Email the author 
.png)
.png)
Analysis of STEAM-Based TPACK Integrated Activities in Elementary School Thematic Books
Abstract
Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) can collaborate with the Science Technology Engineering Art Mathematics (STEAM) approach. STEAM is also essential for students to improve their ability and skills to operate and produce science and technology-based products, supported by the TPACK abilities of educators to develop quality technology-based learning. In this study, there were 26 items of integrated TPACK and STEAM activities, with the most findings being content knowledge, as much as 27.50% for science. The second-highest finding was the integration of pedagogical knowledge, as much as 24%. Furthermore, the third most common finding, 17.40%, was the integration of technological knowledge with art and pedagogical content knowledge with art, while 10% of activities integrated content knowledge with art. The last finding found the integration of pedagogical knowledge with science of 3.4%. However, all indicators did not appear mathematical. In addition, the most common finding was the integration of art and pedagogical content knowledge, as much as 34.60%. The percentage of activities integrating engineering and content knowledge was 27%, which was the highest finding. In this case, one activity allows more than one integration.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, J. (2018). Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi (Content Analysis) [Content Analysis Research Design]. Research Gate, 5(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12201.08804
Ayık, Z., & Coştu, B. (2021). A Study on Effects of Multimodal Science Text Design on Meaning-Making of Science Content: Science Teachers’ Perspectives. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i1.31331
Azhar, S., & Muchtar, T. (2022). Implementasi Technology, Pedagogic, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru dalam Pembelajaran pada Masa COVID-19 [Implementation of Teacher Technology, Pedagogic, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Learning during the COVID-19]. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6932–6938. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3413
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23–38.
Cho, B., & Lee, J. (2013). The Effects of Creativity and Flow on Learning through the STEAM Education on Elementary School Contexts. Presentation Materials for the Conference of the Korean Educational Engineers Association, Volume 1, 2013 [한국교육공학회 학술대회발표자료집, 2013권 1호], 206–210.
Cover, B., Jones, J. L., & Watson, A. (2011). Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) Occupations: A Visual Essay. Monthly Lab. Rev, 134.
Firdaus, A. R., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2019). Effect of STEM-based Learning on the Cognitive Skills Improvement. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i2.17562
Gunawan, P., Ernawati, A., Hasnawati, Amrullah, F., & Asmar, S. (2020). Model Pembelajaran STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik [STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) Learning Model With Scientific Approach]. BP-PAUD dan Pendidikan Masyarakat Sulawesi Selatan.
Huda, I. A. (2020). Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar [The Development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the Learning Quality in Primary Schools]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 2(1), 121–125.
Irwan, I., Luthfi, Z. F., & Waldi, A. (2019). Efektifitas Penggunaan Kahoot! untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa [Effectiveness of Using Kahoot! to Improve Student Learning Outcomes]. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1.1866
Ishartono, N., Sutama, Prayitno, H. J., Irfan, M., Waluyo, M., & Sufahani, S. F. Bin. (2021). An Investigation of Indonesian In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perception and Attitude Toward STEAM Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012021
Iskandar, W., & Sunendar, D. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa [Language Learning Strategy]. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kamienski, N., & Radziwill, N. (2018). Design for STEAM: Creating Participatory Art with Purpose. Steam, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20180302.08
Kartini, D., & Widodo, A. (2020). Exploring Elementary Teachers’, Students’ Beliefs and Readiness toward STEAM Education. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i1.22453
Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). Gathering STE(A)M: Policy, Curricular, and Programmatic Developments in Arts-based Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Introduction to the Special Issue of Arts Education Policy Review: STEAM Focus. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1407979
Kemendikbud. (2015). Modul Pelatihan Kurikulum 2013 [2013’s Curriculum Training Module]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kim, D.-H., Ko, D. G., Han, M.-J., & Hong, S.-H. (2014). The Effects of Science Lessons Applying STEAM Education Program on the Creativity and Interest Levels of Elementary Students. Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 34(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.1.1.00043
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators. ICT Integrated Teacher Mducation Models, 1–8.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications.
