PROBLEMATIKA PERSIAPAN DAN PELAKSANAAN UJIAN DISERTASI: SURVEY PADA MAHASISWA PROGRAM DOKTOR UNIVERISTAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

Kokom Komalasari, Tati Narawati

Abstract


The research objective is to describe and analyze students' understanding of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Dissertation Examination. The research used survey method, data collection techniques using a questionnaire with the help of the Google form application, and the analysis of quantitative data using descriptive statistics. The research subjects were 51 Doctoral Program students at the UPI graduate school who graduated in the 2020/2021 academic year. The results show that the majority of doctoral students understand the SOP for the implementation of the dissertation exam, doctoral students have problems with dissertation writing with similarity below 20%. Doctoral students have difficulty in obtaining a predetermined foreign language score, students have problems related to the duration of the dissertation review time. provided by the commission team. Doctoral students have difficulty in making reputable journal articles and finding international journals that are appropriate to the field being studied, besides that there are also difficulties with the article submission process, experiencing difficulties in the revision process until the article is published. In terms of student readiness of the Stage 1 Exam Implementation and the Promotional Examination, doctoral students did not experience any problems or obstacles.


Keywords


Examination Problems, Postgraduate UPI, Student Dissertation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98.

Idrus. (2019). Evaluasi dalam proses pembelajaran. ADAARA: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 920–935.

Kafrawi, F. R., & Sodiq, S. (2021). The analysis of service satisfaction level in the implementation of teacher professional education program in 2020. Education and Human Development Journal, 6(1), 18–30.

Kurniawati, E. W. (2021). Evaluasi program pendidikan perspektif model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Jurnal GHAITSA Islamic Education Jurnal, 2(1), 19-25.

Reginasari, A., Afiatin, T., Patria, B., & Komariah, K. (2020). Digital monitoring experience in digital media and the internet. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 452, 27–32.

Setiawan, & Qodariyah, L. (2019). Pengembangan manajemen perpustakaan sebagai pusat informasi dan pendidikan di STAIMA Al-Hikam Malang. EVALUASI, 3(2), 253–272.

Srinivasacharlu, A. (2019). Continuing Professional Development (CPD) of teacher educators in 21st Century. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 29–33.

Sulistiyarini, D., & Sabirin, F. (2020). 21st century literacy skill of information technology and computer education students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(4), 576-585.

Supriyadi, E., Indro, H. Y., Priyanto, E., & Surwi, F. (2020). Students’ evaluation on teaching in vocational and technical schools. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 621–636.

Winarsih, S. (2017). Kebijakan dan implementasi manajemen pendidikan tinggi dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan, 15(1), 51-66.

Yahya, A., Risnawati, & Kurniawati, Y. (2021). Evaluasi model CIPP pada pelaksanaan program Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Wustha di SMP Negeri 1 Rambah. AL-QALAM Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan, 13(2), 46–54.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v29i1.45847

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free hit counter
View My Stats