TECHNOPARK-BASED LEARNING IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL RESEARCH TRENDS AND COMPETENCY FRAMEWORKS

Ricky Cahyasari Putra, Ade Dwi Putra Janata

Abstract


Technopark-based learning (TBL) has emerged as a strategic pedagogical model that embeds vocational students within the open innovation ecosystem of technology parks, engaging them in authentic research, development, and commercialization activities. Unlike prior bibliometric studies examining technoparks as infrastructure, this study is the first to specifically map TBL as a learning model within TVET, providing a competency cluster to curriculum framework directly applicable to program design. This study aimed to map the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and collaboration network of TBL research in vocational education (2015–2024), generating evidence-based insights for curriculum design, competency frameworks, and implementation policy. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on 287 documents retrieved from Scopus (2015–2024), applying co-word analysis, thematic mapping using the Cobo et al. framework, co-authorship network analysis, and citation burst detection; thematic categories are overlapping, so cluster counts exceed N = 287. Five competency clusters were identified: Digital Technology & Industry 4.0 (n = 94), Sustainability & Green Innovation (n = 76), Collaboration & Academic-Industry Networks (n = 104), Entrepreneurship & Startup Incubation (n = 86), and Adaptive & Lifelong Learning (n = 62). Publication volume grew from 8 documents in 2015 to 51 in 2023, representing a 538% increase, with Indonesia, China, Germany, the Netherlands, and Malaysia as the most productive contributors. Two actionable tools were produced: a TBL Logic Model and a Cluster, Competency, Activity, Assessment mapping table, equipping curriculum designers and policymakers with guidance for designing Technopark-integrated vocational programs aligned with global industry demands.


Keywords


Technopark; vocational education; innovation ecosystem; bibliometric analysis; Industry 4.0

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References


Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2023). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: a literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(4), 1489-1531.

Battistella, C., Ferraro, G., & Pessot, E. (2023). Technology transfer services impacts on open innovation capabilities of SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122875.

Cadorin, E., Klofsten, M., & Löfsten, H. (2021). Science parks, talent attraction and stakeholder involvement: An international study. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(1), 1–28.

Caloffi, A., Colovic, A., Rizzoli, V., & Rossi, F. (2023). Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122351.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

Fioravanti, V. L. S., Stocker, F., & Macau, F. (2023). Knowledge transfer in technological innovation clusters. Innovation and Management Review, 20(1), 43–59.

Guo, R., Ning, L., & Chen, K. (2022). How do human capital and R&D structure facilitate FDI knowledge spillovers to local firm innovation? Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1921–1947.

Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Rojas-Alvarado, R., & Monto-Mompo, S. (2021). Emerging regional innovation policies for industry 4.0: analyzing the digital innovation hub program in European regions. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(1), 106-129.

Jimenez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Unpacking the multiple spaces of innovation hubs. Information Society, 37(3), 163–176.

Jonek-Kowalska, I., & Wolniak, R. (2021). The influence of local economic conditions on start-ups and local open innovation systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 110.

Lepore, D., Testi, N., & Pásher, E. (2023). Building inclusive smart cities through innovation intermediaries. Sustainability, 15(5), 4024.

Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2021). Perceptual measures of science parks: Tenant firms’ associations between science park attributes and benefits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120408.

Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., Ahmadzadeh Kandi, N., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Hashemi, S. S. (2022). International entrepreneurial startups' location under uncertainty through a heterogeneous multi-layer decision-making approach: evidence and application of an emerging economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(3), 767-800.

Remneland-Wikhamn, B., & Styhre, A. (2023). Open innovation ecosystem organizing from a process view: A longitudinal study in the making of an innovation hub. R&D Management, 53(1), 24–42.

Rowe, A., Winchester-Seeto, T., & Mackaway, J. (2023). Mapping the landscape of work-integrated learning research: A bibliometric analysis. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 193–210.

Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2022). The D-BEST reference model: A flexible and sustainable support for the digital transformation of SMEs. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(3), 345–370.

Stojanova, S., Cvar, N., Verhovnik, J., Božić, N., Trilar, J., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2022). Rural digital innovation hubs as a paradigm for sustainable business models in europe’s rural areas. Sustainability, 14(21), 14620.

Tajpour, M., Hosseini, E., Ratten, V., Bahman-Zangi, B., & Soleymanian, S. M. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial thinking mediated by social media on the sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises in Iran. Sustainability, 15(5), 4518.

Theeranattapong, T., Pickernell, D., & Simms, C. (2021). The regional innovation system–university–science park nexus: A systematic literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 2017–2050.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2023). Transforming TVET: Building resilient, inclusive and sustainable TVET systems for the future of work. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre.

Verginer, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2021). Talent goes to global cities: The world network of scientists’ mobility. Research Policy, 50(1), 104127.

Viswanathan, R., & Telukdarie, A. (2021). A systems dynamics approach to SME digitalization. Procedia Computer Science, 180, 816–824.

Wolniak, R., Gajdzik, B., Grebski, M., Danel, R., & Grebski, W. W. (2024). Business models used in smart cities—Theoretical approach with examples of smart cities. Smart Cities, 7(4), 1626-1669.

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jmee.v13i1.92875

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Indexed by:

          

 

     

 

  

ISSN: P 2356-4997

         E 2715-4734

 

View My Stats