BUREAUCRATIC AND GENDER REFORM IN DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA

Moh Rahmadoni, Rahdin Rahdin, Romario Rahdian

Abstract


This research wants to get a picture of bureaucratic reform in Semarang city government. This research method uses descriptive qualitative method with the aim of obtaining a complete picture of bureaucratic reform in realizing good governance in Semarang city government. Data analysis. The 1945 amendment has actually replaced the basic law of the Republic of Indonesia. Results and Discussion. The concept of bureaucrats that have been running for a long time in Indonesia, is a bureaucratic concept that functions as patriarchal and traditional, so the concept has changed into a transparent and transparent bureaucracy concept which is guided by the concept of good governance. Conclusion. One that supports bureaucratic reform is as a form of transformation of reforms in all fields, where one of them is the eradication of corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN) in all fields.


Keywords


Bureaucratic; Gender Reform; Development.

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, “Reinventing Government,” New York, NY. J. Leis. Res., vol. 27, 1992.

Agus Dwiyanto, Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah mada University Press, 2006.

Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra, “PENERAPAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP GOOD GOVERNANCE DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN REFORMA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA,” Yuridika, vol. 28, no. 2, 2013.

A. S. Juan J. Linz, roblems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. europe: HU Press, 1996.

P. Bijur, Peter Bijur. 2001.

M. Weber, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.

Bintoro Tjokroamidjojo, Pengantar Administrasi Pembangunan. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1984.

Miftah Thoha, Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.

S. Handayaningrat, Pengantar Studi Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta: CV Haji Masagung, 1998.

B. M. Bass, “Does Transactional - Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries,” ournal Am. Psycologist, vol. 52, pp. 130–139, 1997.

G. Yukl, Leadership in Organisations. Terjemahan Jusuf Udayana Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi. Edisi 3. Jakarta: Penerbit Prenhallindo, 1994.

James MacGregor Burns, Leadership. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

D. J. K. Leithwood, “Transformational Leadership: How Principals Can Help Reform School Cultures,” An Int. J. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, 1990.

Agung Kurniawan, Transformasi Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta, 2006.

Abidin Z, Elektronic Goverment dan Penerapannya di Kabupaten Takalor. yogjakarta: MAPUGM, 2000.

David Osborne & Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government. Tim Pengampu E-Govt. Program Magister Akuntansi Pemerintah Daerah. Yogyakarta: FE-UII, 1992.

D. pada J. 2022, “Diakses pada Januari 2022.” [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/346435365/ESCAP-Mengartikan-Governance-Sebagai-Proses-Pengambilan-Keputusan-Dan-Proses-Diimplementasikan-Atau-Tidak-Diimplementasikannya-Hasil].

E. S. Ahmad Faadhila Addiputra, Faiz Aulia Rahman, Monique Madelin, Putri Ramadini Mumpuni, “Petisi Daring sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Warga Negara di Era Digital.,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 29, no. 2, 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v31i1.29499

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ramadhoni Ramadhoni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.