The effectiveness of the Connect, Investigation, Analysis and Conclusion (CIAC) learning model in Promoting students’ Understanding on the Roles of Empirical Evidence in Science

Anugrah Ramadhan Firdaus, Asep Samsudin, Ari Widodo

Abstract


This study aims to look at the effectiveness of the Connect, Investigation, Analyze and Conclution (CIAC) learning model on the Nature of Science (NOS) abilities of elementary school students on empirical characteristics. The research method used was a pre-experimental design with a One Group Pretest-Posttest Design with 38 elementary school students in Bandung Regency as the subject of research. Data collection methods used are questionnaires and observation. Meanwhile, to analyze the data using the normality test, homogeneity test, t test and gain test. The results showed that the average NOS pretest score of students on empirical properties was 2,56 and the average posttest NOS score of students on empirical properties was 2,86 this resulted in a gain value of 0,21. Based on the above results, the CIAC learning model can improve students' NOS abilities in the empirical aspect in elementary schools, especially girls if seen from the increase. In addition, students' interest in science is an important point in the acquisition of students' NOS abilities.


Keywords


Empiric, Nature of Science, Elementary School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Teaching With and About Nature of Science, and Science Teacher Knowledge Domains. Science and Education, 22(9), 2087–2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10143

Barwise, P. (1995). Good Empirical Generalizations. Marketing Science, 14(3_supplement), G29–G35. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.g29

Chi, S. H., Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Zhu, L. (2017). Associations among attitudes, perceived difficulty of learning science, gender, parents’ occupation and students’ scientific competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2171–2188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1366675

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (4 ed., Vol. 4). Pearson. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d5ZzlgJuCrwAyLpdBeK5dhKMZTpE2HNb/view

Firdaus, A. R., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2020). Engineering design behavior elementary student’s through the STEM approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511, 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012089

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Educational research: An introduction. In Qualitative Voices in Educational Research. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008064-1

Hansson, L., Leden, L., & Thulin, S. (2021). Nature of science in early years science teaching. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(5), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1968463

Jumanto, & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Oleh Siswa Dan Guru Sd di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi pendidikan, 2(1), 20–31.

Kahana, O., & Tal, T. (2014). Understanding of high-achieving science students on the nature of science. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0013-5

Kelly, N. (2014). Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School: A Project-Based Approach. In Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning (Vol. 8, Nomor 1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1489

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Ladachart, L. (2019). Thai Science Educators’ Perspectives on Students’ Prior Knowledge: A Documentary Research. Science Education International, 30(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i2.5

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology (IJEMST), 1(3), 138–147. www.ijemst.com

Lestari, H. (2020). Peningkatan Pemahaman Nature of Science (Nos) Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Efikasi Diri. Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 2(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v2i2.146

Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students’ Career Aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060

McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3

Nurdyansyah, & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi Model. In Nizmania Learning Center.

Sandi, M. (2017). Hubungan Efikasi Diri Dengan Minat Belajar Siswa-Siswi. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 5(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v5i2.4365

Stevi, S., & Haryanto, H. (2020). Need Analysis of Audio-Visual Media Development to Teach Digestive System for Elementary School. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.672104

Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52–57.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i2.54333

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats