Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is a peer-reviewed, open-access academic journal dedicated to advancing original research in history education and historical studies. The journal aims to promote rigorous historical inquiry, critical historiographical analysis, methodological innovation, and the development of historical knowledge and understanding.

The journal welcomes scholarly research in the following areas:

  1. History Education in Schools: History teaching and learning, curriculum, assessment, historical thinking, historical literacy, textbooks, and educational technology.

  2. History Education in Higher Education: History teacher education, curriculum development, historical research competencies, and pedagogical innovation.

  3. Public History and History Education for the Public: Museums, cultural heritage, oral history, collective memory, digital public history, and community engagement.

  4. Historical Studies: Local, national, transnational, global, and thematic history, including political, social, economic, cultural, intellectual, colonial, environmental, and other historical fields.

  5. History of Education: Historical developments in educational institutions, policies, practices, reforms, and educational thought.

  6. History in Social Studies Education: The integration of historical perspectives, historical inquiry, and historical thinking into interdisciplinary social studies education.

HISTORIA welcomes historical, empirical, theoretical, and interdisciplinary research that demonstrates originality, methodological rigor, critical analysis, and a clear scholarly contribution. Manuscripts from related disciplines must demonstrate a substantive connection to history or history education.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah applies a double-blind peer-review process, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from one another to ensure impartiality, confidentiality, and academic integrity. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal's focus and scope, originality, methodological quality, compliance with author guidelines, and adherence to publication ethics.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject area. Reviewers assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:

  1. Relevance to the journal's focus and scope.

  2. Originality, research gap, and scholarly contribution.

  3. Quality and critical engagement with relevant literature.

  4. Appropriateness and transparency of research methods.

  5. Credibility of historical sources or empirical research evidence.

  6. Depth of analysis, interpretation, and discussion.

  7. Clarity of conclusions and their contribution to historical knowledge or history education.

  8. Academic writing quality, citation accuracy, and compliance with publication ethics.

Based on the reviewers' evaluations, the editor may accept the manuscript, request revisions, require resubmission for further review, or reject the submission.

Authors receiving revision requests must submit a revised manuscript accompanied by a point-by-point response to reviewers' comments. Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.

The final publication decision is made by the responsible editor based on the reviewers' recommendations, the quality of the manuscript, the adequacy of revisions, and the journal's editorial standards.

Reviewers and editors must maintain confidentiality, disclose potential conflicts of interest, and provide fair, objective, and constructive evaluations. Manuscripts must not be used or disclosed for personal or professional advantage. HISTORIA is committed to maintaining a transparent, rigorous, and ethical peer-review process in accordance with internationally recognized scholarly publishing standards.


 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

The Aim of Journal

The journal welcomes articles which are research-based and from reflective, critiques and comparative studies on history. The journal aims especially but not necessary limited to scholars of history and history education from Southeast Asia Countries. Scholars from other parts of Asia, Australia, Africa, America and Europe are equally welcome to contribute to this journal.

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

(Based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journals published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia is a process of permanent knowledge improvement. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals.

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia takes their duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognise our ethical and other responsibilities.

We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

DUTIES OF AUTHOR(S)

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

DUTIES OF EDITOR

Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working in conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interest.

 

Author Fees / Article Processing Charges (APC) Policy

Author Fees / Article Processing Charges (APC) Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to maintaining transparency and fairness in its publication fee policy.

1. Article Processing Charges

HISTORIA applies an Article Processing Charge (APC) of IDR 750,000 per accepted article.

The APC supports editorial administration, manuscript production, journal website maintenance, digital publication, and other operational activities associated with scholarly publishing.

2. Submission and Peer-Review Fees

HISTORIA does not charge authors for initial manuscript submission or peer review.

The APC is payable only after the manuscript has been formally accepted for publication.

3. Editorial Independence

Payment of the APC does not guarantee manuscript acceptance or publication.

