Japanese Homophone Frequency Analysis: Acoustic Study

Tanty Aidullia Nasution, Peni Bernita Bangun, Siti Muharami Malayu

Abstract


Japanese homophones—words that share the same phonetic form but differ in meaning—are a prominent feature of the language, largely due to its limited phonemic inventory and rich prosodic system. Distinctions between such homophones are often conveyed through pitch accent and syllable duration, which serve as crucial phonological cues in spoken discourse. This study investigated two homophonic word pairs: ame (“rain” vs. “candy”) and hashi (“bridge” vs. “chopsticks”). Recordings were collected from native Japanese speakers, who were asked to produce the target words in a range of natural sentence contexts. Acoustic analyses were conducted using Praat software to examine pitch contours and syllable durations associated with each meaning. Results revealed consistent prosodic patterns that differentiate meanings within each homophone pair. In the case of ame, the pronunciation of “rain” featured a longer vowel duration on the first syllable [a] and a generally higher pitch contour, while “candy” exhibited greater length on the second syllable [me]. Similarly, for hashi, “chopsticks” was characterized by a longer [ha] syllable and elevated pitch at both the beginning and end of the word, whereas “bridge” showed a longer [shi] and a higher overall maximum pitch. These findings suggest that prosodic elements—particularly pitch accent and vowel duration—play an essential role in disambiguating homophones in Japanese. The results further highlight the distinct phonological structure of the Japanese language, where subtle variations in prosody contribute significantly to lexical differentiation in spoken communication.

Keywords


Acoustic Phonetics; Homonyms; Japanese; Praat analysis; Prosodic.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen, X. S., Chen, S., & Li, B. (2019). The influence of speech prosodic structure and syllable composition on consonant VOT in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(4_Supplement), 3009–3009. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137418

Davidson, K., & Lee, Y. (2023). Acoustic analysis of speech sounds in phonetics. Journal of Phonetic Research, 28(3), 45-62.

De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.385

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

Fry, D. B. (1955). The physics of speech. Acoustical Society of America Journal, 28(6), 1132-1146.

Fry, D. B. (1958). The acoustic aspects of the phoneme. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30(9), 1342-1347.

Furukawa, K., & Nakamura, S. (2024). Boundary-driven downstep induced by syntax–prosody mapping. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 156(2), 1440–1460. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0028340

Gordon, M. (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International journal of American linguistics, 70(1), 1-32.

Goss, S. J., & Tamaoka, K. (2019). Lexical accent perception in highly proficient L2 Japanese learners: The roles of language-specific experience and domain-general resources. Second Language Research, 35(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318775143

Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language And Meaning. London: Continuum.

Hayes-Harb, R., & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 54(3), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000658.

Idemaru, K., Wei, P., & Gubbins, L. (2019). Acoustic Sources of Accent in Second Language Japanese Speech. Language and Speech, 62(2), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918773118

Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2013). Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua, 124, 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.016

Karsono, H. (2013). Analisis Akustik Fonetik Menggunakan Praat [Phonetic Acoustic Analysis Using Praat]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Keating, P. A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.2307/413642

Lidwina, F. (2012). Kajian fonetik auditori dalam pengajaran Bahasa [The study of auditory phonetics in language teaching]. Linguistik Journal, 12(1), 45-58.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mennen, I., Scobbie, J. M., De Leeuw, E., Schaeffler, S., & Schaeffler, F. (2010). Measuring language-specific phonetic settings. Second Language Research, 26(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337617

Miller, G., & Brown, J. (2018). Speech Acoustics and Language. New Jersey: Wiley.

Mücke, D., Hermes, A., & Tilsen, S. (2020). Incongruencies between phonological theory and phonetic measurement. Phonology, 37(1), 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675720000068

Ningsih, H. (2007). Fonetik dan fonologi dalam kajian linguistic [Phonetics and phonology in linguistic studies]. Jurnal Linguistik, 10(2), 42-50.

Odden, D. (2005). Introducing Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peterson, R., & Henderson, J. (2020). Phonetic features and their role in speech perception. Speech and Hearing Studies, 14(2), 101-115.

Roettger, T. B. (2019). Researchers' degrees of freedom in phonetic research. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.147

Takahashi, T., Onohara, A., & Ihara, Y. (2023). Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of pitch-accent systems based on accentual class merger: A new method applied to Japanese dialects. Journal of Language Evolution, 8(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzae004

Tjandra, S. N. (2004). Fenomena erologi Jepang-Indonesia pada mahasiswa bahasa Jepang tahap menengah di Universitas Indonesia [The phenomenon of Japanese-Indonesian erology in Intermediate Japanese language students at the University of Indonesia]. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 8(1), 33-38.

Vigário, M., Frota, S., & João, M. (2011). Phonetics and Phonology: Interactions and Interrelations. Phonetica, 68(1–2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329393

Widodo, H., & Purnama, E. (2020). Sociolinguistics in Language and Culture. London: SAGE Publications.

Wati, F., & Hidayat, I. (2022). Perubahan sosial dan bahasa: Implikasinya terhadap komunikasi [Social and language change: Implications for communication]. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 21(4), 59-70.

White, P., & Taylor, K. (2021). Auditory Phonetics and Sound Perception. London: Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/japanedu.v10i1.83281

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 JAPANEDU: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by:
Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Literature Education  
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Online ISSN:
2528-5548
 

 

JAPANEDU: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang (e-ISSN:2528-5548) lisenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0)