Ketepatan Kontruksi Butir Pilihan Ganda Bahasa Arab

Muhibbatul Laili

Abstract


The study of construct validity on summative test items in multiple-choice Arabic aims to improve the test items' quality to make them valid in the construction aspect. The study was carried out on multiple-choice items based on the modified construction criteria instrument based on the Guttman scale. Items that match the indicator are marked with S and TS if they do not match. Based on a review of 40 items, it was found that the items were not suitable, namely: 25 items with unformulated stem clearly and firmly, two questions that pointed to the correct answer, and one question with pictures that confused. Meanwhile, other items are in accordance with all construct criteria indicators for multiple-choice questions. Based on the research results, the question maker must correct and pay attention to these aspects to produce a valid test kit.

Keywords


Construct; Multiple choice; Summatif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Fathiyah, S. F. (2019). Analisis butir soal pelajaran bahasa Arab di MA Roudhotul Ulum Pagak Malang. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah, 4(1), 76-100.

Am, Z. (2018). Teknik penilaian hasil pembelajaran. Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pencerahan, 14 (2), 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/rf.v14i02.901

Antipkina, I., & Ludlow, L.H. (2020). Parental involvement as a holistic concept using Rasch/Guttman scenario scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0734282920903164

Anwar, S. & Fakhruddin, A. (2016). Pelaksanaan standar penilaian oleh guru pendidikan agama Islam di sekolah (studi evaluatif terhadap guru PAI SMP dan SMA di Bandung). Ta’lim: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 14(2), 139-155.

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI.

Broadbent, J. Panadero, E., & Boud, D. (2017). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom, theory into practice, 55(2), 153-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

Fauziah, I.R.N. (2020). Analisis kualitas tes bahasa Arab berbasis higher order thinking skill (HOTS). Lisanuna, 10(1), 45-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ls.v10i1.7805

Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Bakeman, R. (2017). Exploringthe utility of sequential analysis in studying informal formative assessment practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice Spring, 36 (1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12143

Hakim, R., Nugraha, A.C. (2016). Tingkat kecurangan tes online dibandingkan dengan tes tertulis di SMK Negeri 2 Yogyakarta, Prodi Pendidikan Elektro: E-Journal Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 6 (3), 36-41.

Hawe, E. & Dixon, H. (2016). Assesment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360

Hikmah, M.U. (2019). Pengembangan tes sumatif bahasa Jerman semester ganjil kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Taman. Laterne: Jurnal Mahasiswa Unesa, 8(2), 1-21.

Maulana, D. & Sanusi, A. (2020). Analisis butir soal bahasa Arab ujian akhir madrasah bersama daerah (UAMBD) madrasah ibtidaiyah tahun 2017-2018. Ta'lim al-'Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 4(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpba.v4i1.8054

Pratama, D. (2020). Analisis kualitas tes buatan guru melalui pendekatan item response theory (IRT) model rasch. Tarbawy: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 7(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v7i1.1187

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Panduan penilaian tertulis. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Shin, J., Bulut, O., & Griel, M.J. (2019). The effect of the most-attractive-distractor location on multiple choice item difficulty. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1629577

Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, Lan., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Dona, K.L., Eichhorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deneen, C., Diego, J.S., & Gibson, D. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58–71.

Suharismi, A. (2011). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Syihabuddin. (2018). Tes dan evaluasi pengajaran bahasa. Bandung: UPI Press.

Tempelaar D., Rienties, B., Mittelmeier, J., & Nguyen, Q. (2017). Student profiling in a dispositional learning analytics application using formative assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.010




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v3i2.25272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.