Adaptation of the Cambridge curriculum: A comparative study of public and Islamic schools
Abstract
This research aims to explore how the Cambridge curriculum can be adapted as a relevant educational strategy for addressing global challenges, particularly in developing countries such as Indonesia. In the inequality between national education policy and its implementation in the field, the Cambridge curriculum offers an approach that emphasizes critical thinking, collaboration, and global-mindedness. The method used in this study is a qualitative literature review, analyzing various academic sources and reports on the implementation of the Cambridge curriculum in different school contexts. The results of the study show that the adaptation of the Cambridge curriculum in Indonesia, both in public and Islamic-based schools, exhibits different dynamics. However, both have a positive impact. Public schools implement this curriculum directly with a primary focus on global academic standards, without the need to conform to religious values. Meanwhile, the Islamic school has successfully combined the Cambridge curriculum with Islamic values, creating an educational model that is not only academically global but also spiritually and morally strong. Both approaches show great potential in bridging local education with global standards in a contextual and relevant manner.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana adaptasi kurikulum Cambridge dapat menjadi strategi pendidikan yang relevan dalam menjawab tantangan global, khususnya bagi negara berkembang seperti Indonesia. Di tengah ketimpangan antara kebijakan pendidikan nasional dan pelaksanaannya di lapangan, kurikulum cambridge menawarkan pendekatan yang menekankan pada kemampuan berpikir kritis, kolaboratif, dan global-mindedness. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi literatur kualitatif, dengan menganalisis berbagai sumber akademik dan laporan implementasi kurikulum cambridge di berbagai konteks sekolah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adaptasi kurikulum cambridge di Indonesia, baik di sekolah umum maupun berbasis Islam, menunjukkan dinamika yang berbeda namun keduanya berdampak positif. Sekolah umum menerapkan kurikulum ini secara langsung dengan fokus utama pada standar akademik global, tanpa perlu menyesuaikan dengan nilai-nilai keagamaan. Sementara itu, sekolah Islam berhasil menggabungkan kurikulum cambridge dengan nilai-nilai keislaman, menciptakan model pendidikan yang tidak hanya global secara akademik, tetapi juga kuat secara spiritual dan moral. Kedua pendekatan ini menunjukkan potensi besar dalam menjembatani pendidikan lokal dengan standar global secara kontekstual dan relevan.
Kata Kunci: kurikulum Cambridge; sekolah Islam; sekolah negeri
Keywords
Full Text:
Download PDF (English)References
Abidin, D., Retnaningrum, E., Parinussa, J. D., Kuning, D. S., Manoppo, Y., & Kartika, I. M. (2023). Curriculum development in Indonesia from a historical perspective. Journal of Education Research, 4(2), 443-451.
Anindya, R., & Pamungkas, H. P. (2023). Analysis of Cambridge curriculum implementation in character education aspects in economic learning (case study at Singapore Intercultural School Semarang). International Journal of Emerging Research and Review, 1(2), 1-14.
Armstrong, M. (2011). Curriculum, pedagogy, and the Cambridge primary review: A response to RJ Campbell. Education 3-13, 39(4), 357-361.
Bunnell, T., Fertig, M., & James, C. (2017). Establishing the legitimacy of a school’s claim to be “International”: The provision of an international curriculum as the institutional primary task. Educational Review, 69(3), 303-317.
Corlu, M. S. (2021). Which preparatory curriculum for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme is best? The challenge for international schools with regard to Mathematics and Science. International Review of Education, 60(1), 793-801.
Cowen, R., & Kim, T. (2023). Comparative education and intercultural education: Relations and revisions. Comparative Education, 59(3), 379-397.
Crossley, M. (1984). Strategies for curriculum change and the question of international transfer. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 75-88.
Fangestu, I. W. F., & Marpuah, S. (2025). Perubahan dan inovasi kurikulum pendidikan di berbagai negara. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 6(1), 1-20.
Golding, D., & Kopsick, K. (2023). The colonial legacy in Cambridge assessment literature syllabi. Curriculum Perspectives, 39(1), 7-17.
Harapan, E. (2023). Revolusioner kurikulum dan tantangannya di abad ke-21. Limeemas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(2), 65-74.
Hastuti, D. M. (2024). The challenge of implementing Cambridge curriculum in elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 12(3), 318-326.
Hayden, M., & Thompson, J. (1995). International schools and international education: A relationship reviewed. Oxford Review of Education, 21(3), 327-345.