All manuscripts undergo editorial screening and double-blind peer review in accordance with the journal's editorial policies.

Editorial decisions are based on scholarly originality, methodological rigor, research quality, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's focus and scope, regardless of the authors' ability to pay.

4. Payment Procedures

Authors of accepted manuscripts will receive official payment instructions from the journal's editorial office.

Payments must be made only through payment channels officially designated by HISTORIA or its managing institution.

Authors are advised not to make payments based on unofficial requests or communications.

5. Fee Transparency

HISTORIA is committed to providing clear information about applicable publication charges before authors submit their manuscripts.

No additional publication-related charges will be imposed without prior disclosure and notification to the authors.

6. Reader Access

All published articles are freely accessible to readers without subscription fees or payment requirements, in accordance with the journal's Open Access Policy.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to maintaining academic integrity and preventing plagiarism in all published manuscripts. The journal requires authors to submit original scholarly work and properly acknowledge all sources, ideas, quotations, and research materials used in their manuscripts.

1. Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism includes presenting another person's words, ideas, research findings, historical interpretations, data, or other intellectual contributions as one's own without appropriate acknowledgment.

Forms of plagiarism may include:

  • Direct copying of text without proper quotation and citation.

  • Paraphrasing another author's ideas without acknowledgment.

  • Using historical evidence, archival interpretations, or research findings without appropriate attribution.

  • Reproducing tables, figures, or other scholarly materials without proper acknowledgment or necessary permission.

  • Submitting previously published material as new research without appropriate disclosure (text recycling or redundant publication).

2. Similarity Screening

All submitted manuscripts undergo similarity screening using Turnitin or other appropriate similarity-detection software before entering the peer-review process.

HISTORIA applies a maximum overall similarity threshold of 20% as an initial editorial screening criterion. Manuscripts exceeding this threshold may be returned to authors for clarification or revision or may be rejected following editorial assessment.

A similarity score of 20% or below does not automatically establish that a manuscript is free from plagiarism. Likewise, a score exceeding 20% does not necessarily indicate plagiarism.

Editorial decisions are based on qualitative examination of the similarity report, including the nature, extent, and context of textual overlap.

3. Assessment of Historical Sources

Because historical research frequently relies on quotations from primary sources, archival documents, historical newspapers, official records, and other documentary materials, HISTORIA distinguishes properly attributed historical evidence from unattributed textual reproduction.

The editorial team considers the following factors when evaluating similarity reports:

  • Properly cited direct quotations and historical source excerpts.

  • Reference lists, bibliographic information, and standard methodological expressions.

  • Commonly used historical terminology and established names of institutions or events.

  • Substantial textual overlap with previously published scholarly works.

  • Inadequate paraphrasing, missing citations, and unattributed reproduction of interpretations or findings.

Appropriately attributed historical quotations may be excluded from similarity calculations where the screening software permits, but they remain subject to editorial evaluation.

4. Editorial Procedures

When potentially problematic textual overlap is identified, the editorial team may:

  1. Request clarification and supporting evidence from the author.

  2. Require appropriate citation, paraphrasing, or manuscript revision.

  3. Conduct additional similarity screening after revision.

  4. Reject manuscripts containing substantial plagiarism or other serious breaches of academic integrity.

  5. Refer serious or unresolved cases to the procedures established in the journal's Allegations of Research Misconduct Policy.

5. Plagiarism Identified After Publication

If plagiarism is suspected after publication, HISTORIA will investigate the allegation in accordance with its publication ethics policies.

Depending on the findings and severity of the violation, the journal may publish a correction, expression of concern, or retraction, following relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

6. Authors' Responsibilities

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts are original, that all borrowed materials are properly acknowledged, and that the manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere in a manner that constitutes redundant publication.

Authors must accurately cite historical sources and relevant scholarship and must not fabricate quotations, archival references, or bibliographic information.

