Examining Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding Based on Their Teaching Experiences in Simple Chemistry Demonstrations Activities Assisted by Exploratory Worksheets [Telaah Pemahaman Konseptual Guru Kimia Berdasarkan Pengalaman Mengajarnya pada Kegiatan Demonstrasi Materi Kimia Sederhana Berbantuan Lembar Kerja Eksploratif]
Abstract
Penguatan pemahaman konseptual guru kimia menjadi tantangan penting dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran sains yang kontekstual dan bermakna. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk menguatkan pemahaman konseptual guru terhadap fenomena dasar kimia berdasarkan evaluasi terhadap hasil respon pada lembar kerja demonstrasi. Sebanyak 30 guru kimia anggota MGMP di Provinsi Banten mengikuti pelatihan yang mencakup demonstrasi sembilan eksperimen sederhana dan pengisian lembar kerja eksploratif. Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif-naratif dengan mempertimbangkan indikator akurasi ilmiah dan kedalaman penjelasan, serta dikaitkan dengan pengalaman mengajar. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa guru senior (>20 tahun) cenderung memberikan penjelasan yang lebih logis dan ilmiah serta memiliki kemampuan metakognitif yang lebih tinggi. Guru pemula memiliki kemampuan komunikasi yang baik, namun kurang mampu menjelaskan secara ilmiah yang mendalam, sementara guru menengah menunjukkan gejala stagnasi konseptual. Beberapa demonstrasi juga memunculkan miskonsepsi sistemik, terutama pada fenomena yang tidak kasatmata. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pendekatan berbasis demonstrasi dan lembar kerja eksploratif tidak hanya efektif untuk mengembangkan pemahaman konseptual, tetapi juga berfungsi sebagai alat refleksi pedagogis. Implikasi praktisnya meliputi potensi replikasi dalam program pelatihan guru seperti PPG, IHT MGMP, dan supervisi berbasis coaching. Kegiatan ini merekomendasikan pelibatan guru senior sebagai fasilitator dalam skema pengembangan komunitas belajar profesional, sejalan dengan arah kebijakan Merdeka Belajar.
Strengthening chemistry teachers’ conceptual understanding remains a critical challenge in enhancing the quality of contextual and meaningful science learning. This community service initiative aims to reinforce teachers’ conceptual grasp of fundamental chemical phenomena by analyzing their responses to exploratory worksheet tasks during demonstration-based activities. A total of 30 chemistry teachers, all members of MGMP in Banten Province, participated in a training program that involved nine simple chemical demonstrations accompanied by structured worksheet-based exploration. A descriptive-narrative analysis was conducted, focusing on indicators of scientific accuracy and explanatory depth, and interpreted in relation to participants' teaching experience. The findings reveal that senior teachers (with more than 20 years of experience) tend to provide more logical and scientifically accurate explanations, alongside demonstrating higher metacognitive awareness. In contrast, novice teachers exhibited strong communication skills but lacked depth in scientific reasoning, while mid-career teachers showed signs of conceptual stagnation. Several demonstrations also revealed systemic misconceptions, particularly in relation to invisible or abstract phenomena. These results underscore the effectiveness of demonstration-based learning integrated with exploratory worksheets not only in fostering deeper conceptual understanding but also as tools for pedagogical reflection. The practical implications suggest that this model is replicable in teacher training programs such as PPG, MGMP-IHT, and coaching-based supervision initiatives. Furthermore, the study recommends the active involvement of senior teachers as facilitators in professional learning communities, aligning with the broader goals of Indonesia’s Merdeka Belajar education reform policy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abouelenein, Y., Selim, S., & Elmaadaway, M. (2023). Impact of a virtual chemistry lab in chemistry teaching on scientific practices and digital competence for pre-service science teachers. Educ. Inf. Technol., 29(3), 2805-2840.
Berbegal‐Mirabent, J., Mas-Machuca, M., & Marimon, F. (2018). Is research mediating the relationship between teaching experience and student satisfaction?. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 973 - 988.
