WHICH ONE IS BETTER BETWEEN PAPER-BASED OR COMPUTER-BASED TOEFL?: TEST TAKERS’ PERSPERCTIVES

Faridatul Istighfaroh, Ana Kumalasari, Danar Mustaqim Ludan, Vita Nugrah Septiana, Junaidi Mistar, Mutmainnah Mustofa, Sonny Elfiyanto

Abstract


Due to the lack of current study numbers discussing English proficiency tests such as TOEFL, this study aims to investigate the test takers’ point of view on the TOEFL ITP test, mainly paper based-test and computer-based TOEFL, the similar TOEFL ITP test but employing computer screen as media. The latest study about those two assessments is necessary since both kinds of TOEFL media are massively implemented, particularly backward and after the pandemic Covid19. A survey methodology is employed in this study by spreading questionnaires. The scores gained from those two disparate TOEFL tests are described statistically. The gathered data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and factor analysis to outline the perspectives of the test-takers on TOEFL PBT and CBT. Fifty-two participants from various education background levels, ages and genders partaking in this study. As a result, this study reveals that the implementing a computer screen for TOEFL obtained more positive percentages than paper-based TOEFL tests. Further discussion concerning prior study and implications are presented

Keywords


TOEFL ITP; Paper Based Test; Computer Based Test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulloh, A., Sarsono, S., & Basuki, S. (2021). Preparing PBT TOEFL prediction: An

experience of online teaching TOEFL preparation. Journal of English Language

and Literature (JELL), 6(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v6i1.116

Agusta, A. R. (2022). Development of learning outcomes assessment instruments using computer based test (CBT). Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3070

Al-Amri, S. (2007). Computer-based vs. paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode matter. Proceedings of the BAAL Conference 2007, 101–110.

Amelia, R., & Harmaini, F. (2020). Development of web-based TOEFL learning media (E-TOEFL) using moodle at Universitas Bung Hatta. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 990(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/990/1/012002

Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., Foo, S., & Esposito, G. (2022). A neurocognitive investigation of test methods and gender effects in listening assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744667

Barkaoui, K. (2017). Examining repeaters’ performance on second language proficiency tests: A review and a call for research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1347790

Bridgeman, B., Cho, Y., & DiPietro, S. (2016). Predicting grades from an English language assessment: The importance of peeling the onion. Language Testing, 33(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215583066

Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2014). Contextualizing performances: Comparing performances during TOEFL iBT TM and real-life academic speaking activities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.947532

Fleckenstein, J., Leucht, M., & Köller, O. (2018). Teachers’ judgement accuracy concerning CEFR levels of prospective university students. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1421956

Ginther, A. (2001). Effects of the presence and absence of visuals on performance on TOEFL ® CBT listening-comprehension stimulate. ETS Research Report Series, 2001(2), i–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2001.tb01858.x

Ihlenfeldt, S. D., & Rios, J. A. (2022). A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of English language proficiency assessments for college admissions. Language Testing, 026553222211123. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221112364

Isbell, D. R., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high-stakes decisions. Language Testing, 37(4), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220943483

Ivanova, R., & Ivanov, A. (2021). Online reading skills as an object of testing in international english exams (ielts, toefl, cae). International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 713–732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14441a

Jeong, H. (2014). A comparative study of scores on computer-based tests and paper-based tests. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.710647

Kristanti, F. (2019). Contemporary role of English in the academic world. English Language and Literature: Their Contemporary Roles, 7–13.

Lee, S., & Winke, P. (2018). Young learners’ response processes when taking computerized tasks for speaking assessment. Language Testing, 35(2), 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217704009

Monfils, L. F., & Manna, V. F. (2021). Time to achieving a designated criterion score level: A survival analysis study of test taker performance on the TOEFL iBT ® test. Language Testing, 38(1), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220940709

Netta, A., & Trisnawati, I. K. (2019). Acehnese undergraduate students’ strategies in preparing for TOEFL prediction: A preliminary study. Englisia Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v7i1.5779

Noubandegani, P. A. (2012). Students’ perceptions of computerized TOEFL test. Language Testing in Asia, 2(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-2-73

Papageorgiou, S., & Manna, V. F. (2021). Maintaining access to a large-scale test of academic language proficiency during the pandemic: The launch of TOEFL iBT Home Edition. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1864376

Pratiwi, D. I., Atmaja, D. S., & Prasetya, H. W. (2021). Multiple E-Learning technologies on practicing TOEFL structure and written expression. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1194

Putri, R. E., & Syarif, H. (2021). Students’ needs for TOEFL preparation course at university. Proceeding of International Conference on Language Pedagogy (ICOLP), 1(1), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.24036/icolp.v1i1.37

Rifiyani, A. J., Widowati, D. R., Ni’mah, D., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2022). To read on-screen or printed texts? A quantitative study into EFL students’ reading achievement. International Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 191–201.

Salma, N. F. (2018). Almost everything about TOEFL PBT.

Sawaki, Y., & Sinharay, S. (2018). Do the TOEFL iBT ® section scores provide value-added information to stakeholders? Language Testing, 35(4), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217716731

Sinclair, J., Larson, E. J., & Rajendram, S. (2019). “Be a machine”: International graduate students’ narratives around high-stakes English tests. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1628238

Suryani, N. Y. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual classroom in TOEFL preparation. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(2), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v3i2.2199

Syakur, A. (2019). Application of e-learning as a method in educational model to increase the TOEFL score in higher education. Journal of Development Research, 3(2), 111–116.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v22i2.56033

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v22i3.56033.g25858

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 EDUTECH

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Copyright © 2018 Edutech