PEASANTS AND FEUDALISM: THE RELEVANCE OF HISTORICAL EVENTS WITH THE LIFE SKILLS CURRICULUM
Abstract
The theoretical framework used in this article was dialectics between the assumption that the change of the socio-economic life in the villages into commercialism was a prolong nightmare for the villagers and the assumption that the changed socio-economic life of the villages into commercialism brought new economic opportunities for the villagers. The conclusion was commercialism resulted in rationality and prosperity for the farmers. The peasants would spend their time and energy more efficiently to exploit the new opportunities given. The rational considerations were more determining than the social motivation in terms of decision making. The peasants had the life skills to create beneficial alternative economic resources to support their lives in the middle of a greater flow of foreign plantation commercialism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Algement Verslaag Purworejo (1882).
Algemen Verslag Purworejo 1899.
Antlov, H. (2001) Kepemimpinan Jawa: perintah halus, pemerintahan otoriter. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Arminus. (1889). “Het Budget van een Javaansche Landbouwer”, dalam Indische Gids, II ..
Balitbang Puskur Depdiknas. (2007). Konsep Pengembangan Model Integrasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Kecakapan Hidup, Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Dikdasmen.
Boeke, J.H. dan Burger, D.H. (1973).Ekonomi Dualistis: Dialog antara Boeke dan Burger. Jakarta: Bhratara.
Breman, J. (1986). Penguasaan Tanah dan Tenaga Kerja di Jawa Masa Kolonial. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Doorn, C.L. van. (1926). Schets van de Economische Ontwikkeling der Afedeeling Purworejo, Weltevreden: G. Koof & Co.,
Fernando. (1986). “Dynamics of Peasants Economy of Java at Local Level”, dalam D.P. Chandler dan M.C. Ricklefs, Nineteent and Twentieth Century Indonesia, Victoria: Center of Southeast Asian Studies Monas University,.
Geertz, C. (1983). Involusi Pertanian: Proses Perubahan Ekologi di Indonesia, Jakarta: Bhratara.
Gelderen, J. van. (1912.) “Bevolkingdictheid en Landbouw op Java”, Koloniale Studien, II .
Gelpke, S. (1904). ”Beantwording van Ewnige den Vraagpunten Betreffende het Landbouwcrediet”, dalam Koloniaal Tijdschrift,.
Gilbert, J. dan Garraghan, S.J. (1957). A Guide to Historical Method. East Fortham Road and New York: Fordham University Press.
Ginkel, H. Fieves de Malines van. (1926). Verslag van Economische Toestandder Inlandsche Bevolking 1924, I, Wltevreden: Landsdrukerij.
Kartodirdjo, S. (1977). Memorie Serah Jabatan Jabatan 1921-1930: Jawa Tengah, Jakarta: Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia,
Kartodirdjo, S. dan Suryo, D. (1991) Sejarah Perkebunan Di Indonesia: Kajian Sosial Ekonomi, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
Onderzoek naar de Mindere Welvaart der Inslandsche Bevolking op Java en Madoera, Batavia: Landsdrukkerij, 1905, IX.c.
Paulus, J. (1917), Encyclopedie van Nederlandsch Indie, ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff,
Popkin, S.L.. (1979)Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam, Berkeley: University of California.
Sajogyo dan. Collier, W.L. (1986). Budi Daya Padi di Jawa, Jakarta: Gramedia,
Scheltema, A.M.P.A. (1922) “Enige Gegevens Betreffende den Economischen Toestend in de Regentschappen, van waar in 1928 de meeeste Contractkoelies”, Koloniale Studien, II ,
Scott, J.C. (1989). Moral Ekonomi Petani: Pergolakan dan Subsistensi di Asia Tenggara, Jakarta: LP3ES,.
Suryomihardjo, A. (1979). Pembinaan Bangsa Dan Masalah Historiografi. Jakarta: Yayasan Idayu Press..
Terra, G.J.A., “De Voeding der Bevolking en de Erfcultuur”, dalam Koloniaal Studiens, II , 1932.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v11i1.12131
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah
INDEXED
TOOLS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Alamat Redaksi: Gedung Numan Soemantri, FPIPS UPI, Departemen Pendidikan Sejarah, Lantai 2, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154