Chen, B., & Chen, L. (2021). Examining the sources of high school chemistry teachers’ practical knowledge of teaching with practical work: from the teachers’ perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 476-485.
Clermont, C., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. (1994). Comparative Study of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Experienced and Novice Chemical Demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 419-441.
Clermont, C., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21-43.
Da Silva Freire, M., Talanquer, V., & Amaral, E. (2019). Conceptual profile of chemistry: a framework for enriching thinking and action in chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 674 - 692.
Dayal, P., & Ali-Chand, Z. (2022). Effective teaching and learning strategies in a chemistry classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 57(2), 425 - 443.
Driel, J., Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(2), 572-590.
Fatimah, S. S., Nuraini, V. A., Gumilar, G. G., Khoerunnisa, F., Suhanda, H., Kusrijadi, A., & Hana, M. N. (2022). Analisis minat dan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap pelajaran kimia melalui demonstrasi kimia berbasis chemistry for fun di SMAN 1 Pangandaran. Jurnal Pengabdian Isola, 1(2), 47–52.
Hernani, H., et al. (2024). Design and implementation of contextual chemistry learning oriented towards science literacy to support the implementation of the merdeka curriculum. Jurnal Pengabdian Isola, 3(1), 179–185.
Khair, M., Azhar, M., & Ulianus, A. (2020). A competence of teacher in making e-LKPD using flip book maker with emphasis on macro, submicro, and simbolic level representation of chemistry. Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-7.
Lusiana, L., Enawaty, E., & Rasmawan, R. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi laju reaksi di SMA Indonesia Muda. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 5(1), 51-58.
Marzabal, A., Merino, C., Moreira, P., & Delgado, V. (2019). Assessing science teaching explanations in initial teacher education: how is this teaching practice transferred across different chemistry topics?. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1107–1123.
Mawarnis, E., Roza, L., Maiyena, S., & Rahman, M. (2023). Research-Based Teaching materials as innovation in chemistry learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 634-643.
Mönch, C., & Markic, S. (2023). Elements constituting and influencing in-service secondary chemistry teachers’ pedagogical scientific language knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(1), 25-41.
Nixon, R., Campbell, B., & Luft, J. (2016). Effects of subject-area degree and classroom experience on new chemistry teachers’ subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1636 - 1654.
Obispo, K., & Ligsanan, L. (2025). Development, validation and evaluation of home-based laboratory worksheets in general chemistry. Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research, 4(2), 201–220.
Pahriah, P., Adnyana, P., Ariawan, I., & Wesnawa, I. (2024). Effectiveness of the Constructivist Approach (Guided Inquiry) in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Review. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(5), 1152-1165.
Podolsky, A., Kini, T., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of US research. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 4(4), 286-308.
Sewry, J., Glover, S., Harrison, T., Shallcross, D., & Ngcoza, K. (2014). Offering Community Engagement Activities To Increase Chemistry Knowledge and Confidence for Teachers and Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1611-1617.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 14 - 4.
Taber, K., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners’ explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 329-353.
Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., Tuysuz, M., Sarici, E., Soysal, C., & Kilinc, S. (2021). The role of the argumentation-based laboratory on the development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ argumentation skills. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 30 - 55.
Veal, W. (2004). Beliefs and knowledge in chemistry teacher development. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 329 - 351.
Vinko, L., Delaney, S., & Devetak, I. (2020). Teachers’ opinions about the effect of chemistry demonstrations on students’ interest and chemistry knowledge. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(2), 9-25.
Ye, J., Zheng, Y., Zhan, M., Zhou, Y., Li, L., & Chen, D. (2024). Characteristics of pre-service chemistry teachers' mechanistic reasoning in organic chemistry tasks: An eye-tracking study. Research in Science Education, 55(1), 277–296.
Yesiloglu, S. (2019). Investigation of pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding of radioactive decay: a laboratory modelling activity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 862-872.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpi.v4i1.85668
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.