 

Journal Archiving

Open Journal Systems supports the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system to ensure secure and permanent preservation of your journal. You have several options for including your journal in a LOCKSS network:

PKP Private LOCKSS Network

Any OJS journal that has an ISSN and has published at least one article can choose to agree to the terms of use and be preserved in the PKP PLN at no cost.

To join, go to Generic Plugins, find PKP PLN Plugin, select Enable, and then select Settings, and accept the Terms of Use. Your content will then be automatically included in the network. No further action is required.

Other LOCKSS Networks

If you believe you have access to one or more of the LOCKSS networks listed here, please contact the appropriate LOCKSS Network administrator to apply for inclusion. Completing the form below will allow for inclusion of your journal in those networks. No content will be preserved before you have notified the appropriate network.

 

 

 

 

 

Open Access Policy

Open Access Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is a peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal committed to promoting the free and equitable dissemination of research in history education and historical studies.

1. Immediate Open Access

HISTORIA provides immediate open access to all published articles. Readers may access, read, download, and share published scholarly content without subscription fees, registration requirements, or payment barriers.

The journal does not impose an embargo period on published articles.

2. Open Access Licensing

Articles published in HISTORIA are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

This license permits users to copy, distribute, and adapt published articles, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given and adaptations are distributed under the same or a compatible license as permitted by Creative Commons.

The license terms are available at:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

3. Copyright and Authors' Rights

Authors retain copyright over their published articles and grant HISTORIA the right of first publication.

Authors may share and deposit their published articles in institutional repositories, subject repositories, personal academic websites, and other scholarly platforms, provided that the original publication in HISTORIA is appropriately acknowledged.

4. Accessibility and Knowledge Dissemination

HISTORIA supports the broad dissemination of historical scholarship and history education research to academics, teachers, students, researchers, policymakers, and the general public.

The journal encourages the responsible use of published research for teaching, scholarly discussion, public history initiatives, and further academic investigation.

5. Article Processing Charges

Open access to published articles is free for readers. Any article processing charges applicable to authors are disclosed separately in the journal's Author Fees or Article Processing Charges Policy.

Payment of publication fees does not determine editorial acceptance. All manuscripts are evaluated according to the journal's editorial standards and peer-review procedures.

6. Digital Preservation

HISTORIA recognizes the importance of long-term access to scholarly publications and maintains a separate Electronic Archiving Policy describing its digital preservation arrangements.

The journal is committed to supporting the continued accessibility and integrity of its published scholarly record.

 

Authorship Criteria

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah requires all listed authors to have made substantial scholarly contributions to the manuscript. Authorship must meet the following criteria:

  1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the study, collection or interpretation of historical sources or research data, or analysis of findings.

  2. Drafting the manuscript or critically revising its intellectual content.

  3. Approval of the final version submitted for publication.

  4. Agreement to take responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the published work.

All four criteria must be fulfilled. Individuals who contribute to the research but do not meet these requirements should be acknowledged rather than listed as authors.

Gift authorship, guest authorship, and ghost authorship are prohibited. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all authors approve the manuscript and agree to its submission.

Any changes to authorship after submission must be justified in writing, approved by all affected authors, and authorized by the editorial team.

Generative artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as authors.

 

Ethics Statement

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

(Based on Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)'s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journals published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia is process of permanent knowledge improvement. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals.

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia takes their duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognise our ethical and other responsibilities.

We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

Duties of authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties of editors

Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working in conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interest.

 

Copyright and Licensing Policy.

Copyright and Licensing Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to protecting authors' intellectual property rights while supporting the open dissemination, accessibility, and responsible reuse of scholarly knowledge.

1. Copyright Ownership

Authors retain copyright over their published articles.

By submitting and agreeing to publish their manuscripts in HISTORIA, authors grant the journal the right of first publication and permission to publish, distribute, preserve, and make the final published version publicly accessible through the journal's official platform and relevant scholarly indexing and archiving services.

