Do Geometry Self-Efficacy and Spatial Anxiety Predict the Attitudes Towards Geometry?
Abstract
Self-efficacy and spatial anxiety towards geometry are stated to be effective to improve teachers' attitudes towards geometry. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the effect of geometry self-efficacy and spatial anxiety on attitude towards geometry. This determines the extent to which the pre-service primary school teachers’ geometry self-efficacy and spatial anxiety predict their attitudes towards geometry. The study used the cross-sectional survey model and the sample was determined with the convenience sampling method. The sample consists of 165 pre-service primary school teachers attending a state university. To collect the data, the geometry self-efficacy scale, the spatial anxiety scale, and the geometry attitude scale were used. Multiple regression analysis was conducted in the data analysis to explain the predictors of the attitude towards geometry. It was found that the pre-service teachers’ geometry self-efficacy beliefs and spatial anxiety were high while their geometry attitude was medium. Their geometry self-efficacy positively and significantly correlated with the attitude towards geometry and negatively and significantly correlated with spatial anxiety. While the sub-dimensions of geometry self-efficacy; positive self-efficacy beliefs, use of geometry knowledge, and negative self-efficacy beliefs had positive effects on the attitude towards geometry, spatial anxiety had a negative effect on the attitude towards geometry.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abalı Öztürk, Y., & Şahin, Ç. (2015). Matematiğe ilişkin akademik başarı, özyeterlilik ve tutum arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesi [Determining the relationships between academic achievement, self-efficacy and attitudes towards maths]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 31, 343–366. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2621
Avcu, R., & Avcu, S. (2015). Turkish adaptation of Utley geometry attitude scale: A validity and reliability study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 8, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.58.1
Ayotola, A., & Adedeji, T. (2009). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.169
Bal, A. P. (2012). Teacher candidates’ geometric thinking levels and attitudes to geometry. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 2(1), 17–34. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ebader/issue/44650/554613
Bayturan, S. (2011). Ortaöğretim matematik eğitiminde bilgisayar destekli öğretimin, öğrencilerin başarıları, tutumları ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algıları üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of computer-assisted instruction in secondary education mathematics on students’ achievemen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.
Bindak, R. (2004). Geometri tutum ölçeği güvenirlik çalışması ve bir uygulama [Study of reliability and validity with an application for geometry attitude scale]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dicle Üniversity, Diyarbakır.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Çağlayan, S. (2010). Lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin geometri dersine yönelik özyeterlik algısı ve tutumunun geometri dersi akademik başarısını yordama gücü [The potential of predictive of the academic achievement points of geometry using the 9th grade students’ geometry self-e. Unpublished Master Thesis, Yıldız Teknik Üniversity, İstanbul.
Canturk-Gunhan, B., & Baser, N. (2007). The development of self-efficacy scale toward geometry. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 68–76. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/1006-published.pdf
Çelik, E. (2012). Matematik problemi çözme başarısı ile üstbilişsel özdüzenleme, matematik özyeterlik ve özdeğerlendirme kararlarının doğruluğu arasındaki ilişkinin [Examining the relationship between success in solving mathematical problems and the accuracy of metacogniti. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Marmara Üniversity, İstanbul.
Duatepe-Paksu, A. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının geometri hazırbulunuşlukları, düşünme düzeyleri, geometriye karşı öz-yeterlikleri ve tutumları [Preservice elementary teachers’ geometry readiness, thinking levels, self-efficacy and attitudes towards geometry]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 33, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE585
Dursun, Ö. (2010). The relationships among the preservice teachers’ spatial visualization ability, geometry self-efficacy, and spatial anxiety. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Erkek, Ö., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2015). Uzamsal kaygı, geometri öz-yeterlik algısı ve cinsiyet değişkenlerinin geometri başarısını yordamadaki roller [The role of spatial anxiety, geometry self-efficacy and gender in predicting geometry achievement]. Elementary Education Online, 14(1), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.18256
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Teachers’ spatial anxiety relates to 1st- and 2nd-graders’ spatial learning. Mind, Brain and Education, 7(3), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12027
Işıksal, M., & Aşkar, P. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencileri için matematik ve bilgisayar özyeterlik algısı ölçekleri [The scales of perceived mathematics and computer self-efficacy for elementary students]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(25), 109–118. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/870-published.pdf
Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J., & Ware, H. (2011). Mathematics achievement: The role of homework and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200206
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11–12), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544230
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı-Ölçme Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü (Ministry of National Education-General Directorate of Assessment, Evaluation and Examination Services). (2016). Uluslararası matematik ve fen eğilimleri araştırması (TIMSS) 2015 ulusal matematik ve fen ön raporu [Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015 National Mathematics and Science Preliminary Report]. MoNE Publications. Ankara.
Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM Publications.
Öztürk, B. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin üstbilişsel farkındalık düzeyi ile matematik öz yeterlik algısının matematik başarısına etkisinin incelenmesi [The analysis of the effect of metacognitive awareness and mathematics self-efficacy perceptions on mathematics achievement]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Eskişehir University, Eskişehir.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193
Papanastasiou, C. (2000). Effects of attitudes and beliefs on mathematics achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-491x(00)00004-3
Sokolowski, H. M., Hawes, Z., & Lyons, I. M. (2019). What explains sex differences in math anxiety? A closer look at the role of spatial processing. Cognition, 182, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.005
Terzi, M., & Mirasyedioğlu, Ş. (2009). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiğe yönelik özyeterlik algılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of department of elementary mathematics teaching students’ perceived mathematics selfefficacy in terms of some variables]. TÜBAV Science Journal, 2(2), 257–265. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tubav/issue/21515/614976
Thompson, K. M. (1993). Geometry students’ attitudes toward mathematics: an empirical investigation of two specific curricular approaches. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, California State University Dominguez Hills, USA.
Tsao, Y. L. (2017). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ attitude towards geometry. US-China Education Review B, 7(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2017.01.002
Ünlü, M., Avcu, S., & Avcu, R. (2010). The relationship between geometry attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs towards geometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.328
Utley, J. G. (2004). Impact of a non-traditional geometry course on prospective elementary teachers’ attitudes and teaching efficacy. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, USA.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
Yenilmez, K., & Uygan, C. (2010). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarına etkisi [The effects of creative drama method on 7th grade students’ self-efficacy beliefs on geometry]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 18(3), 931–942. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefdergi/issue/49056/625884
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy and educational development (pp. 202–231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i2.35914
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats