Artificial Intelligence Shortcuts and Infrastructure Deficits in Vocational Project-Based Learning
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in vocational education poses dual challenges: rigorous technical curriculum mandates clash with severely constrained physical workshop facilities. This structural imbalance drives students to adopt digital shortcuts, risking the efficacy of Project-Based Learning (PjBL). This descriptive qualitative case study explores this phenomenon among 23 visual communication design (VCD) students at a vocational high school. Through participant observation and artifact evaluation, project originality was measured using a four-level analytical rubric assessing AI detection indices, visual anatomy defects, source files, and ideation logs. The availability of only a single sublimation press unit created substantial physical production bottlenecks, inducing severe frustration. Consequently, most students responded to this operational pressure by exploiting automatic vector-tracing shortcuts. This behavior manifests as fake engagement, triggered by deficient technological literacy, and caused significant delays extending across eight classroom sessions. Rubric scores confirmed a dominance of low-originality levels resulting from instant software manipulation devoid of manual sketching. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), findings prove infrastructure deficits systematically hinder student learning autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Evaluating the facility-to-student ratio emerges as a critical imperative for institutional management. Furthermore, developing cross-teacher integrated instructional modules is vital to sustain pedagogical momentum, while policymakers must recalibrate AI utilization guidelines to prioritize reinforcing fundamental psychomotor skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., & Andoh, R. P. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8.
Chang, Y., Choi, J., & Şen-Akbulut, M. (2024). Undergraduate students’ engagement in project-based learning with an authentic context. Education Sciences, 14(2).
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
De Barros, V. A. M., Paiva, H. M., & Hayashi, V. T. (2023). Using PBL and agile to teach artificial intelligence to undergraduate computing students. IEEE Access, 11, 77737–77749.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544.
Huo, H., & Wang, F. (2022). A Study of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Poster Layout Design in Visual Communication. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 1191073.
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348.
Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100211.
Li, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationship between teacher support and student engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20051–20070.
Liu, H., Fan, J., & Xia, M. (2025). Exploring individual’s emotional and autonomous learning profiles in AI-enhanced data-driven language learning: An expanded sor perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 122.
Liu, X., & Yao, R. (2023). Design of visual communication teaching system based on artificial intelligence and CAD technology. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 20(S10), 90–101.
Matthews, B., Shannon, B., & Roxburgh, M. (2023). Destroy all humans: The Dematerialisation of the designer in an age of automation and its Impact on graphic design - a literature review. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 42(3), 367–383.
Ng, D. T. K., Xinyu, C., Leung, J. K. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Fostering students’ AI literacy development through educational games: AI knowledge, affective and cognitive engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2049–2064.
Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2025). Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(2), 315–336.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 66–78.
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3).
Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Impact of Need Satisfaction on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Mediated by Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2).
Wyatt, M., & Looper, S. (1999). Successful learning comes from doing. Jossey-Bass.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yu, G., Akhter, S., Kumar, T., Ortiz, G. G. R., & Saddhono, K. (2022). Innovative application of new media in visual communication design and resistance to innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v22i1.100196
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Risca Indra Prasetya, Tuti Suartini, Suciati Suciati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.