2. Creative Commons License

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Historia is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Articles published in HISTORIA are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Under this license, readers and other users are permitted to:

  • Share: Copy and redistribute the published material in any medium or format.

  • Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial purposes.

These permissions are subject to the following conditions:

  • Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit to the original authors, provide a link to the license, and indicate whether changes were made.

  • ShareAlike: Adaptations must be distributed under the same license or a compatible license as permitted by Creative Commons.

  • No Additional Restrictions: Users may not impose legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from exercising the rights granted by the license.

The full license terms are available at:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

3. Authors' Rights

Authors retain the right to:

  • Share and distribute their published articles through personal websites, institutional repositories, and other scholarly platforms.

  • Reuse their published work in subsequent scholarly publications, teaching materials, books, or other academic activities, with appropriate acknowledgment of the original publication.

  • Deposit the published version of their articles in institutional or subject-based repositories, subject to the applicable license terms.

Authors should acknowledge HISTORIA as the venue of first publication and provide the article's DOI or official publication URL where available.

4. Third-Party Materials and Historical Sources

Authors are responsible for ensuring that any copyrighted materials included in their manuscripts, such as photographs, maps, illustrations, archival reproductions, and other third-party content, are used with appropriate permission or under a valid legal exception.

Materials not owned by the authors and not covered by the article's Creative Commons license must be clearly identified through appropriate credit lines or license notices.

The publication of historical documents or archival materials does not automatically transfer ownership or copyright in those materials to the authors or the journal.

5. Publication and Distribution Rights

HISTORIA may publish, disseminate, index, and preserve accepted articles through its official website and recognized academic databases and digital archiving services.

The journal does not require authors to transfer copyright ownership as a condition of publication.

6. Licensing Transparency

The applicable copyright and licensing information will be clearly communicated through the journal's website and article publication information.

HISTORIA encourages responsible scholarly reuse, accurate attribution, and respect for the intellectual contributions of authors and other rights holders.

 

 

 

Manuscript Types

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah primarily publishes original research articles in history education and historical studies.

The journal accepts the following manuscript types:

1. Original Historical Research Articles

Research based on primary and secondary historical sources, including archival documents, newspapers, manuscripts, oral histories, and other historical evidence. Manuscripts must demonstrate appropriate historical methods, critical source analysis, and a clear historiographical contribution.

2. History Education Research Articles

Empirical research on history teaching and learning in schools, higher education, and public educational settings. Studies may employ qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, classroom-based, or other appropriate research approaches.

3. Interdisciplinary Historical Research Articles

Research integrating historical perspectives with other disciplines, including social studies, cultural studies, heritage studies, the history of education, and the history of science and technology. Historical inquiry must constitute a central component of the study.

4. Systematic Review and Bibliometric Articles

Systematic literature reviews, scoping reviews, and bibliometric studies addressing history or history education. These manuscripts must employ transparent and reproducible procedures, clearly defined data sources, appropriate analytical methods, and critical interpretation of their findings.

General Requirements

All manuscripts must present a clearly defined research problem, engage critically with relevant scholarship, employ appropriate and transparent research methods, and demonstrate originality and a meaningful scholarly contribution.

Purely descriptive essays, opinion pieces, and manuscripts lacking sufficient research evidence or methodological rigor are not considered for publication.

 

Conflict of Interest Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to ensuring transparency, impartiality, and integrity throughout the editorial and peer-review processes.

A conflict of interest may arise when financial, institutional, professional, academic, or personal relationships could influence, or reasonably be perceived to influence, the conduct, evaluation, or publication of scholarly research.

1. Authors

Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that may affect the interpretation or presentation of their research. All manuscripts must include a conflict-of-interest statement, even when no conflicts exist.

2. Reviewers

Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment. Reviewers should decline assignments when personal relationships, professional collaborations, institutional affiliations, or competing interests could compromise their impartiality.

3. Editors

Editors must declare potential conflicts of interest and withdraw from editorial decisions involving manuscripts in which they have a personal, professional, financial, or institutional interest.

Manuscripts submitted by editors or editorial board members must be handled by an independent editor who has no relevant conflict of interest. Such manuscripts must undergo the same editorial screening and double-blind peer-review procedures as other submissions.

4. Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions must be based exclusively on scholarly merit, methodological quality, research integrity, and relevance to the journal's focus and scope. Publication fees, institutional affiliations, personal relationships, or other non-academic considerations must not influence editorial decisions.

5. Disclosure and Management

The editorial team may request additional information concerning potential conflicts of interest. When a conflict is identified, appropriate measures may include reassignment of editorial responsibilities, appointment of independent reviewers, or withdrawal from the review process.

Failure to disclose a significant conflict of interest may result in editorial investigation and appropriate corrective action.

HISTORIA follows internationally recognized principles of publication ethics and editorial independence, including relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

Allegations of Research Misconduct

Allegations of Research Misconduct

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to maintaining the integrity, transparency, and credibility of scholarly research and publication. The journal takes all allegations of research misconduct seriously and addresses them through fair, confidential, and evidence-based procedures.

1. Types of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct may include, but is not limited to:

  • Plagiarism: Presenting another person's ideas, words, findings, or research materials without appropriate acknowledgment.

  • Fabrication and Falsification: Inventing, altering, or misrepresenting research data, historical evidence, archival documents, interview records, or research findings.

  • Duplicate Publication: Publishing substantially the same research in multiple journals without appropriate disclosure or justification.

  • Authorship Misconduct: Guest authorship, gift authorship, ghost authorship, or unauthorized changes to authorship.

  • Citation Manipulation: Inappropriate or coercive citation practices intended to artificially increase citations.

  • Peer-Review Manipulation: Providing false reviewer identities, interfering with independent evaluations, or otherwise compromising the peer-review process.

  • Research Ethics Violations: Conducting research without required ethical safeguards, informed consent, or appropriate protection of participants and confidential information.

  • Misuse of Generative AI: Using artificial intelligence to fabricate data, historical sources, quotations, references, or research findings.

2. Reporting Allegations

Authors, reviewers, readers, and other concerned parties may report suspected misconduct to the HISTORIA editorial office through its official contact channels.

Reports should identify the relevant manuscript or published article, describe the alleged misconduct, and provide supporting evidence where available.

The journal will handle allegations confidentially to the extent reasonably possible and will not disclose the complainant's identity unnecessarily.

3. Investigation Procedures

The editorial team will:

  1. Conduct an initial assessment of the allegation and available evidence.

  2. Determine whether further investigation is warranted.

  3. Request clarification or supporting documentation from the individuals concerned.

  4. Consult independent experts, relevant institutions, or other appropriate parties when necessary.

  5. Evaluate the evidence objectively and provide the individuals concerned with a reasonable opportunity to respond.

  6. Determine appropriate editorial action based on the findings.

Editors with relevant conflicts of interest must not participate in the investigation or related decisions.

4. Editorial Actions

Depending on the nature and severity of the findings, HISTORIA may:

  • Request clarification, additional evidence, or manuscript revisions.

  • Reject a manuscript under consideration.

  • Suspend editorial processing while an investigation is ongoing.

  • Publish a correction or an expression of concern.

  • Retract a published article when its findings are unreliable or serious ethical violations are established.

  • Refer relevant concerns to the authors' institutions or other appropriate authorities.

Editorial actions will be proportionate to the available evidence and consistent with the journal's publication ethics policies.

5. Post-Publication Misconduct

Allegations received after publication will be assessed using the same principles of fairness, confidentiality, and evidence-based evaluation.

When corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions are necessary, the journal will publish clearly identified notices linked to the original article to preserve the integrity of the scholarly record.

6. Editorial Responsibility

HISTORIA follows relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in addressing suspected research misconduct.

