Ary Yanuarti, A. Sobandi


Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah rendahnya tingkat hasil belajar siswa. Model pembelajaran merupakan  salah satu faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi hasil belajar siswa.  Artikel ini membahas hasil penelitian kuasi eksperimen yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran Quantum Teaching. Design penelitian ini menggunakan Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Quantum Teaching  lebih cocok dalam upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dalam mempelajari Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi, kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasi prosedur pembuatan surat dinas. Dengan demikian, model pembelajaran Quantum Teaching dapat menjadi salah satu alternatif bagi para guru Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi dalam upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi.

Kata Kunci : quantum teaching,  hasil belajar



The problems to be studied in this research was the lack of students’ learning outcomes. Learning model is one of the factors affecting students’ learning outcomes. This article discusses the results of quasi-experimental research aimed to find about the improvement of students’ learning outcomes through the implementation of Quantum Teaching learning model. The research employed nonequivalent control group design. The findings show that the Quantum Teaching learning model is more appropriate for improving students’ learning outcomes in the subject of Correspondence with the basic competence of identifying the procedures of writing official letters. Thus,Quantum Teaching learning model can be made one of the alternatives for teachers of Correspondence Subject in their efforts of improving students’ learning outcomes in this subject.

Keywords: quantum teaching, learning outcomes

Full Text:



Acat, M. B. (2014). An Investigation the Effect of Quantum Learning Approach on Primary School 7th Grade students' Sciencs Achievement, Retention and Attitude. Educational Research Assosiation the International Journal of Reasearch in Teacher Education , 5 (2), 11-23.

Benson, J. &. (1998). Systemic decision application: Linking Learning Outcome assessment to organizational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning , 10 (6), 301-307.

Cary, O. (2003). Towards Improving Student Learning: policy issues and design structures in course-level outcomes assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 (3), 215-227.

Deporter, B. R. (2010). Quantum Teaching. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.

Deslauries, L. (2011). Learning and Retention Quantum. Physisc Education reseacrch , 6 (1), 554-568.

Eom, S. B. (2006). The Determinants of Students Percived Learning Outcomes and Statisfaction in University Online Education: An Emperial Investigation. Decision Sciences of Innovative Education , 4 (2), 215-235.

Froehilch, D., Segers, M. &., & Piet. (2014). Informal Workplace Learning in Austrian Bank: The Influence of Learning Approach, Leadership Style, and Organizazional Learning Outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly , 25 (1), 29-57.

Gobert, J. D. (2010). Introduction to Model Based Teachig and Learning in Science Education. Internasional Journal of Science Education , 22 (9), 891-894.

Grossman, P. (2008). Back to the Future: Directions for Research. American Educational Research Journal , 45 (1), 184-205.

Johnson, C. &. (1998). Student difficulties in Learning Quantum Mechanies. International Journal Science Education , 20 (4), 427-446.

Jordan, M. (1992). Forward Models:Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher. Cognitive Science , 16, 307.

Jungjoo, K. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education , 57, 1512-1520.

Kraiger, K. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 78 (2), 311-328.

Ladd, G. W. (1983). A Cognitive-social Learning model of social-skill training. Psychological Preview , 90 (2), 127-157.

Lile, R. (2014). The Assessment of Learning utcomes. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences , 163, 125-131.

Maher, A. (2004). Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Implications forCurriculum Design and Student Learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education , 3 (2), 47.

McCrindle, A. R. (1995). The Impact of Learning Journal on Metacognitive and Cognitive Processes ang Learning Performance. Learning and Instruction , 5, 167-185.

Nasrallah, R. (2014). Learning Outcome role in higher education teaching. Education, Bissines and Society , 7 (4), 257-267.

Nkhoma, M., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2014). Examing the mediating role of learning engagment, learning process and learning experience on the learning outcome through localized real case studies. Education and Training , 56 (4), 287-302.

Rachmawati, R. (2012). The Implementation Quantum Teaching Method of Graduate Through Up-Grade Hard Skill and Soft Skill. Procedia-Social and Behaviour Sciences , 57 (2), 477-487.

Reich, A. (2015). Is the road to effective assessment of learning outcomes paved with good intentions? Understanding the roadblocks to improving hospitality education. ournal of Hospitality, Leisure, sport & Tourism Education , 18, 21-23.

Riyanto, Y. (2012). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rieneka Cipta.

Sagala, S. (2008). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran . Bandung: Alfabeta.

Shelton, C. D. (2003). From Theory to Practice: Using New Science Concept to Create Learning Organizations. The Learning Organization , 10 (6), 353-360.

Sriarunrasmee, J. (2015). Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Science Learning Outcomes. Procedia- Social and BehaviourSciences , 197, 1721-1726.

Suryani, N. (2013). Improvement of Student History Learning Competence through Quantum learning Model. Journal of Education and Practice , 4 (14), 55-63.

Taber, K. S. (2008). Toward a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science. Science & Education , 17, 179-218.

Tetteh, G. (2015). Improving Learning Outcome using Six Sigman Methodology. Journal International Education in Bussines , 8 (1), 18-36.

Trigwell, K. (1991). Relating Approaches to Study and Quality of Learning Outcome at the Course Level. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 54, 265-275.

Wieman, C. (2011). Learning and Retention of Quantum Concepts with Diffrent Teaching Methods. Physical Education Reserch , 7 (1), 1554-9178.

Yaseer, A. (2014). Learning Quantum Teaching Model with Atong Approach School Program Of Integrated Valid to Imorove Character and Critical Thingking In Probability Material. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education , 5 (2), 85-91.

Yaseer, A. (2014). Learning Quantum Teaching Model With Atong Approach School Program Of Integrated Valid To Improve Character And Critical Thinking In Probability Material. International Conference Mathematic, Science, and Education , 20 (14), 85-91.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3261


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran

Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran   View My Stats