Artificial Intelligence Shortcuts and Infrastructure Deficits in Vocational Project-Based Learning
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies poses a dual challenge within the vocational education ecosystem. While the curriculum mandates rigorous technical competency standards, the availability of physical facilities within school workshops remains severely constrained. This structural infrastructure imbalance drives students to adopt digital shortcuts that risk undermining the efficacy of Project-Based Learning (PjBL). This descriptive qualitative case study explores this phenomenon among 23 visual communication design (VCD) students at a vocational high school (SMK). Data collection relied on participant observation and design artifact evaluation. Project originality was systematically measured using a four-level analytical rubric, with evaluation indicators spanning AI detection indices, visual anatomy defect analysis, source file track records, and ideation log histories. The limited availability of a single sublimation press unit created substantial bottlenecks during the physical production phase, inducing severe frustration among students. Consequently, the majority of the research subjects responded to this operational pressure by exploiting automatic vector-tracing shortcuts. This shortcut behavior manifests as a form of fake engagement triggered by deficient technological literacy. The completion cycle of a single project element suffered significant delays, extending across eight classroom sessions. The rubric scores confirmed a dominance of low-originality levels resulting from instant software manipulation devoid of manual sketching workflows. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), infrastructure deficits were proven to systematically hinder the cultivation of student learning autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Evaluating the ratio of manufacturing facilities to classroom capacity emerges as a critical imperative for institutional education management. Furthermore, the development of cross-teacher integrated instructional modules is vital to sustain project pedagogical momentum. Policymakers must recalibrate AI utilization guidelines to prioritize the reinforcement of fundamental psychomotor skills.
Keywords
References
Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., & Andoh, R. P. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346
Chang, Y., Choi, J., & Şen-Akbulut, M. (2024). Undergraduate students’ engagement in project-based learning with an authentic context. Education Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020168
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
De Barros, V. A. M., Paiva, H. M., & Hayashi, V. T. (2023). Using PBL and agile to teach artificial intelligence to undergraduate computing students. IEEE Access, 11, 77737–77749. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3298294
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886
Huo, H., & Wang, F. (2022). A study of artificial intelligence-based poster layout design in visual communication. Scientific Programming, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1191073
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211
Li, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationship between teacher support and student engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20051–20070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13574-w
Liu, H., Fan, J., & Xia, M. (2025). Exploring individual’s emotional and autonomous learning profiles in AI-enhanced data-driven language learning: An expanded sor perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102753
Liu, X., & Yao, R. (2023). Design of visual communication teaching system based on artificial intelligence and CAD technology. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 20(S10), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2023.S10.90-101
Matthews, B., Shannon, B., & Roxburgh, M. (2023). Destroy all humans: The Dematerialisation of the designer in an age of automation and its Impact on graphic design - a literature review. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 42(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12460
Ng, D. T. K., Xinyu, C., Leung, J. K. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Fostering students’ AI literacy development through educational games: AI knowledge, affective and cognitive engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2049–2064. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13009
Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2025). Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2317364
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Impact of Need Satisfaction on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Mediated by Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020165
Wyatt, M., & Looper, S. (1999). Successful learning comes from doing. Jossey-Bass.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yu, G., Akhter, S., Kumar, T., Ortiz, G. G. R., & Saddhono, K. (2022). Innovative application of new media in visual communication design and resistance to innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940899
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v22i1.100196
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Risca Indra Prasetya, Tuti Suartini, Suciati Suciati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.


