Pengaruh Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis STEM terhadap Literasi Teknologi dan Keterampilan Pengambilan Keputusan Siswa SMA

Siti Halimatusya’diyyah Luthfiyani, Ari Widodo, Diana Rochintaniawati

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the effect of STEM-based biology learning on technological literacy and students’ decision making skills in senior high school. The sample used in this study were X grade students from two classes in one of the senior high school in Bandung. Determination of the research subject was carried out as a convenience sampling technique from recommendation teachers and studying the activities of students who had not learned about environmental pollution material. This study used a quasi-experimental method through a non-equivalent control group design. Student’s technological literacy in this study was measured by using several aspects of technological literacy while student’s decision making was measured by using open-ended questions that are relevant to socio-scientific issues. Student’s decision making analyzed based on the basic categories of decision making and the level of argumentation as a reasoning process in decision making. This study shows that STEM-based biology learning does not affect technological literacy and decision making in high school students. This was done on statistical tests on technological literacy and decision making skills tests results that showed no significant difference between students in STEM classes with non-STEM classes.


Keywords


technological literacy; decision making skills; socio-saintific issue; STEM-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriana, J., Anna, P., & Any, F. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2) 202-212.

Asunda, P.A. (2011). Open courseware and stem initiatives in career and technical education programs. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(2).

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hwang, J., & Taylor, J.C. (2016). Stemming on STEM: a stem education framework for students with disabilities. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19(1), 39-49.

ITEA. (2000). Standards for technology Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Virginia: ITEA.

Kapila, V. & Iskander, M. (2014). Lessons learned from conducting a K-12 project to revitalize achievement by using instrumentation in Science Education. Journal of STEM Education, 15 (1), pp. 46-51

Kelley, T.R., & Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 (11).

Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1).

Krupczak, J., & Disney, K.A. (2013). Technological literacy: assessment and measurement of learning gains. Makalah disajikan dalam at the 120th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.

Mawson, B. (2004). Factors affecting children’s learning in technology. Makalah disajikan dalam Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Annual Conference, Melbourne.

Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Exploration of student’s creativity by integrating stem knowledge into creative products. Makalah disajikan dalam Proceeding of International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education (MSCEIS 2015), Bandung, 17 Oktober 2015.

NAE, & NRC. (2002). Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NAE & NRC. (2006). Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, D.C: National Academic Press.

NRC. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education Practices. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press.

Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7).

Rustaman, N.Y. (2016). Pembelajaran sains masa depan berbasis STEM education. Makalah disajikan dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi Edukasi 2016. Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Padang, 30 April 2016.

Sadler, T.D., & Zeidler, D.L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1).

Stansell, A., Tyler-Wood, T., & Stansell, C. (2016). Inventing the invented for stem understanding. Makalah disajikan dalam The 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2016).

Suprapto, N. (2016). Students’ attitudes towards stem education: voices from indonesian junior high schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13 (Special Issue).

Widodo, A., Saptarani, D., Riandi, & Rochintaniawati, D. (2017). Development of students’ informal reasoning across school level. journal of education and learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3).

Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v2i2.19251

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View AIJBE Stats

Creative Commons License AIJBE is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License