Email this article 
Enhancing Students' Speaking Skills through Pedagogical Technologies: A Modern Approach to Language Instruction
Abstract
This paper explores the application of pedagogical technologies in enhancing students' speaking skills, emphasizing the importance of integrating modern educational approaches in language instruction. As Uzbekistan continues to reform its education system, the development of students’ oral and written communication becomes a key priority in shaping competent, expressive individuals. The study reviews various teaching methods—including traditional, systematic, and technological approaches—highlighting how each influences speech development. Special attention is given to the role of speech conditions, logical coherence, expressiveness, and grammatical accuracy in effective communication. By aligning instructional methods with students’ needs and leveraging technological advancements, educators can create more engaging, interactive learning environments. The paper concludes that a well-structured, technology-integrated pedagogical system can significantly improve students' language performance and support their personal and intellectual growth.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215-1234.
Bicen, H., and Beheshti, M. (2022). Assessing perceptions and evaluating achievements of ESL students with the usage of infographics in a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(3), 498-526.
Buzzard, C., Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., and McCarty, P. (2011). The use of digital technologies in the classroom: A teaching and learning perspective. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 131-139.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., and Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51.
Class, B. (2024). Teaching research methods in education: using the TPACK framework to reflect on praxis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(3), 288-308.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.
Ertmer, P. A., and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
García-Carmona, A., and Acevedo-Díaz, J. A. (2018). The nature of scientific practice and science education: rationale of a set of essential pedagogical principles. Science & Education, 27(5), 435-455.
Ghaleb, B. D. S. (2024). Effect of exam-focused and teacher-centered education systems on students’ cognitive and psychological competencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(2), 611-631.
Gyasi, J. F., Zheng, L., and Zhou, Y. (2021). Perusing the past to propel the future: A systematic review of STEM learning activity based on activity theory. Sustainability, 13(16), 8828.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., and Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285.
Hew, K. F., and Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252.
Hirumi, A. (2002). Student-centered, technology-rich learning environments (SCenTRLE): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 497-537.
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., and Perfetti, C. (2012). The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction framework: Bridging the science‐practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757-798.
Kramsch, C. (2006). The multilingual subject. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 97-110.
Lawless, K. A., and Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
Liando, N. V., Tatipang, D. P., Rorimpandey, R., and Karisi, Y. (2022). Easing the rules of health protocols: A critical discourse analysis of Indonesian president’s speech on Covid-19 handling in 2022. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 10(1), 127-145.
Messer, M., Brown, N. C., Kölling, M., and Shi, M. (2024). Automated grading and feedback tools for programming education: A systematic review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(1), 1-43.
Morris, R., Perry, T., and Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.
Ramorola, M. Z. (2013). Challenge of effective technology integration into teaching and learning. Africa Education Review, 10(4), 654-670.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.
Shao, K., Nicholson, L. J., Kutuk, G., and Lei, F. (2020). Emotions and instructed language learning: Proposing a second language emotions and positive psychology model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2142.
Singun, A. J. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37.
Vuojärvi, H., Eriksson, M., and Vartiainen, H. (2019). Cross-boundary collaboration and problem-solving to promote 21st century skills—students’ experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(13), 30-60.
Zhai, C., and Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v6i1.82955
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kantor Jurnal dan Publikasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research (IJOMR) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)