The Connection Between Students Mental Capacity and Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the connection between students’ mental capacity and learning outcome in secondary schools. Learning outcome is the result of education in which student, teacher or institution were able to derived their educational aims and objectives. The participant for this study will comprises of 190 teachers in secondary schools in education district 1. The research design for this study was correlational research design type. Data Were Collected Using The "Students Mental Capacities, And Learning Outcome Questionnaire" (SMCLOQ). The mean score of students with mental capacity was higher, so teacher needs to concentrate on students whose learning outcome is low and use different teaching materials and methods, the teachers should teach according to the capacities of students which will assist the students to be successful. Learning outcomes and student’s mental capacity are significantly related, so schools needs to support the students to develop their mental capacities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ault, R.L. (1977). Children’s cognitive development, Piaget’s theory approach, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans.
Bernardo, A. B., Zhang, L. F., Callueng, C. M., (2002) Thinking styles and academic achievement among students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163 (2) 149-163.
Carroll, J. B., (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
Crow, L.D. & Crow, (1969). Adolescent development and adjustment. United States: McGrow-Hill Company.
Chong,Y.L & Jiar-Yeo, K. (2016). Cognitive Ability and Academic Achievement of Undergraduates. Man in India, 96 (6), 1903-1912.
Chauhan, S. S. (2007). Advanced Educational Psychology. Vikas Publishing House pvt.Ltd.
Elliott, C. D., Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C, A., Dorvil, C., Moldovan, J. (2010). Differential ability scales-II prediction of reading performance: Global Scores Are Not Enough
Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7 (4), 237–241.
Francisco C. G. & Elaine H. H, (2010). Learning and Thinking Styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20 (4), 413-430.
Mangal, S.K. (2016). Advanced Educational Psychology. Published by Phi Learning Private, Delhi.
Kytala, M., & Lehto, J. E. (2008). Some factors underlying mathematical performance: The role of visuo spatial working memory and non-verbal intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 77–94.
Osokoya, I. (2010). Teacher Education in Nigeria: Past, Present and Future Challenges. The online journal 8(4),
Peng. P. (2002). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development perspective. 14 (1), 15-20.
Proctor, B. (2012). Relationships between Cattell – Horn - Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and math achievement within a sample of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning disabilities, 45 (3), 278-87.
Phillipson, s. (2012). Children’s cognitive ability and their academic achievement: Asia Pacific Education
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jds.v2i1.78323
Refbacks
Journal of Didactic Studies https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jds is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
All rights reserverd. p-ISSN 2987-856X e-ISSN 2987-7512
Copyright © Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
Primary Teacher Education and Early Childhood Education study program
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Cibiru Campus
Secretariat:
Main Building of Journal Publication Center, 2nd Floor
Jl. Raya Cibiru KM 15 Bandung-West Java, 40393

SEARCH BY SUBJECT
FEES