Accelerating gifted Filipino children: Considerations and challenges

Tyrone O. Gil Jr.

Abstract


This study underscores the importance of nurturing intellectually advanced Filipino youth as a catalyst for national development and innovation. It addresses the underutilization of gifted education in the Philippines, shaped by cultural, socio-economic, and systemic challenges. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of academic acceleration strategies and examine how gifted students and their families perceive them. Using a systematic literature review, policy analysis, and theoretical frameworks, the study investigates methods such as subject-based acceleration, grade skipping, early entrance, curriculum compacting, telescoping, and radical acceleration. Findings indicate that these approaches foster not only academic achievement but also socio-emotional benefits, including greater satisfaction, stronger self-concept, and reduced disengagement. The research challenges misconceptions that acceleration harms students, showing instead that obstacles stem from weak policies, insufficient teacher training, and inconsistent practices. The paper concludes that a paradigm shift is necessary through culturally sensitive identification, stronger policies, and sustained support to maximize the potential of gifted learners. 

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya pengembangan anak-anak berbakat intelektual di Filipina sebagai penggerak pembangunan nasional dan inovasi. Isu utama yang diangkat adalah masih kurangnya pemanfaatan pendidikan bagi anak berbakat akibat kendala budaya, sosial-ekonomi, dan sistemik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi efektivitas strategi percepatan akademik serta memahami persepsi murid berbakat dan keluarganya terhadap pendekatan tersebut. Melalui tinjauan pustaka sistematis, analisis kebijakan, dan penerapan kerangka teoretis, penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai metode, seperti percepatan berbasis mata pelajaran, loncat kelas, masuk sekolah lebih awal, pemadatan kurikulum, telescoping, dan percepatan radikal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi ini tidak hanya meningkatkan capaian akademik, tetapi juga memberikan manfaat sosial-emosional, seperti kepuasan belajar, penguatan konsep diri, dan berkurangnya kejenuhan. Penelitian ini menantang anggapan bahwa percepatan merugikan murid, dengan menegaskan bahwa hambatan justru muncul dari lemahnya kebijakan, kurangnya pelatihan guru, dan praktik yang tidak konsisten. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan perubahan paradigma melalui identifikasi yang peka budaya, kebijakan yang lebih kuat, serta dukungan berkelanjutan untuk mengoptimalkan potensi murid berbakat.

Kata Kunci: akselerasi; anak berbakat Filipina; pendidikan anak berbakat; strategi akselerasi


Keywords


acceleration; acceleration strategies; gifted education; gifted Filipino

References


Al-Duraywish, A. A. (2023). Nurturing brilliance: A cross-cultural exploration of supporting gifted children. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(11), 124-131.

Bernstein, B. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2020). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830-847.

Chagas-Ferreira, J. F., Fleith, D. de S., & Prado, R. M. (2022). Development of talent according to Sinti and Calon Romani. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1-9.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Marron, M. A., Castellano, J. A., Clinkenbeard, P. R., Rogers, K. B., Calvert, E., Malek, R., & Smith, D. (2010). Guidelines for developing an academic acceleration policy. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(2), 180-206.

Courtinat-Camps, A., & de Léonardis, M. (2009). Contextes de scolarisation et estime de soi chez des élèves à haut potentiel. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 30(1), 1-24.

Cross, J. R. (2013). Gifted education as a vehicle for enhancing social equality. Roeper Review, 35(2), 115-123.

Dai, D. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Behind an accelerated scientific research career: Dynamic interplay of endogenous and exogenous forces in talent development. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1-16.

Faustino, J. B., & Hiwatig, A. D. F. (2012). Special science elementary school: Project and prospects for gifted education in the Philippines. Journal of Science Education in Japan, 36(2), 131-142.

Gallagher, S., & Smith, S. R. (2013). Acceleration for talent development: Parents' and teachers' attitudes towards supporting the social and emotional needs of gifted children. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 97-112.

Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2011). Socioaffective issues and concerns among gifted Filipino children. Roeper Review, 33(4), 239-251.

Gatcho, A. R. G., Manuel, J. P. G., & Hajan, B. H. (2024). No child left behind, literacy challenges ahead: A focus on the Philippines. Frontiers in Education, 9(10), 1-5.

Gross, M. U. M., & van Vliet, H. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entry to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 154-171.

Guignard, J., Bacro, F., & Guimard, P. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect?. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 59-74.

Guilbault, K. M., & Meyer, M. S. (2024). Toward equity and transparency: A content analysis of Florida elementary acceleration policies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(4), 316-339.

Heinbokel, A. (2002). Acceleration: Still an option for the gifted. Gifted Education International, 16(2), 170-181.

Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J. G., & Verhoeven, L. (2011). Social-emotional characteristics of gifted accelerated and non-accelerated students in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 585-605.

Ignacio, A. G. (2024). Exploring the perspectives of preservice Filipino Mathematics teachers: Basis for a proposed educational belief model. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(4), 487-500.

Ivarsson, L. (2024). Acceleration and enrichment for gifted students: From the perspective of Swedish principals. Athens Journal of Education, 11(2), 95-112.

Kanevsky, L., & Clelland, D. (2013). Accelerating gifted students in Canada: Policies and possibilities. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 229-271.

Lagacé-Leblanc, J., Courtinat-Camps, A., Capdevielle, V., Massé, L., Baudry, C., Verret, C., Couture, C., Nadeau, M.-F., & Bégin, J.-Y. (2021). Perceptions de la douance chez les élèves doués dans un centre de services scolaires québécois. Psychologie Française, 68(2), 261-272.

Larroder, A. C., & Ogawa, M. (2015). The development of a self-evaluation checklist for measuring Filipino students’ science giftedness. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1(1), 1-20.

Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Peternel, G. (2010). The efficacy of academic acceleration for gifted minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 189-208.

Magtoto, F. O. M. (2017). Nature of nurture: Mentally superior young adults in the Philippines. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 6(1), 45-57.

Matthews, D. J., & Dai, D. Y. (2014). Gifted education: Changing conceptions, emphases and practice. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 335-353.

McClarty, K. L. (2014). Life in the fast lane. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(1), 3-13.

Naval-Severino, T. (1992). Identification of intellectually able disadvantaged Filipino children. Gifted Education International, 8(2), 72-80.

Noor, B. (2023). Pressure and perfectionism: A phenomenological study on parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of the challenges faced by gifted and talented students in self-contained classes. Frontiers in Education, 8(1), 1-9.

Opoku, M. P., Moustafa, A., Alsheikh, N., Anwahi, N., Aljaberi, M., Alkhateri, T., Almeqbaali, A., & Elhoweris, H. (2024). The nexus between the attitudes and self-concepts of gifted students in an Arab context. PLoS ONE, 19(6), 1-17.

Papadopoulos, D. (2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know?. Children, 8(11), 1-15.

Pawilen, G. T. (2018). Home environment of selected Filipino gifted individuals. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(2), 65-77.

Pawilen, G. T. (2018). Development and implementation of a science-based integrated curriculum for nurturing the gifted potentials of young Filipino children. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 12(3), 45-66.

Pawilen, G. T., & Manuel, S. J. (2018). A proposed model and framework for developing a curriculum for the gifted in the Philippines. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 118-134.

Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280-282.

Raoof, K., Shokri, O., Fathabadi, J., & Panaghi, L. (2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), 1-22.

Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. M. (2020). Research on the schoolwide enrichment model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, 37(2), 109-128.

Reis, S. M., Renzulli, S., & Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Enrichment and gifted education pedagogy to develop talents, gifts, and creative productivity. Education Sciences, 11(10), 1-9.

Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 117-139.

Saldaña, G. N., Flores-Oyarzo, G., & Navarro, M. G. G. (2022). Inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de la provincia de Concepción, Chile: Un estudio comparativo con un instrumento piloto. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(47), 96-116.

Schuur, J., van Weerdenburg, M., Hoogeveen, L., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). Social-emotional characteristics and adjustment of accelerated university students: A systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 29-48.

Siegle, D., Wilson, H. E., & Little, C. A. (2013). A sample of gifted and talented educators’ attitudes about academic acceleration. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 27-51.

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54.

Sweeney, A., & Reid O’Connor, B. (2024). Teacher attitudes towards streaming in Mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(5), 1-29.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (1992). Educational decision making on acceleration and grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 68-72.

Vuyk, M. A., Montania, M., & Barrios, L. (2024). Boredom and its perceived impact in adolescents with exceptional mathematical talent: A sequential mixed-methods study in Paraguay. Frontiers in Sociology, 9(1), 1-17.

Wu, E. (2013). Enrichment and acceleration: Best practice for the gifted and talented. Gifted Education International, 27(2), 209-218.

Yuen, M., Chan, S., Chan, C., Fung, D. C., Cheung, W. M., Kwan, T., & Leung, F. K. (2016). Differentiation in key learning areas for gifted students in regular classes. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 36-49.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i2.90035

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Tyrone O. Gil Jr.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development
Published by Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with
Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154


Indexed By:

Grapefruit slice atop a pile of other slices DOAJ ROAD GARUDA Crossref DIMENSIONS

Google Scholar

Curriula: Journal of Curriculum Development on Google Scholar