Exploring The Effectiveness of E-Learning: A Scoping Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Jibril Mohammed, Onasanya Onasanya, Samuel Adenubi


E-learning has emerged as a modern and widely adopted method of education that utilizes electronic systems for educational programs. Its popularity stems from its affordability, flexibility, and ability to transcend geographical boundaries. However, challenges exist in implementing e- learning through mobile technologies due to inadequate infrastructure and support. As the demand for accessible and adaptable learning methods increases, researchers and educators must optimize the online learning experience and address associated challenges. Qualitative and quantitative research methods have been employed to study e-learning, offering in-depth understanding and objective measurements. This article presents a scoping review of qualitative and quantitative research in the context of e- learning, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations. The findings illustrate the diverse range of topics explored through these methods, demonstrating their value in enhancing e-learning practices and interventions. By combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, researchers.


Extrinsic Motivation; Intrinsic Motivation; Motivation; Teaching; Teacher Effectiveness.

Full Text:



Baur, N. (2019). Linearity vs. Circularity? On Some Common Misconceptions on the Differences in the Research Process in Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Epistemological and Ethical Aspects of Research in the Social Sciences, 4(53), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2019.00053/full

Damuri, A., Isnain, N., Rahmatika, Priyatama, A., Chandra, Y., & Putra, A. S. (2021). E-Learning Proposal System in Public Secondary School Learning. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(2), 270-275. Retrieved from https://w ww.ijersc.org/index.php/go/article/view/72/44

Djafar, H., Yunus, R., Pomalato, S. W., & Rasid, R. (2021). Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigm ConstellationIn Educational Research Methodology. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(2), 339-345. Retrieved from https://ijersc.org/index.ph p/go/article/view/70/57

Intrac. (2020). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. intrac for Civil Society . Retrieved from https://www.intrac.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Quantitative-and- qualitative-methods.pdf

Kandel, B. (2020). Qualitative Versus Quantitative Research. Marsyangdi Journal, 1, 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/49300627/Qualitative_Versus_Quantitative_ Research

Mahyoob, M. (2021). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11, 351-362. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3652757_code4220231.pdf?abstra ctid=3652757&mirid=1

Monfared, J. H., & Derakhshan, H. (2015). The Comparison Qualitative And Quantitative Research. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5, 1111-1117. Retrieved from https://www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2015/02/143-JLS-S2-147-HOJATOLA H-COMPARISON%20-66.pdf

Nariman, D. (2020). Impact of the Interactive e-Learning Instructions on Effectiveness of a Programming Course. Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 1194, 588–597. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-50454-0_61#citeas

Rahman, M. S. (2017). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10026.1/16598/EJ1120221.pdf?sequen ce=1&isAllowed=y

Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Factors – Enablers and Barriers – Affecting E-learning in Health Sciences Education. BMC Medical Education, 20(91). Retrieved from https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12909-020-02007- 6.pdf

Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019). Tracking E-learning Through Published Papers: A Systematic Review. 136, 87-98. Retrieved from https://www.scie ncedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131519300715#preview-section-abstract

Rouleau, G., Gagnon, M.-P., Côté, J., Payne-Gagnon, J., Hudson, E., Dubois, C.-A., & Bouix- Picasso, J. (2019). Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews. 21(10). Retrieved from https://www.jmir.org/2019/10/e15118/

Samuel, N., Ogunlade, O. O., & Onasanya, S. A. (2018). Nigerian University Lecturers’ Socio- Demographics on the Perceived Obstacles. Global Media Journal, 16(31). Retrieved from https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/nigerian-university-lecturers- sociodem ographics-on-the-perceived-obstacles-to-the-use-of-mobile-technologies-for- research.ph p?aid=87120

Sinaga, A. (2014). Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis and How It Should be Applied in our Research. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1072 2206/Difference_Between_Qualitative_And_Quantitative_Analysis_And_How_It_Shoul d_Be_Applied_In_Our_Research

Surbhi, S. (2018). Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Retrieved from Keydifferences.com: https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-qualitative-and- qua ntitative-research.html

Vaona, A., Rigon, G., Banzi, R., Kwag, K. H., Cereda, D., Pecoraro, V., . . . Bonovas, S. (2015). E- learning for Health Professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(6). Retrieved from https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD011 736/full

Wyllie, T. M. (2019). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tshidi-Wyllie-Med-Counselling- 2/publication/3488 84143_qualitative_and_quantitative_research_approaches/links/60144aefa6fdcc071ba 11d87/qualitative-and-quantitative-research-approaches.pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v8i2.68016


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, is published by UPI Press in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

 Lisensi Creative Commons

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan of Indonesia University of Education disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Berdasarkan ciptaan pada https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/mimbardik/.

View My Stats