Liao, C. (2016). From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Lubis, A. B., Miaz, Y., & Putri, I. E. (2019). Influence of the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Primary School Students’ Mathematical Problem-solving Skills. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i2.17984
Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM Education: An Interdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316
Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. Steam, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.201301.34
Melita Rahardjo, M. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Sebagai Pembentuk Keterampilan Proses Sains Anak Usia
Dini [The Implementation of Scientific Approach to Develop Children’s Science Process Skills]. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i2.p148-159
Moleong, L. J. (1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif [Methodology of Qualitative Research]. Remadja Karya.
Mu’minah, H. L., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020). implementasi STEAM (Science, Technology, Arts and Matematics) dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 [implementation of STEAM (Science, Technology, Arts and Mathematics) in 21st Century Learning]. Jurnal Bio Education, 5(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31949/be.v5i1.2105
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 [2013’s Curriculum Development and Implementation]. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nabilah, L. N., & Nana. (2020). Pengembangan Keterampilan Abad 21 Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Menggunakan Model Creative Problem Solving [Development of 21st Century Skills in Physics Learning in High Schools Using the Creative Problem Solving Model]. In OSF (p. 108).
Naila, I. (2020). The Effectiveness of Science Project Learning based on Entrepreneurship Model to Improve Elementary Students’ Collaborative Skills. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i3.28676
Nasella, R., Sutarjo, A., & Wardana, D. (2019). Analisis Bahan Ajar Tematik Terpadu Tema Bumiku 6H untuk SD/MI Kelas VI Penerbit Erlangga Subtema Perbedaan Waktu dan Pengaruhnya [Analysis of Integrated Thematic Teaching Materials of the "6H Bumiku" Theme in the "Differences in Time and Its Effects" Sub-Theme for Fifth Grade SD/MI on A Book Published by Penerbit Erlangga]. Kimalaya, 7(2), 1–16.
Oster, A., & Peled, Y. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Pre-service Teacher Education: Research in Progress. In L. Uden, Y.-H. Tao, H.-C. Yang, & I.-H. Ting (Eds.), The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (pp. 41–47). Springer Netherlands.
Pratama, F. D. (2013). Peran Keterampilan Komunikasi Interpersonal Untuk Tercapainya Tujuan Kurikulum 2013 [The Role of Interpersonal Communication Skills for Achieving the 2013 Curriculum Goals]. In N. Hanifah & Julia (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar (pp. 177–188). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Sumedang.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
Rahmadi, I. F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21 [Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): 21st Century Teacher Knowledge Framework]. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.32493/jpkn.v6i1.y2019.p65-74
Raihan. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian [Research Methods]. Universitas Islm.
Rondhi, M. (2017). Apresiasi Seni dalam Konteks Pendidikan Seni [Appreciation of Art in the Context of Art Education]. Imajinasi, 11(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v11i1.11182
Rumbewas, S. S., Laka, B. M., & Meokbun, N. (2018). Peran Orang Tua Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik di SD Negeri Saribi [The Role of Parents in Improving Students’ Learning Motivation at SD Negeri Saribi]. Jurnal EduMatSains, 2(2), 201–212. http://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/edumatsains/article/view/607
Samsu. (2021). Metode Penelitian : Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantittif, dan Mix Method serta Research and Development [Research Methods: Theory and Application of Qualitative, Quantitative Research, Mixed Methods, and Research & Development]. Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan (PUSAKA) Jambi.
Sardiman, A. M. (2013). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar [Interaction and Motivation in Teaching and Learning]. Rajawali Pers.
