PROFIL KETERAMPILAN BERKOMUNIKASI SISWA SMA MENGGUNAKAN METODE FENETIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KLASIFIKASI ARTHROPODA

Feni Oktaviani, Topik Hidayat

Abstract


We conducted a research about communication skill of secondary biology student in Arthropode classification using phenetic method. Data were obtained from written report and oral presentation. There were five indicators used to analyze communication skill in oral presentation, which included their ability to express opinion themselves and hearing the opinion from other, their ability to master the concept to be presented, their ability to communicate of results systematically and clearly, their ability to question, and their ability to answer. Five indicators used in written report were their ability to choose informative character to build fenogram, their ability to undergo step by step, resulted phenogram, their ability to interpret the results, and their ability to make a report. Results showed that communication skill in oral were good enough (63.75%), but low (56.25%) in written. Based on interview, however, students felt comfortable when teacher used the phenetic method to understand classification of Arthropode. This method has markedly stimulated the students to study actively in the classroom.

Keywords


arthropode; communication skill; classification; phenetic method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anten, N. (2008). Analisis Keterampilan Komunikasi Siswa SMA Kelas XI pada Materi Konsep PH dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Melalui Metode Praktikum. Skripsi Sarjana pada Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Citrobroto, R.I. Suharti. (1979). PrinsipPrinsip dan Teknik-Teknik Berkomunikasi. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara.

Dahar, R.W. (2006). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Depdikbud. (2004). Indikator keberhasilan Pendidikan Berorientasi Kecakapan Hidup (Life Skills). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Harlen, W. (1989). Developing Science In The Primary Classroom. London: Oliver Boyd.

Latief, S. (2008). Komunikasi Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar [online]. Tersedia: http://202.152.33.84/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12548&itemid=46. [25 Mei 2009].

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. (2008). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rustaman, N.Y. Dirdjosoemarto, S. Yudianto, S.A. Achmad, Y. Subekti, R. Rochintaniawati, D. Nurjhani, M.K. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.

Semiawan, C. (1994). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses: Bagaimana Mengaktifkan Siswa dalam Belajar?. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Sukmadinata, N.S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Sulistiowati, Dwi. (2007). Kajian Komunikasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think_Pair_Square Menggunakan Modul Berprograma Dalam Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan. Skripsi Sarjana pada Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Topik, H. (2008). Testing Evolutionary Hypotheses in the Classroom Using Phenetic Method. Makalah yang disampaikan pada International Seminar on Science Education, UPI Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v15i1.35984

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v15i1.35984.g15364

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats