Artificial Intelligence Shortcuts and Infrastructure Deficits in Vocational Project-Based Learning

Risca Indra Prasetya, Tuti Suartini, Suciati Suciati

Abstract


The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in vocational education poses dual challenges: rigorous technical curriculum mandates clash with severely constrained physical workshop facilities. This structural imbalance drives students to adopt digital shortcuts, risking the efficacy of Project-Based Learning (PjBL). This descriptive qualitative case study explores this phenomenon among 23 visual communication design (VCD) students at a vocational high school. Through participant observation and artifact evaluation, project originality was measured using a four-level analytical rubric assessing AI detection indices, visual anatomy defects, source files, and ideation logs. The availability of only a single sublimation press unit created substantial physical production bottlenecks, inducing severe frustration. Consequently, most students responded to this operational pressure by exploiting automatic vector-tracing shortcuts. This behavior manifests as fake engagement, triggered by deficient technological literacy, and caused significant delays extending across eight classroom sessions. Rubric scores confirmed a dominance of low-originality levels resulting from instant software manipulation devoid of manual sketching. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), findings prove infrastructure deficits systematically hinder student learning autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Evaluating the facility-to-student ratio emerges as a critical imperative for institutional management. Furthermore, developing cross-teacher integrated instructional modules is vital to sustain pedagogical momentum, while policymakers must recalibrate AI utilization guidelines to prioritize reinforcing fundamental psychomotor skills.


Keywords


Artificial Intelligence; Project-based Learning; Vocational Infrastructure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., & Andoh, R. P. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8.

Chang, Y., Choi, J., & Şen-Akbulut, M. (2024). Undergraduate students’ engagement in project-based learning with an authentic context. Education Sciences, 14(2).

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

De Barros, V. A. M., Paiva, H. M., & Hayashi, V. T. (2023). Using PBL and agile to teach artificial intelligence to undergraduate computing students. IEEE Access, 11, 77737–77749.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544.

Huo, H., & Wang, F. (2022). A Study of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Poster Layout Design in Visual Communication. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 1191073.

Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348.

Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100211.

Li, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationship between teacher support and student engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20051–20070.

Liu, H., Fan, J., & Xia, M. (2025). Exploring individual’s emotional and autonomous learning profiles in AI-enhanced data-driven language learning: An expanded sor perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 122.

Liu, X., & Yao, R. (2023). Design of visual communication teaching system based on artificial intelligence and CAD technology. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 20(S10), 90–101.

Matthews, B., Shannon, B., & Roxburgh, M. (2023). Destroy all humans: The Dematerialisation of the designer in an age of automation and its Impact on graphic design - a literature review. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 42(3), 367–383.

Ng, D. T. K., Xinyu, C., Leung, J. K. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Fostering students’ AI literacy development through educational games: AI knowledge, affective and cognitive engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2049–2064.

Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2025). Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(2), 315–336.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 66–78.

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3).

Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Impact of Need Satisfaction on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Mediated by Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2).

Wyatt, M., & Looper, S. (1999). Successful learning comes from doing. Jossey-Bass.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yu, G., Akhter, S., Kumar, T., Ortiz, G. G. R., & Saddhono, K. (2022). Innovative application of new media in visual communication design and resistance to innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v22i1.100196

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Risca Indra Prasetya, Tuti Suartini, Suciati Suciati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

Bandar Slot

SLOT4D

SLOT88

Demo Slot

TOTOSLOT

SUNDA787

Slot Pulsa

Garansi Kekalahan

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SLOT THAILAND

Toto Togel

SLOT BONUS 100

Bandar Slot

Slot88

Sbobet

Slot Demo

SLOT BONUS 25

SITUS TOTO

BANDAR SLOT

Toto Slot4D

Slot Maxwin

Slot88

Slot Qris