023). Evaluating sustainability initiatives in warehouse for measuring sustainability performance: An emerging economy perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 324(1), 461-500.

Tu, Y., Chen, K., Wang, H., and Li, Z. (2020). Regional water resources security evaluation based on a hybrid fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4987.

Roy, P. K., and Shaw, K. (2022). An integrated fuzzy model for evaluation and selection of mobile banking (m-banking) applications using new fuzzy-BWM and fuzzy-TOPSIS. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 8(3), 2017-2038.

Guo, S., and Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31.

Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.

Yilmaz, I. (2023). A hybrid DEA–fuzzy COPRAS approach to the evaluation of renewable energy: A case of wind farms in Turkey. Sustainability, 15(14), 11267.

Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J. S., and Goodarzi, G. H. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(5), 1115-1130.

Utama, D. M., and Abirfatin, M. (2023). Sustainable Lean Six-sigma: A new framework for improve sustainable manufacturing performance. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 17, 100700.

Masudin, I., Zuliana, P. E., Utama, D. M., and Restuputri, D. P. (2024). Assessment and risk mitigation on halal meat supply chain using fuzzy best-worst method (BWM) and risk mitigation number (RMN). Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(3), 842-865.

K, V. K. E., K, S., Kandasamy, J., Venkat, V., and Mani, R. S. (2023). Barriers to the adoption of digital technologies in a functional circular economy network. Operations Management Research, 16(3), 1541-1561.

Barford, A., and Ahmad, S. R. (2021). A call for a socially restorative circular economy: Waste pickers in the recycled plastics supply chain. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(2), 761-782.

Quayson, M., Bai, C., Sun, L., and Sarkis, J. (2023). Building blockchain‐driven dynamic capabilities for developing circular supply chain: Rethinking the role of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4821-4840.

Saarinen, A., and Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2023). Financing-related drivers and barriers for circular economy business: Developing a conceptual model from a field study. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(3), 1187-1211.

Muyiwa-Ajayi, T. P., Augoye, O., and Sobowale, A. (2024). Financial management strategies for a circular economy. International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research, 3(1), 186-195.

González-Sánchez, R., Settembre-Blundo, D., Ferrari, A. M., and García-Muiña, F. E. (2020). Main dimensions in the building of the circular supply chain: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(6), 2459.

Pohan, M.A.R., Utama, J., and Herdiana, B. (2024). Novel motion planning strategy with fuzzy logic for improving safety in autonomous vehicles in response to risky road user behaviors. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(3), 471-484.

Anis, S.K., and Masek, A. (2024). Fuzzy Delphi method application towards usability evaluation of problem solving framework: Application in education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 49-62.

Albar, C.N., Widiansyah, M.G., Mubarok, S., Aziz, M.A., and Maulana, H. (2021). Application of augmented reality technology with the fuzzy logic method as an online physical education lecture method in the new normal era. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(1), 35-40.

Wasis, W., Suparji, S., Kusnanik, N.W., and Kartini, U.T. (2023). Optimization with Fuzzy Multiple criteria decision making for integration, governance, and management study programs. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 3(2), 371-382.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v11i2.89788

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology is published by UPI.
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter
View My Stats