Doping Knowledge Among Indonesian Athletes: Sociodemographic Correlates and Educational Implications

Euis Heryati, Imas Damayanti, Abdi Wadud Syafi'i, Tian Kurniawan, Arvel Hafiza Aliyyurahman Yusuf Yusuf, Muhammad Iqbal Nurwahid

Abstract


A vital defense against rule infractions that could endanger athletes' careers and the integrity of sport is doping knowledge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Indonesian athletes' knowledge of doping and investigate how it relates to sociodemographic traits. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was completed by 436 athletes from different sports disciplines. Four knowledge domains were covered by the instrument: national anti-doping organizations, legal regulations, prohibited substances, and the definition of doping. The findings showed that athletes were generally aware of the existence of anti-doping organizations and the idea of doping. Nonetheless, there were still a lot of common misconceptions about prohibited substances. Many respondents believed that therapeutic-use drugs such as insulin and erythropoietin (EPO) were unrestricted, or they confused legal supplements with doping. While no significant differences were observed by gender, sport type, competition level, or medal achievement, knowledge varied significantly by age (p = 0.001), student status (p = 0.001), and athletic experience (p = 0.011). These findings highlight the need for more contextualized, practice-oriented anti-doping education tailored to athletes’ backgrounds. Strengthening evidence-based education may foster a cleaner and more ethical sporting environment in Indonesia.


Keywords


athletes, doping, education, knowledge, sociodemographics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Birzniece, V. (2015). Doping in sport: Effects, harm and misconceptions. Internal Medicine Journal, 45(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12629

Blank, C., Leichtfried, V., Schaiter, R., Fürhapter, C., Müller, D., & Schobersberger, W. (2015). Doping in sports: Knowledge and attitudes among parents of Austrian junior athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12172

Chiang, L. M., Shamsuddin, A. F., & Mahmood, T. M. T. (2018). Knowledge, attitude, and practice on doping among Malaysian student athletes. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 11(5), 72–76.

Dıncer, N., & Demır, H. (2013). The determination of knowledge levels related to doping in elite athletes. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 15(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.15314/tjse.23606

Estes, N. A. M., Kovacs, R. J., Baggish, A. L., & Myerburg, R. J. (2015). Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 11—Drugs and performance-enhancing substances. Circulation, 132(22), e330–e333. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000242

Hayati, N., & Haikal, M. R. (2024). The relationship between body image and steroid use in bodybuilding athletes. Science Midwifery, 12(2), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.35335/midwifery.v12i2.1518

Inoue, Y., Tanaka, M., Ezure, H., Ito, J., Sasaki, A., Takaki, T., Hata, H., Takayanagi, M., & Otsuka, N. (2025). Age-related differences in information gathering among nursing students: Implications for nursing education. Open Journal of Nursing, 15, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2025.151007

Istiqomah, E. R. (2022). Upaya Indonesia dalam menyelesaikan sanksi World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). eJournal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 10

Kim, T., & Kim, Y. H. (2017). Korean national athletes’ knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: A cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0093-2

Savulescu, J., Foddy, B., & Clayton, M. (2004). Performance enhancing drugs: Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport—The legalisation of drugs in sport may be fairer and safer. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Retrieved from http://bjsm.bmj.com/

Surya Gemilang, P., & Astuti, P. (2023). Upaya pencegahan penggunaan doping dalam PORPROV Jatim 2023. NOVUM: Jurnal Hukum, 272-283.

Traugott, E. C. (2006). Semantic change: Bleaching, strengthening, narrowing, extension. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 124–131). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01105-6

Trinh, K. V., Diep, D., Chen, K. J. Q., Huang, L., Gulenko, O. (2020). Effect of erythropoietin on athletic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 6(1), e000716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000716

Vernec, A., Healy, D., Banon, T., et al. (2024). Prevalence of therapeutic use exemptions at the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: An analysis of data from 2016 to 2022. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 58, 966–972.

World Anti-Doping Agency. (2024). The 2025 prohibited list. Retrieved July 11, 2025, from https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/2025list_en_final_clean_12_september_2024.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v11i1.91226

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Euis Heryati, Imas Damayanti, Abdi Wadud Syafi'i, Tian Kurniawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
statistics

View My Stats