MUTU LAYANAN AKADEMIK

Khairul Azan, Danny Meirawan, Cicih Sutarsih

Abstract


Abstrak

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisa pengaruh pemanfaatan fasilitas belajar dan kinerja staf Program Studi terhadap mutu layanan akademik Program Studi di Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah angket. Adapun subjek yang dijadikan sampel adalah mahasiswa dari 36 Program Studi yang ada di Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia yang berjumlah 352 mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gambaran umum mutu layanan akademik Program Studi di Sekolah Pascasarjana  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia berada pada kategori tinggi. Sedangkan untuk pemanfaatan fasilitas belajar berada pada kategori cukup, dan kinerja staf Program Studi berada pada kategori baik. Secara parsial pemanfaatan fasilitas dan kinerja staf Program Studi memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap mutu layanan akademik Program Studi. Begitu juga sama halnya jika dilihat secara simultan bahwa pemanfaatan fasilitas belajar dan kinerja staf Program Studi sama memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap mutu layanan akademik Program Studi.

Abstract 

This study aims to describe and analyze the effect of learning facilities utilization and study program staff performance towards quality of academic services for study program at the School of Postgraduate Studies Indonesia University of Education. The methode used in this study is a survey methode with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique used is a questionnaire. The sampled-subject are students from 36 existing courses at the School of Postgraduate Studies Indonesia University of Education amounting to 352 student. The result show that the general picture of the quality of academic services for study program at School of Postgraduate Studies Indonesia University of Education are in the category. As for the use of learning facilities in the fairly well category, and study program staff performance is in the good category. In partial, utilization of the facilities and study program staff performance have a significant influence on the quality of academic services for study program. So is the same as if seen that the simultaneous learning facilities utilization and study program staff performance a significant influence on the quality of academic services for study program.


Keywords


Kata kunci: Fasilitas Belajar, Kinerja Staf, Mutu Layanan Akademik Keyword: Learning Facilities, Staff Performance, Quality of Academic Service.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, R, & Ali, I. S. (2012). “Implementing TQM Practices in Pakistan Higher Education Institutions”. Pak. j. eng. technol. sci. Vol. 2. (1), 1-26.

Arum, A. S.W. (2007). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan. Jakarta: MKM.

Balakrishnan, S. M. W. S. (2013). Assessing Student Satisfaction in Transnational Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 27. (2), 143-156.

Bangun, Wilson. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Barnawi & Arifin, M. (2012). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Blandford, Sonia. (2000). Managing

Chong, S.Y & Ahmed, P. (2014). A Phenomenology of University Sercive Quality Experience. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 28. (1), 36-52.

Daryanto & Farid, M. (2013). Konsep Dasar Manajemen Pendidikan di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Fernandes, C., et al. (2013). “Understanding Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in the UAE HE Sector”. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 27. (6), 613-630.

Furqon. (2011). Statistik Terapan untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hartono. (2008). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Hoy, Charles., et al. (2000). Improving Quality in Education. London: Falmer Press.

Karwati, E & Priansa, J. D. (2013). Kinerja dan Profesionalisasi Kepala Sekolah. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kotler, P. (2008). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Lawanson, et al. (2011). “Provision and Management of School Facilities for the Implementation of UBE Programme”. Journal of Educational and Social Research. Vol. 1. (4), 47-55.

Lovelock, C & Wright, L. (2002). Principle of service marketing and management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Mahajan, R., et al. (2014). “Factors Affecting Quality of Management Education in India”. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 28. (4), 379-399

Min, Sein & Khoon, C.C. (2013). “Demographic Factors in the Evaluation of Service Quality in Higher Education: International Students’ Perspective”. international Review of Management and Business Research. Vol. 2. (4), 994-1010.

Minarti, Sri. (2011). Manajemen Sekolah (Mengelola Lembaga Pendidikan Secara Mandiri). Jogjakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.

Mosahab, R., et al. (2010). “Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: A Test of Mediation”. International Business Research. Vol. 3. (4), 72-80.

Naik, K. N. C., et al. (2010) “Service Quality (Servqual) and its Effect on Customer Satisfaction in Retailing”. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 16. (2), 231-243.

Rasli, et al. (2012). “Perception of Service Quality in Higher Education: Perspective of Iranian Students in Malaysian Universities “. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM). Vol. 1. (1), 10-25.

Rivai, V. dkk. (2005). Performance Apraisal. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Roberts, W.L. (2009). “Measuring School Facility Conditions: an illustration of the Importance of Purpose”. Jurnal Educational Administration. Vol. 47. (3), 368-380.

Rohiat. (2010). Manajemen Sekolah. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Sadarmayanti. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Saginova, O & Belyansky, V. (2008). “Facilitating Innovations in Higher education In Transition Economies”. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 22. (4), 341-351.

Sallis, Edward. (2006). Total Quality Management in Education (Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan). Jogjakarta: IRCiSoD.

Shah, T. F. (2013). “Service Qualtiy and Customer Satisfaction in Higher Education in Pakistan”. Journal of Qulity and Technology Management. Vol. IX. (IX), 73-89.

Suharsaputra, U. (2010). Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Supardi. (2014). Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Tjiptono, F. (2004). Manajemen Jasa. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Undang-Undang Pendidikan Tinggi No. 12 tahun 2012.

Uline, C & Moran, T.M. (2008). “The Walls Speak: the Interplay of Quality Facilities, School Climate, and Student Achievement”. Jurnal of Educational Administration. Vol. 46. (1), 55-73.

Wang, M. I & Shieh, J. C. (2006). “The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction : The Example of CJCU Library”. Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences. Vol. 27. (1), 193-203.

Wibowo. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wilkins, S dan Balakrishnan, S.M. (2013). “Assessing Student Satisfaction in Transnational Higher Education”. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 27. (2), 143-156.

Yeo, R. K. (2008). “Servicing Service Quality in Higher Education: Quest for Excellence”. On the Horizon. Vol. 16. (3), 152 – 161




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v22i1.5931

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free
hit counter
View My Stats