The journal is responsible for evaluating concerns relating to the scholarly record and taking appropriate editorial action. Investigations requiring institutional authority may be referred to the relevant research institutions.

All parties involved are expected to cooperate with investigations and uphold the principles of academic integrity, transparency, and fairness.

 

Post-Publication Discussion Policy

Post-Publication Discussion Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah encourages constructive scholarly discussion and critical engagement with articles published in the journal. Post-publication discussion is an important part of academic communication, enabling researchers to evaluate, reconsider, and develop historical interpretations and research findings.

1. Forms of Post-Publication Discussion

HISTORIA welcomes scholarly responses to published articles, including:

  • Critical comments on historical interpretations, arguments, or research findings.

  • Methodological critiques and discussions of research approaches.

  • Clarifications concerning historical sources, archival evidence, or data interpretation.

  • Responses presenting additional historical evidence or alternative interpretations.

  • Scholarly replies from the authors of published articles.

All contributions must be evidence-based, academically relevant, and expressed in a respectful and professional manner.

2. Submission of Comments and Responses

Readers and researchers may submit post-publication comments, scholarly responses, or requests for clarification through the journal's official editorial contact channels.

Submissions should clearly identify the article concerned, including its title, authors, publication year, and DOI or URL where available.

Contributors should provide a clear explanation of their comments, supported by relevant scholarly references or historical evidence.

3. Editorial Assessment

The editorial team will assess submitted comments and responses for scholarly relevance, factual accuracy, clarity, and adherence to publication ethics.

Where appropriate, the editorial team may:

  1. Request clarification or revision from the contributor.

  2. Invite the original authors to provide a response.

  3. Seek independent expert assessment when substantive scholarly issues are raised.

  4. Facilitate the publication of an academically relevant comment and author response, subject to editorial approval.

Acceptance and publication of comments or responses are not automatic and remain subject to editorial evaluation.

4. Scholarly Debate and Academic Integrity

HISTORIA supports respectful academic disagreement and recognizes that historical interpretations may evolve through new evidence, methodological developments, and historiographical debate.

Personal attacks, defamatory statements, unsupported accusations, discriminatory language, and comments unrelated to the scholarly content of an article will not be accepted.

5. Corrections and Research Integrity Concerns

When post-publication discussions identify possible factual errors, significant methodological problems, or concerns about research integrity, the editorial team will assess whether further action is required.

Such matters will be handled in accordance with the journal's Correction and Retraction Policy and Allegations of Research Misconduct Policy.

6. Transparency and Editorial Responsibility

When scholarly comments and author responses are formally published, HISTORIA will clearly identify the article being discussed and maintain appropriate links between the original publication and subsequent contributions.

The editorial team is responsible for ensuring that post-publication discussions are conducted fairly, transparently, and in accordance with established principles of publication ethics.

 

Correction and Retraction Policy

Correction and Retraction Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to maintaining the accuracy, reliability, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes that errors or concerns about published research may arise after publication and will address them through appropriate editorial procedures.

HISTORIA follows relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in managing corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions.

1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when a published article contains an error that requires formal amendment but does not invalidate the overall findings or conclusions.

Such errors may include:

  • Incorrect historical dates, names, locations, or factual details.

  • Errors in archival references, source attribution, or bibliographic information.

  • Mistakes in tables, figures, data presentation, or transcription of historical documents.

  • Other substantive errors that do not undermine the reliability of the research as a whole.

When a correction is necessary, HISTORIA will publish a clearly identified correction notice explaining the nature of the error and the information being corrected.

The correction notice will be linked to the original article. Where the article itself is updated, the journal will clearly indicate that a correction has been made and preserve transparency regarding the publication record.

2. Expressions of Concern

HISTORIA may publish an expression of concern when serious questions arise about the reliability or integrity of a published article but the available evidence is insufficient to justify an immediate retraction.

An expression of concern may be considered when:

  • There is credible evidence of possible research misconduct requiring further investigation.

  • An institutional investigation is ongoing or inconclusive.

  • Significant concerns about research findings cannot yet be resolved.

The notice will describe the concerns as accurately as possible without presenting unverified allegations as established facts.

The editorial team will review the notice when additional evidence or investigation findings become available.

3. Retractions

A published article may be retracted when reliable evidence demonstrates that its findings or conclusions are substantially unreliable or that serious violations of publication ethics have occurred.

Grounds for retraction may include:

  • Fabrication or falsification of research data, historical sources, archival evidence, or research findings.

  • Substantial plagiarism or unauthorized reproduction of scholarly work.

  • Redundant publication involving significant overlap without appropriate disclosure.

  • Serious methodological or analytical errors that invalidate the principal findings.

  • Unethical research practices or manipulation of the publication and peer-review processes that substantially compromise the integrity of the article.

Retraction decisions will be based on the available evidence and the seriousness of the identified problems.

4. Retraction Procedures

When a potential reason for retraction is identified, the editorial team will:

  1. Conduct an initial assessment of the concern and supporting evidence.

  2. Contact the corresponding author and, where appropriate, other authors to request clarification.

  3. Consult independent experts, relevant institutions, or other appropriate parties when necessary.

  4. Provide the authors with a reasonable opportunity to respond.

  5. Evaluate the findings and determine the appropriate editorial action.

Editors with relevant conflicts of interest must withdraw from the decision-making process.

Retraction may proceed when justified by sufficient evidence, even if the authors do not agree with the decision.

5. Retraction Notices and Article Preservation

When an article is retracted, HISTORIA will publish a clearly identified retraction notice stating the reasons for the retraction and identifying the party responsible for the decision.

The notice will be freely accessible and linked to the original article.

The original article will ordinarily remain available in the journal's electronic archive and will be clearly marked as RETRACTED to preserve the transparency and integrity of the scholarly record.

Article metadata and the journal website will be updated where technically possible to reflect the retraction status.

6. Requests for Corrections or Retractions

Authors, reviewers, readers, and other concerned parties may report errors or concerns about published articles through the journal's official editorial contact channels.

Requests should identify the article concerned and provide a clear explanation and supporting evidence.

The editorial team will evaluate requests fairly, confidentially where appropriate, and without unnecessary delay.

7. Relationship to Other Publication Ethics Policies

Concerns involving suspected plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, or other forms of research misconduct will also be handled in accordance with HISTORIA's Allegations of Research Misconduct Policy.

Scholarly disagreements or alternative historical interpretations do not, by themselves, constitute grounds for correction or retraction unless they demonstrate substantive errors or unreliable findings.

HISTORIA is committed to ensuring that all post-publication editorial actions are transparent, proportionate, and consistent with recognized standards of publication ethics.

 

Electronic Archiving Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah recognizes the importance of long-term digital preservation to ensure the continued availability, accessibility, integrity, and authenticity of its published scholarly content.

1. Digital Preservation Commitment

HISTORIA is committed to maintaining the long-term accessibility of published articles, journal issues, bibliographic metadata, and associated publication records.

The journal supports digital preservation practices designed to reduce the risks of data loss, technological obsolescence, and interruptions to online access.

2. Journal Platform and Digital Records

HISTORIA publishes and maintains its scholarly content through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform hosted by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Published articles, journal issues, and their bibliographic information are made available through the journal's official website.

3. Distributed Digital Preservation

HISTORIA supports the use of recognized digital preservation mechanisms, including LOCKSS-based preservation systems and other appropriate archiving services, subject to technical compatibility and institutional arrangements.

Participation in an external preservation network and the successful deposit of journal content must be verified through the relevant preservation service.

4. Institutional Backup and Recovery

HISTORIA recognizes the importance of regular institutional backups and appropriate recovery procedures to protect journal files, metadata, and publication records.

Technical backup arrangements are coordinated with the institution responsible for hosting and maintaining the journal platform.

5. Metadata and Scholarly Record Integrity

The journal is committed to maintaining accurate bibliographic metadata and persistent links to published scholarly content wherever technically supported.

Corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions will be documented in accordance with the journal's Correction and Retraction Policy to preserve the transparency of the scholarly record.

6. Long-Term Access

HISTORIA seeks to ensure that its published scholarly content remains discoverable and accessible over time, including through appropriate institutional or external preservation arrangements.

The journal will review its digital archiving practices periodically and update this policy when preservation arrangements change.

 

Publication Schedule Policy

Publication Schedule Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is a peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal published twice a year, on April 30 and October 30.

1. Publication Frequency and Dates

HISTORIA publishes two regular issues annually according to the following schedule:

  • Issue 1: April 30

  • Issue 2: October 31

These dates constitute the journal's official publication schedule. HISTORIA is committed to maintaining consistency and punctuality in the publication of its regular issues.

2. Manuscript Submission

HISTORIA accepts manuscript submissions throughout the year through its online submission system.

All submitted manuscripts undergo editorial screening, double-blind peer review, and the necessary revision and production processes.

Submission or acceptance of a manuscript does not guarantee publication in a particular issue.

3. Editorial and Publication Process

Accepted manuscripts are assigned to scheduled issues based on the completion of peer review, editorial decisions, revisions, copyediting, and final production.

The editorial team coordinates the publication process to ensure that each issue is released on its scheduled publication date.

4. Publication Timeliness

HISTORIA is committed to publishing its regular issues on April 30 and October 30 each year.

In exceptional circumstances that may affect the publication schedule, the editorial team will communicate significant changes through the journal's official website.

5. Publication Announcements

Newly published issues and relevant editorial announcements are made available through the official HISTORIA website.

The journal periodically evaluates its editorial and publication procedures to maintain publication quality, transparency, and adherence to its established schedule.

 

Ownership and Management Policy

Ownership and Management Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is a peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal published by the History Education Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences Education (FPIPS), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung, Indonesia, in collaboration with the Association of History Educators and Researchers (APPS) and the Indonesian Historical Society (Masyarakat Sejarawan Indonesia, MSI).

Collaborating Organizations

HISTORIA collaborates with the Association of History Educators and Researchers (APPS) and the Indonesian Historical Society (MSI) to support scholarly networking, academic cooperation, the development of historical research and history education, and the dissemination of scholarly publications.

These collaborations contribute to the journal's academic development while maintaining the editorial team's independence in manuscript evaluation, peer review, and publication decisions.

 

Contact Information Policy

Contact Information Policy

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah is committed to maintaining accessible, transparent, and reliable communication with authors, reviewers, readers, researchers, and other stakeholders.

1. Editorial Office

HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah

History Education Study Program
Faculty of Social Sciences Education (FPIPS)
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
Gedung Numan Soemantri, 2nd Floor
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229
Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia

Official Journal Email: [email protected]

Journal Website: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/historia

2. Principal Contact

Dr. Wildan Insan Fauzi, M.Pd
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

3. Support Contact

Syahidah Sumayyah, M.Hum
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

4. Official Communication Channels

HISTORIA receives inquiries concerning manuscript submissions, editorial procedures, peer review, publication ethics, corrections, retractions, and other journal-related matters through its official contact channels.

Authors are encouraged to use the journal's online submission system for manuscript submission and editorial correspondence.

5. Complaints and Publication Ethics Concerns

Complaints concerning editorial decisions, conflicts of interest, suspected research misconduct, or published articles may be submitted to the editorial office through the official journal email.

All complaints will be assessed fairly and handled in accordance with the journal's applicable editorial and publication ethics policies.

6. Contact Information Updates

HISTORIA is committed to keeping its institutional address, editorial contacts, and official communication channels accurate and up to date.

Changes to contact information will be reflected on the journal's official website.