Efektivitas Two Stay Two Stray terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Sejarah: Quasi-Experiment pada Siswa Kelas XI
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) cooperative learning model in improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes in Indonesian History. The research was conducted with Grade XI social science students at MA Al-Ma’sum Malausma using a quantitative quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. The sample consisted of 69 students, comprising 33 students in the experimental group (XI IPS 2) and 36 students in the control group (XI IPS 1). Data were collected through pretests and posttests using 19 multiple-choice items and analyzed using tests of normality, homogeneity, an independent samples t-test, and effect size analysis. The results revealed a statistically significant improvement in the cognitive learning outcomes of students taught using the TSTS model. The experimental group’s mean posttest score (81.79) increased substantially from the pretest mean (53.12). Hypothesis testing showed a significance value of p < .003 (t = −3.058, df = 67), indicating a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. The effect size, calculated using Cohen’s d, was 0.74, representing a medium effect. These findings suggest that the Two Stay Two Stray cooperative learning model has a positive and meaningful impact on students’ cognitive achievement in Indonesian History.
Keywords: Cognitive Learning Outcomes; History Education; Quasi-Experiment; Two Stay Two Stray.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Two Stay Two Stray terhadap hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik pada mata pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada peserta didik kelas XI IPS di MA Al-Ma’sum Malausma dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui desain kuasi eksperimen tipe nonequivalent control group. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 69 peserta didik, terdiri atas 33 peserta didik kelas XI IPS 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 36 peserta didik kelas XI IPS 1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes awal dan tes akhir berbentuk 19 soal pilihan ganda, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji independent samples t-test, serta perhitungan ukuran efek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model Two Stay Two Stray berpengaruh signifikan terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik. Rata-rata nilai posttest kelas eksperimen sebesar 81,79 meningkat secara signifikan dibandingkan rata-rata pretest sebesar 53,12. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan nilai signifikansi p < 0,003 dengan nilai t = −3,058 pada derajat kebebasan 67, sehingga hipotesis penelitian diterima. Ukuran efek yang dihitung menggunakan Cohen’s d menunjukkan nilai sebesar 0,74 yang termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray efektif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik pada mata pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia. .
Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar Kognitif; Kuasi-Eksperimen; Pembelajaran Sejarah Two Stay Two Stray.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhianur, S. (2024). Penerapan model problem-based learning berbantuan media question card terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas XI SMAN 1 Tasikmalaya (Skripsi sarjana, Universitas Siliwangi).
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Apriakanti, D., Kusuma, M., & Nurhayati, M. (2020). The effectiveness of two stay two stray (TSTS) cooperative learning model in improving students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 40-43.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2021). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
Bali, M. M. E. I. (2020). Penerapan model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray dalam meningkatkan keaktifan belajar pebelajar. Murobbi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 29-42.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Fathurrohman, M. (2015). Model-model pembelajaran. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Firman, F., Aswar, N., Sukmawaty, S., Mirnawati, M., & Sukirman, S. (2020). Application of the Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model in Improving Indonesian Language Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 551-558.
Harahap, K. A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of cooperative learning model with type of two stay two stray to improve results of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(2), 156–163.
Hasmyati, Suwardi, & Arafah, A. A. (2018). Effective learning models in physical education teaching. Deepublish.
Hatmono, P. D. (2021). Historiografi buku teks sejarah lokal pada pembelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, 2(1), 60–74.
Marihot, Y., Sari, S., & Endang, A. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA), 1(1).
Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210
Mesah, D. B., Wahyuni, S., & Liliek, T. (2020). Penerapan cooperative learning two stay two stray untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan keaktifan siswa SMA. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 123–132.
Oktaviani, U., Kumawati, S., Apriliyani, M. N., Nugroho, H., & Susanti, E. (2021). Identifikasi faktor penyebab rendahnya hasil belajar matematika peserta didik di SMK Negeri 1 Tonjong. Math Locus: Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 2–6.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press.
Sari, D. F., Fitriani, S. S., & Emafetery, S. (2019). The strategy of Two Stay Two Stray to improve EFL students’ reading skill. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 171-184.
Shavab, O. A. K. (2025). The effect of Smart Apps Creator on improving student history learning outcomes. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v8i1.87074
Shavab, O., Afriza, E., & Jayusman, I. (2025). The effect of Smart App Creator application on improving students’ critical thinking. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 12(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v12i2.88051.
Silalahi, M., & Sary, Y. W. (2020). The Using Of Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Strategy On Students’ Reading Comprehension. Bilingual: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 2(2), 70-77.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanto, A. (2016). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Prenadamedia Group.
Syah, M. (2013). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wahab, G., & Rosnawati. (2021). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Penerbit Adab.
Wahyuni, E. S. (2020). Model pembelajaran mastery learning. Deepublish.
Wandani, S. K., Muttaqin, M., Paujiah, E., Farhan, T. B., & Muzanni, H. S. (2024). Improve student learning outcomes in reproductive system materials using two stay two stray cooperative learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3058(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201782
Yandi, A., Nathania, A., Putri, K., & Syaza, Y. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi hasil belajar peserta didik: A literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara (JPSN), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38035/jpsn.v1i1
Zuardi, Z., Yunisrul, Y., Arwin, A., & Hanum, W. (2023). Cooperative learning model two stay two stray in elementary school. In Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference (MIC 2022) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2022.2327379.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v8i2.90439
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah
INDEXED
TOOLS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Alamat Redaksi: Gedung Numan Soemantri, FPIPS UPI, Departemen Pendidikan Sejarah, Lantai 2, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154