Sari, I. P., & Syamsi, K. (2015). Pengembangan Buku Pelajaran Tematik-Integratif berbasis Nilai Karakter Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab di Sekolah Dasar [Development of Thematic-Integrative Textbooks based on Discipline and Responsibility Values in Elementary School]. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 3(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v3i1.4070
Selly, P. B. (2017). Teaching STEM Outdoors: Activities for Young Children. Redleaf Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mUdXvgAACAAJ
Septiani, N. L. W., & Yuliarto, B. (2016). Review—The Development of Gas Sensor Based on Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 163(3), B97–B106. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0591603jes
Setiawan, D. A. (2013). Analisis Buku Teks Tema Makananku Sehat dan Bergizi Pada Siswa Kelas IV di SDN Kebonsari 02 Kota Malang Pada Kurikulum 2013 [Textbook Analysis of the "My Food is Healthy and Nutritious" Theme for Fourth Grade Students at SDN Kebonsari 02 Malang City in the 2013 Curriculum]. In N. Hanifah & Julia (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar (pp. 324–331). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Sumedang.
Shadiq, F. (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika: Cara Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa [Learning Mathematics: How to Improve Students’ Thinking Ability]. Graha Ilmu.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 51(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Siagian, M. D. (2016). Kemampuan Koneksi Matematik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika [Mathematical Connection Ability in Mathematics Learning]. MES: Journal of Matematics Education and Science2, 2(1), 58–67.
Sidiq, U., & Choiri, M. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan [Qualitative Research Methods in Education]. CV Nata Karya.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.
Starzinski, A. (2017). Foundational Elements Of A Steam Learning Model For Elementary School [Hamline University]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.co.id/&httpsredir=1&article=5299&context=hse_all
STEM Task Force Report. (2014). Innovate: A Blueprint for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education. Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation.
Suryadi, S. (2019). Peranan Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran Dan Perkembangan Dunia Pendidikan [The Role of the Development of Information and Communication Technology in Learning Activities and the Development of the World of Education]. Informatika: Jurnal Ilmiah AMIK Labuhan Batu, 3(3), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.36987/informatika.v3i3.219
Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2015). Arts Education, Academic Achievement and Cognitive Ability. In P. P. L. Tinio & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.018
Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2013). Pendidikan STEM dalam Entrepreneurial Science Thinking “ESciT”: Satu Perkongsian Pengalaman dari UKM untuk Aceh [STEM Education in Entrepreneurial Science Thinking “ESciT”: A Sharing of Experiences from SMEs for Aceh]. Aceh Development International Conference 2013, 105–112.
Tara, M. D. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Number Head Together (NHT) Dalam Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Pada Kelas V SDN Bakalan Krajan 1 Malang [Application of the Number Head Together (NHT) Learning Model in Student Learning Activities in Thematic Learning in Fifth Grade at SDN Bakalan Krajan 1 Malang]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PGSD, 3(November), 504. https://conference.unikama.ac.id/artikel/index.php/pgsd/article/view/55
Tarigan, R. (2021). Perkembangan Matematika Dalam Filsafat Dan Aliran Formalisme Yang Terkandung Dalam Filsafat Matematika [The Development of Mathematics in Philosophy and Formalism Contained in the Philosophy of Mathematics]. Sepren, 2(2), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v2i2.508
Triwati. (2021). Penerapan Metode Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menentukan Pokok Pikiran dalam Teks pada Siswa Kelas V [Application of the Inquiry Method to Improve the Ability to Determine Main Thoughts in Texts for the Fifth Grade Students]. Jurnal Educatio, 7(4), 1447–1454. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1519
Wang, Q. (2019). Developing a Technology-supported Learning Model for Elementary Education Level. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15901
Warahmah, M. (2022). The Important of Language Learning in the Curriculum of 2013. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 1(4), 1019–1024.
Watulingas, K. H., Cendana, W., & Araini, T. K. (2022). Peran Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Belajar Siswa SD [The Role of Technological Pedadogical Content Knowledge in Meeting the Learning Needs of Elementary Students]. Jurnal Ilmiah KONTEKSTUAL, 3(02), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v3i02.610
Zufriady, & Kurniaman, O. (2019). The Effectiveness of Learning Basic Concepts of Art for Primary Teacher Education Students Using Nomor Acak Learning Model. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i2.49131
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats