Power In Donald Trumpt’s Speech Recognition: Critical Discourse Approach

Jauhar Helmie, Vina Nurviyani, Aditya Restu Yoga Ardhika

Abstract


This study aims to investigate what power used in Donald Trump’s speech about recognition Jerusalem as part of Israel State. Donald Trump’s emergences as famous leader in the developed country in the world. In analysis of power in critical discourse, it uses Fairclough (2014) as a main theory. This study applied qualitative research design. The technique of the data collections used in this research was descriptive qualitative analysis. The data analysis of this study used Critical Discourse Analysis method. There are two findings of this study. It is to explain the power used by Donald Trump and to find out the representation as social actors of power and weakness in Donald Trump’s speech. The specific focus was on how the using of power and the representative of his power and weakness as social actors to influences others view or perspective. In his speech, he showed his power with using his pronounce to influenced others. It happened because he wants to recognize Jerusalem to be Israel state. Besides that, it tells the social actor network as the framework, and decontextualizes the representations of social actors implemented by Donald Trump in creating a specific reality for his audience for establishing and legitimizing his own status and his power through the interaction and production of the reality. Actually, this study is not only told about the serves of power in critical discourse analysis, but also it enables a better understanding.


Keywords


Critical Discourse Analysis; Donald Trump’s speeches; Power; Political purposes; Qualitative analysis; Social Actors;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis and Identity: why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 225– 259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740590 042000302085

Amoussou, F., & Allagbe, A. A. (2018). Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal on Studies inEnglishLanguageand Literature,6(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347- 3134.0601002

Anggraini, N., & Fidiyanti, M. (2019). Transitivity Process and Ideological Construction of Donald Trump‟s Speeches. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching.

Archambault, L. (2016). Exploring the use of qualitative methods to examine TPACK. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & M. Punya (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group.

Arts, F. O. F. (2018). Transitivity Process and Ideological Construction of Donald Trump's Speeches.

Asghar, J. (2014). Language Power and Ideology in Commercial Discourse: A Prologue to Critical Discourse Analysis for Neophyte Analysts. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.201 4.v3n4p225

Benard, O. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Announcement Speech. (November).

Buchori. (2016). An Analysis of Critical Discourse Analysis in Donald Trump’s Campaign in U.S Election.

Cahyono, S. P. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's Speech. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of By : Setyo Prasiyanto Cahyono English Department , Faculty of Humanities.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2009). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded of power theory. Los Angeles: CA: SAGE Publication.

Cresswel,J.W.(2009).Researchdesign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publication.

Darweesh, A. D., & Abdullah, N. M. (2016). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump‟s Sexist Power and Ideology. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 87– 95.

Helmie J; Suganda Dadang; Heriyanto. (2020). Evident and Epistemic American New Balance and Segway. Sociotech, ITB, 19(2), 292–299.

Helmie, J. (2015). Verb Go ( back to , on , and out ) in English for TEFL in the Novel of New Moon by Stephenie Meyer : The Syntactic and Semantic Analysis. Educare, 7(February), 123–134.

Hussain, S. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis : Demystifying the Fuzziness The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies Critical Discourse Analysis : Demystifying the Fuzziness. (March).

Khosravinik, M. (2016).Critical Discourse Analysis , Power. (January 2014).

Lauritzen, S., & Fisker, M. (2009). Power in discourse.

Lin, A. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics: A Methodological Review.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34 (March 2014), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719 0514000087

Mcclay, R. (2017). Us and Them in Power : (March).

Mcclay,R. (2016). A Descriptive Analysis of Donald Trump’s Campaign Speeches. A Descriptive Analysis of Donald Trump’s Campaign Speeches, (December), 1– 8. Retrieved from http://www.eurozine.com/article s/2016-12-06-malakhov- en.html

Mendoza, R. C. (2015). The Ideology of Tri-People: A Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ij e.v15i1.1059

Mohammadi, M. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Language and Power Use in US Presidential Campaign, 2016. 6(5). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijale l.v.6n.5p.1

Mohammadi, M., & Javadi, J. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump‟s Language and Power Use in US Presidential Campaign, 2016. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijale l.v.6n.5p.1

O’Regan, J. P., & Betzel, A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Sample Study of Extremism. Research Methods in Intercultural Communication, (December 2015), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119 166283.ch19

Pinho, L. B. de, Kantorski, L. P., & Bañon Hernández, A. M. (2009). Critical Discourse Analysis: New Possibilities for Scientific Research in the Language and Power. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17(1), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692009000100020

Rachman, A., & Yunianti, S. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis in Donald Trump Presidential Campaign To Win American‟S Heart. TELL Journal, 5(2), 8–17.

Reg, B. H. (2017).Motto and dedication Don’t put till tomorrow what you can do today The happiness will come to you if you have kindness Never ask someone before try by yourself This thesis is dedicated to My most beloved mother and father Masati and Syamsul. (40300113051).

Turhan, B. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis of Advertising Implications for Language Teacher Education. International Journal of Languages Education, 1(Volume 5 Issue 4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.23 01

Wijaya, F. R., & Helmie, J. (2019). an Analysis of Directive Speech Acts in the Fault in Our Stars Movie Script. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v7i1.300




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v8i1.68014

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, is published by UPI Press in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

 Lisensi Creative Commons

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan of Indonesia University of Education disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Berdasarkan ciptaan pada https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/mimbardik/.

View My Stats