Global midwifery education models and their impact on competence
Abstract
High-quality midwifery education is crucial for preparing competent practitioners to face the complex challenges encountered in maternal and newborn health. This scoping review aims to explore diverse global models of midwifery education, including simulation-based learning, leadership development, and competency-based curricula. Using PRISMA-ScR guidelines and JBI methodology, seven peer-reviewed studies from various countries were analyzed to identify key themes, challenges, and innovations. The findings reveal that while many educational models successfully enhance clinical, interpersonal, and decision-making competencies, significant gaps remain—especially in educator preparedness, infrastructure availability, and the integration of non-technical skills, such as emotional intelligence and communication. Additionally, curriculum alignment with both global standards and local health system needs remains inconsistent. This review emphasizes the importance of contextually relevant, adaptable, and comprehensive education frameworks. Strengthening midwifery education through faculty development, investment in learning infrastructure, and curriculum reform can significantly contribute to improving maternal and newborn outcomes worldwide.
Abstrak
Pendidikan kebidanan yang berkualitas tinggi sangat penting untuk mempersiapkan praktisi yang kompeten dalam menghadapi tantangan kompleks yang dirasakan pada kesehatan ibu dan bayi baru lahir. Tinjauan cakupan ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi berbagai model pendidikan kebidanan di tingkat global, termasuk pembelajaran berbasis simulasi, pengembangan kepemimpinan, dan kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Dengan menggunakan pedoman PRISMA-ScR dan metodologi JBI, tujuh studi dari berbagai negara dianalisis untuk mengidentifikasi tema utama, tantangan, dan inovasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun banyak model pendidikan berhasil meningkatkan kompetensi klinis, interpersonal, dan pengambilan keputusan, akan tetapi masih terdapat kesenjangan penting terutama dalam kesiapan pendidik, ketersediaan infrastruktur, serta integrasi keterampilan non-teknis seperti kecerdasan emosional dan komunikasi. Selain itu, penyelarasan kurikulum dengan standar global dan kebutuhan sistem kesehatan lokal belum konsisten. Tinjauan ini menekankan pentingnya kerangka pendidikan yang relevan secara kontekstual, adaptif, dan holistik. Penguatan pendidikan kebidanan melalui pengembangan dosen, investasi infrastruktur, dan reformasi kurikulum dapat berkontribusi signifikan terhadap peningkatan kesehatan ibu dan bayi secara global.
Kata Kunci: kebidanan; kompetensi; model pendidikan
Keywords
Full Text:
Download PDF (English)References
Adnani, Q. E. S., Chairiyah, R., Argaheni, N. B., Khuzaiyah, S., Widyasih, H., & Telfer, M. (2025). Decoding newly graduated midwives: A value-based philosophy of vocational and professional midwifery program in Indonesia. Midwifery, 141(1), 1-10.
Bogren, M., Jha, P., Sharma, B., & Erlandsson, K. (2025). Evaluating a midwifery leadership programme: A process evaluation study. Women and Birth, 38(1), 1-6.
Bogren, M., Kaboru, B. B., & Berg, M. (2021). Barriers to delivering quality midwifery education programmes in the Democratic Republic of Congo—An interview study with educators and clinical preceptors. Women and Birth, 34(1), 67-75.
Çalım, S. İ., Ulaş, S. C., Demirci, H., & Tayhan, E. (2020). Effect of simulation training on students′ childbirth skills and satisfaction in Turkey. Nurse education in practice, 46(1), 1-10.
Cassano, F., Tamburrano, A., Mellucci, C., Galletti, C., Damiani, G., & Laurenti, P. (2020). Evaluation of emotional intelligence among master’s degree students in nursing and midwifery: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 1-11.
Changuiti, O., Moustarhfir, N., Marfak, A., Saad, E., Hilali, A., & Youlyouz-Marfak, I. (2021). Simulation based-learning from simple to complicated clinical situations for midwifery students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 1(1), 881-886.
Davison, C., Geraghty, S., & Morris, S. (2018). Midwifery students’ understanding and knowledge of normal birth before ‘delivery’of curriculum. Midwifery, 58(1), 77-82.
Diaz, M. M. P., Brown, A. E., Fleet, J. A., & Steen, M. (2023). Effectiveness of female genital mutilation/cutting education for health professionals: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 69(1), 1-13.
Folkvord, S. E., Borlaug, T., & Risa, C. F. (2025). Midwifery students’ experiences after participation in the SimBegin® facilitator course. Nurse Education in Practice, 1(1), 1-10.
Gebreheat, G., Whitehorn, L. J., & Paterson, R. E. (2022). Effectiveness of digital simulation on student nurses’ knowledge and confidence: An integrative literature review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13(1), 765-775.
Goshomi, U. (2023). Intercultural communication and midwifery care. African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 17(1), 1-1.
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), 1-12.
Ho, K. H. M., Cheng, H. Y., McKenna, L., & Cheung, D. S. K. (2024). Nursing and midwifery in a changing world: Addressing planetary health and digital literacy through a global curriculum. Nursing Open, 11(1), 1-3.
Irangani, L., Prasanna, I. R., Gunarathne, S. P., Shanthapriya, S. H., Wickramasinghe, N. D., Agampodi, S. B., & Agampodi, T. C. (2022). Social determinants of health pave the path to maternal deaths in rural Sri Lanka: Reflections from social autopsies. Reproductive Health, 19(1), 221-237.
Kemp, J., Maclean, G. D., Moyo, N., Kemp, J., Maclean, G. D., & Moyo, N. (2021). Innovations for strengthening global midwifery. Global Midwifery: Principles, Policy and Practice, 1(1), 127-145.
Kranz, A., Schulz, A. A., Wirtz, M. A., Plappert, C., Abele, H., & Graf, J. (2023). Assessment of the relevance of midwifery competencies in academic education in Germany from the midwives’ perspective: A structural analysis of cross-sectional survey data. European Journal of Midwifery, 7(22), 1-13.
Kubota, S., Ando, M., Khambounheuang, S., Theppanya, K., Nanthavong, P., Tengbriacheu, C., Sisavanh, M., Khattiyod, T., Asai, D., & Murray, J. (2024). A gap analysis of midwifery competency, pre-and in-service education for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and, adolescent health in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific, 43(1), 1-11.
Laschinger, S., Medves, J., Pulling, C., McGraw, D. R., Waytuck, B., Harrison, M. B., & Gambeta, K. (2008). Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students’ knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction. International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare, 6(3), 278-302.
Levett-Jones, T., Cant, R., & Lapkin, S. (2019). A systematic review of the effectiveness of empathy education for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 75(1), 80-94.
Lindsay, M. J., Avery, M. D., Larson, K., Woll, A., VonAchen, A., & Mortenson, A. (2015). Emergency birth hybrid simulation with standardized patients in midwifery education: Implementation and Evaluation. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 60(3), 298-303.
Mala, O., Kain, V. J., & Forster, E. M. (2024). Evaluating an educational program for enhancing neonatal intensive and special care nurses’ and midwives’ competence with neonatal pain management: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 30(4), 380-387.
Maree, C., Yazbek, M., & Leech, R. (2018). Process of development of a contemporary curriculum in advanced midwifery. Health SA Gesondheid, 23(1), 1-6.
Nugraha, D., Melbiarta, R. R., Visuddho, V., Rimbun, R., Sakina, S., Herawati, L., Ummah, F. C., Rejeki, P. S., & Romdhoni, A. C. (2023). Hybrid learning as alternative approach to improve Indonesian medical students’ attitude towards clinical skills during COVID-19 pandemic. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 35(4), 377-388.
Puspita, R. (2022). Hambatan dan tantangan pendidikan kebidanan di era pandemi COVID-19. Excellent Midwifery Journal, 5(1), 104-111.
Renfrew, M. J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M. H., Campbell, J., Channon, A. A., Cheung, N. F., ... & Declercq, E. (2014). Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed maternity care framework. The Lancet, 384(9948), 1129-1145.
Ruhdiat, R., Wardani, D. S., Sihite, H., Montolalu, I. A., & Tyarini, I. A. (2024). Improving maternal and infant outcomes through enhanced midwifery practices. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(6), 843-849.
Shayan, A., Bibalan, F. G., Shafaei, M., Rahnavardi, M., & Masoumi, S. Z. (2019). Challenges of clinical education in midwifery and strategies to improve it: A qualitative study. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 8(1), 1-10.
Smith, R. M., Calvert, B., Kata, E., Hataogo, S., Ioane, T. R., Tarabo, M., Kiritome, M., Abraham, J., Lees, T., & Devi, C. (2023). Midwifery education in Pacific Island countries: A discussion paper. Women and Birth, 36(6), 605-612.
Sriram, S., Almutairi, F. M., & Albadrani, M. (2024). Midwife-led versus obstetrician-led perinatal care for low-risk pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22), 1-32.
Tama, K. A., & Susanti, A. I. Effects of online teaching strategies on midwifery students’ skills: A scoping review. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(1), 539-552.
Wallace, H. J., & Harvey, T. M. (2024). ‘Listen with an open-heart always’–A qualitative study exploring transformational learning opportunities for Australian midwifery students participating in a virtual international study experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 81(1), 1-9.
Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Transformative change through the sustainable development goals?. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90-95.
Wisesa, M., & Susanti, A. I. (2025). The future of midwifery education: Student-centered learning and digital technology. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(1), 581-594.
Zondag, D. C., van Haaren-Ten Haken, T. M., Offerhaus, P. M., Maas, V. Y. F., & Nieuwenhuijze, M. J. (2022). Knowledge and skills used for clinical decision-making on childbirth interventions: A qualitative study among midwives in the Netherlands. European Journal of Midwifery, 6(56), 1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i2.87984
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Zulaiha Baila, Ari Indra Susanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development
Published by Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with
Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154
Indexed By:
Curriula: Journal of Curriculum Development on Google Scholar