Digital Activism and Collective Identity: “No Viral No Action” as Connective Action among Youth on Jakarta’s Air Pollution Issue

Yazied Taqiyuddin Ahmad, Lugina Setyawati

Abstract


This study examines the role of digital activism in forming collective identity among youth through the “No Viral No Action” campaign, which addresses air pollution in Jakarta. Using a qualitative approach with netnography methods, data was collected via in-depth interviews and social media content analysis on X (Twitter) and Instagram. The study explores how Jakarta’s youth use digital platforms to organize social movements and raise environmental awareness. The findings reveal that digital activism fosters collective identity through inclusive and interactive participation. The “No Viral No Action” campaign successfully garnered widespread support with engaging communication strategies tailored to the younger generation. Participation in this campaign not only strengthened solidarity but also heightened awareness of the importance of collective action against air pollution. The campaign’s effectiveness is attributed to self-organizing networks and actions facilitated by various entities, including ordinary citizens, communities, and media. The study concludes that the connective action seen in this campaign highlights the significant potential of social media in driving social change. It also underscores the crucial role of digital technology in enabling active youth participation in environmental issues, impacting the dynamics of contemporary social movements.

Keywords


Connective Action; Jakarta Air Pollution; Participatory Culture; Social Movements

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addiputra, A. F., Rahman, F. A., Madelin, M., Mumpuni, P. R., & Saepudin, E. (2020). Online Petition as a Form of Citizen Participation in the Digital Age. JPIS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial), 29(2), 181–192.

Alhabash, S., Almutairi, N., Lou, C., & Kim, W. (2019). Pathways to Virality: Psychophysiological Responses Preceding Likes,Shares, Comments, and Status Updates on Facebook. Media Psychology, 22(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1416296

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media And The Personalization Of Contentious Politics. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The Unedited Public Sphere. New Media and Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980

Candrasari, Y. (2020). Mediated Interpersonal Communication: A New Way of Social Interaction in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019), 423, 537–548. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200325.041

Calibeo, D. L., & Hindmarsh, R. (2022). From fake news to echo-chambers: On the limitations of new media for environmental activism in Australia, and “Activist-Responsive Adaptation”. Environmental Communication, 16(4), 490-504.

Castillo, E., La Londe, P. G., Owens, S., Scott, J., DeBray, E., & Lubienski, C. (2021). E-advocacy in the information market: How social media platforms distribute evidence on charter schools. Urban Education, 56(4), 581-609.

Center for Indonesia’s Strategic Development Initiatives. (2021). Air Pollution CISDI Report. Jakarta: Center for Indonesia’s Strategic Development Initiatives.

Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy. In Science Technology and Human Values (Vol. 45, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885

Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social Media Literacy: A Conceptual Framework. New Media and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530

Chunly, S. (2020). Social Media and Counterpublic Spheres in an Authoritarian State: Exploring Online Political Discussions Among Cambodian Facebook Users. Discourse, Context and Media, 34, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100382

De Angelis, G. (2021). Habermas, Democracy and The Public Sphere: Theory and Practice. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211038753

de Vries, G. (2020). Public Communication as a Tool to Implement Environmental Policies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 244–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12061

Douglas, H. (2022). Sampling Techniques for Qualitative Research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of Social Research Methodology. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science Advances, 8(10), eabl8198

Effendi, R., Haryanegara, M. E. A., Sukmayadi, V., & Aziz, F. (2020). Consumption of Online Political News and Political Participation of First-Time Voters. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 29(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v29i1.19751

Emina, K. A. (2021). Public Sphere and Civil Society: Habermasian Perspective. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal, 2(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.25273/she.v2i3.10539

Feng, C., Umaier, K., Kato, T., & Li, Q. (2021). Social Media: New Trends in Emergency Information. Journal of Disaster Research, 16(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2021.p0048

Fisher, W. R. (2017). Narration, Reason, and Community. In R. Brown (Ed.), Writing the Social Text Poetics and Politics in Social Science Discourse. New York: Routledge.

Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2022). Persuasion: Social Influence and Compliance Gaining. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003081388

George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From Clicktivism to Hacktivism: Understanding Digital Activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.001

Gui, E. M., & MacGill, I. (2018). Typology of Future Clean Energy Communities: An Exploratory Structure, Opportunities, and Challenges. Energy Research and Social Science, 35, 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.019

Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Data Activism and Social Change. Palgrave Pivot Cham.

Harmoko, D. D., & Purwaningrum, P. W. (2022). Dimensi Sosiokultural Terhadap Tagar di Twitter Indonesia. Ilmiah Tealaah, 7(2), 192–201.

Herman, D., Phelan, J. M., Rabinowitz, P. J., Richardson, B. K., & Warhol, R. R. (2012). Narrative Theory Core Concepts and Critical Debates. Athens: The Ohio State University Press.

Jenkins, H. (2018). Fandom, Negotiation, and Participatory Culture. In P. Booth (Ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237211.ch1

Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks. Political Psychology, 39(3), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478

Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data: The Role of Twitter Messages in Social Science Research (A. Jungherr (ed.)). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662

Khazraee, E., & Novak, A. N. (2018). Digitally Mediated Protest: Social Media Affordances for Collective Identity Construction. Social Media and Society, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118765740

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. SAGE Publications.

Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media. Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Bahri, S., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Social Media Empowerment in Social Movements: Power Activation and Power Accrual in Digital Activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512944

Lim, M. (2013). Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386

Lin, Y., & Kant, S. (2021). Using Social Media for Citizen Participation: Contexts, Empowerment, and Inclusion. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126635

Malodia, S., Filieri, R., Otterbring, T., & Dhir, A. (2024). Unlocking Social Media Success: How Prosumers Drive Brand Engagement through Authentic Conversations with Consumers. British Journal of Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12823

Masullo, G. M., Wilner, T., & Stroud, N. J. (2022). What Social Media Could Be: Normative Frameworks for Evaluating Digital Public Spaces. Social Media and Society, 8(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221130447

Mubarak, A. S., & Rhaif, K. K. (2021). Investigating pragma-rhetorical strategies utilized by American commencement speakers to motivate graduates for managing future opportunities and challenges. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 342-362.

Nikolinakou, A., & King, K. W. (2018). Viral Video Ads: Emotional Triggers and Social Media Virality. Psychology and Marketing, 35(10), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21129

Okafor, J. C., Nweke, C. C., Igweike, O. J., & Eze, O. I. (2024). A Critical Review of the Role of Social Media in Citizen Engagement and Policymaking: The Nigeria Discourse. Nigerian Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(1), 17-28.

Olson, M. (2009). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Pearce, S. C., & Rodgers, J. (2020). Social media as public journalism? Protest reporting in the digital era. Sociology Compass, 14(12), 1-14.

Roos, M., & Reccius, M. (2024). Narratives in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(2), 303-341.

Sugihartati, R. (2020). Youth Fans of Global Popular Culture: Between Prosumer and Free Digital Labourer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517736522

Suk, J., Abhishek, A., Zhang, Y., Ahn, S. Y., Correa, T., Garlough, C., & Shah, D. V. (2021). #MeToo, Networked Acknowledgment, and Connective Action: How “Empowerment Through Empathy” Launched a Social Movement. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864882

Sukarno, W., Hernandi, A., & Abdulhari, R. (2017). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pelebaran Jalan Nasional Di Kabupaten Bangka Tengah Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. JPIS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial), 26(1), 86–100.

Verma, E. (2023). An Invaluable Compendium of Netnography as a Qualitative Social Media Research Tool Keywords. International Journal of Research in Business Studies, 8(1), 39–58.

Wolfsfeld, G. (2022). Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003176657

Zahra, I. M. (2020). Religious Social Media Activism: A Qualitative Review of Pro-Islam Hashtags. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences [JASS], 11(1), 15-29.

Zhang, L., Zhao, J., & Xu, K. (2016). Who creates Trends in Online Social Media: The Crowd or Opinion Leaders? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12145




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v33i1.69582

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.