Development of cognitive and psychomotor evaluation instruments for transaxle, motor, and generator replacement
Abstract
As technology advances, competencies must also keep pace with these developments. The current trend in the automotive sector is the transition from electric vehicles to electric vehicles. In electric vehicle competencies, there is no evaluation instrument that can be used to measure electric vehicle maintenance competencies. The impact of this is a non-objective assessment. This study aims to create a valid and feasible cognitive and psychomotor evaluation instrument for replacing transaxles, motors, and generators. The research method used in creating this instrument is 4D (Define, Design, Development, Disseminate). The results of the study show that based on the content validity test on the cognitive evaluation instrument with the CVR and CVI techniques, out of 45 evaluation instrument items, 2 of them are invalid. Based on the construct validity test, the level of difficulty is obtained with a moderate and difficult level, the discrimination power of 27 questions is very good, 13 are quite good, 3 questions are set aside/revised, the distractor index is known in several question choices that need to be revised. Based on the reliability test, the results of the Spearman Brown correlation coefficient of 0.768 can be stated that the cognitive evaluation instrument is reliable. Based on the content validity test on the psychomotor evaluation instrument using the CVR and CVI techniques, it was found that all items were declared valid. The conclusion of this study is that the cognitive and psychomotor evaluation instrument for replacing transaxles, motors, and generators is valid and suitable for use.
Keywords : Cognitive; electric vehicle; evaluation instrument; Pshycomotor
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Walker, H. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.
Ehsani, M., Gao, Y., Gay, S. e, & Emadi, A. (2005). Modern Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Fuel Cells Vehicles. CRC Press.
Magdalena, I., Fauzi, H. N., & Putri, R. (2020). Pentingnya Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Dan Akibat Memanipulasinya. Bintang : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains, 2(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i1.722
Nengsih, N. R., Yusmaita, E., & Gazali, F. (2019). Evaluasi Validitas Konten dan Konstruk Bahan Ajar Asam Basa Berbasis REACT. EduKimia, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v1i1.104017
Pradnyaswari, N. M. A. D., & Dana, I. M. (2022). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Struktur Modal, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Leverage Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Otomotif. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 11(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2022.v11.i03.p05
Putra, S. R. (2013). Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. DIVA Press.
Rajagukguk, K. P., Lubis, R. R., Kirana, J., & Rahayu, N. S. (2021). Pelatihan Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Model 4D Pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 14–22. https://jurnal.stkipalmaksum.ac.id/index.php/jpkm/article/view/144
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (19 ed.). PT REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.
Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur Penyusunan dan Analisis Tes untuk Penilaian Hasil Belajar Bidang Kognitif. PT Refika Aditama.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teacher of Exceptional Childern : A Sourcebook. Leadership Training.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/atikanoto.v1i1.74759
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© 2024 ATIKANOTO: Journal of Automotive Engineering Education