Hayden, M., McIntosh, S., Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Thompson, J. (2020). Global citizenship: Changing student perceptions through an international curriculum. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(5), 589-602.
Holandyah, M., Erlina, D., Marzulina, L., & Yulianti, D. (2022). The implementation of the Cambridge lower secondary English curriculum: Teachers’ voices at one private school in Palembang. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 9(1), 69-83.
Ibrahim, T. (2005). Global citizenship education: Mainstreaming the curriculum?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 177-194.
Lamy, S. L. (2007). Challenging hegemonic paradigms and practices: Critical thinking and active learning strategies for international relations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(1), 112-116.
Lestari, I. B., Wahyudin, D., & Dewi, L. (2023). Analysis of managerial procedures for developing the Cambridge curriculum in junior high schools. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 11(1), 39-48.
Lim, L. (2011). Beyond logic and argument analysis: Critical thinking, everyday problems and democratic deliberation in Cambridge international examinations’ thinking skills curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(6), 783-807.
Lim, L. (2012). Ideology, class and rationality: A critique of Cambridge international examinations’ thinking skills curriculum. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(4), 481-495.
Maudina, A. N. (2020). Implementasi integrasi kurikulum 2013 dan kurikulum Cambridge di SMP Al-Syukro Ciputat. Qiro'ah: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 1-18.
Melosik, Z. (2023). Comparative education: The status controversy and dynamics of scientific development. Studia z Teorii Wychowania, 14(3), 9-26.
Mustadi, A., & Junaidi, A. D. (2024). The implementation of Cambridge curriculum in the international elementary school. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 122-131.
Olensia, Y., & Kurnia Sari, R. (2017). Potret Cambridge advanced (chemistry as and a level) di Sekolah Mutiara Harapan Riau tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 12-21.
Siahaan, G. N. B. (2024). Comparison of climate education policies: Lessons for Indonesia from Australia, the US, and the UK. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 3(3), 2572-2579.
Simanjuntak, M. B. (2020). The effects of integration between kurikulum 2013 and Cambridge curriculum in English (Study case taken from Saint Peter's Junior High School). Journal of Advanced English Studies, 3(1), 50-59.
Simanjuntak, M. B., Suseno, M., Setiadi, S., Lustyantie, N., & Barus, I. R. G. R. G. (2022). Integration of curricula (curriculum 2013 and Cambridge curriculum for junior high school level in three subjects) in pandemic situation. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 8(1), 77-86.
Sinnema, C., Nieveen, N., & Priestley, M. (2020). Successful futures, successful curriculum: What can Wales learn from international curriculum reforms?. The Curriculum Journal, 31(2), 181-201.
Suri, S., Sholeh, M., & Roesminingsih, E. (2024). Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum Cambridge dengan Model CIPP. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 55-68.
Suryani, D., & Widodo, W. (2019). Digital learning based Cambridge curriculum on science learning at SMP Islam Al-Azhar 13 Surabaya. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 138-146.
Sutarsa, A. N. (2024). Bilingualisme dan perkembangan kognitif pada anak 17 tahun studi kasus pada siswa kelas Cambridge MAN 4 Jakarta. Bestari: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta Pengajarannya, 2(1), 14-22.
Syafi'i, M. V. (2019). Implementation of integrated Cambridge and 2013 Curriculum of English at Tazkia International Islam Boarding School Malang. Language-Edu, 8(2), 1-8.
Termaat, A. (2024). How disciplinary detail obscures the metacognitive potential of curriculums. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(3), 319-335.
Tröhler, D. (2023). Comparative education or epistemological power games for world domination. Comparative Education, 59(3), 458-474.
Wardani, S., & Kusuma, I. W. (2020). Comparison of learning in inductive and deductive approach to increase student’s conceptual understanding based on international standard curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 70-78.
Wijayanti, C. (2022). The evaluation of Cambridge curriculum towards jump star books level 1-2 for the young learners in Flame Lingua Cilegon. Proceeding Aiselt (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching), 7(1), 302-312.
Wylie, M. (2008). Internationalizing curriculum: Framing theory and practice in international schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(1), 5-19.
Yamin, M. A., & Astutik, A. P. (2023). Islamic religion education learning model based on the Cambridge curriculum in improving the quality education. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 49-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i2.84860
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Labibah Sayaka Ilma, Hanun Asrohah, Husniyatus Salamah Zainiyati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development
Published by Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with
Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154
Indexed By:
Curriula: Journal of Curriculum Development on Google Scholar