LEARNING MODEL FOR IMPROVING MASTERY OF FOOD CONCEPT AND THEMATIC INSTRUCTIONAL FOR PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Parsaoran Siahaan, Liliasari Liliasari

Abstract


This research, is part of a research on the development of a learning to improve mastery concept of science and the instructional. The learning model in this research integrate two courses with different subject and different semester in two PGSD of several campuses of an university of teacher training. PGSD-X, which is in the same city with the University and PGSD Y in other city at the same province. Subject of the research consisted of 25 prospective teacher students in PGSD X and 26 prospective teacher students in PGSD-Y. Scenario of learning was done in 4 phases, namely: (1) modeling phase, (2) discussions phase, (3) enrichment phase, and (4) peer teaching phase. The learning topics is the integration of food’s topic and thematic. The data was collected before learning (pre test) and after learning (post test). Data analysis was done by calculating the normalized gain from Hake . The results from PGSD-X obtained =0,72±0,07 in the mastery of food and = 0,70±0,14 in thematic. The results from PGSD-Y obtained =0,66±0,10 in the mastery of food and =0,53±0,20 in thematic. The results could be concluded that the ability of prospective teachers in the PGSD X better than PGSD –Y in mastery of food concept and thematic instructional.

Keywords


learning model; prospective teachers; food; thematic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson,L.W. dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning,Teaching,and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Abridged Edition. New York: Adisson Wesley Longman,Inc.

Baedhowi, (2008), Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan melalui peningkatan profesionalisme guru, Khazanah Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, Vol. I, No. 1 (September 2008)

Baird,W.E., Prather,P., Finson,K.D., Oliver,S. (1994). ”Comparison of perceptions among rural versus nonrural secondary science teachers: A Multistate Survey”. Science Education Journa. 78(6), 555-576.

Bhaskar Raj Upadhyay, (2005), Using students' lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking. Science EducationJournal, Vol 85(3), 492- 516

Dick ., Carey, L. (1978). The Systematic Design of Instruction (second edition).USA: Scott, Foreman and Company.

Driver, R. (1988). The Pupil as Scientist? Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Dunkin, M..J. (1987). The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford: Pargamon Press Heading Hill Hall.

Forgaty,R. (1991). How To Integrate The Curricula, Illinois: IRI/Skylight Publishing,Inc.

Fraenkel ,J.R., Norman E.W.(1993). How To Design and Evaluate Research in Education (second edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Fullan,M.(2001), The new meaning of educational change, Leading and Learning for the 21stC, Vol 1 No. 3 -January 2002.

Gassert-Ramey,L., Shroyer,M.G.,Staver,J.R.,(1996), “A Qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy ofelementary level teachers”. Science Education Journal. 80(3), 283-315.

Gega, P.C. (1994). Science in Elementary Education (seventh edition). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

George E. Hein and Sabra Price (1994), Active Assessment for Active Science: A Guide for Elementary School Teachers. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann,

Glencoe, (2001), Mathematics Applications and Connections, Course 1, 2 & 3. Columbus McGraw-Hill

Iskandar,S.M.,Hidayat,E.M.(1998). Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam,Dirjen Dikti, PGSD.

Jackson ,P.W. (1992). Handbook Of Research On Curriculum : A Project of the American Educational Research, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Johnson,Elaine B,Phd., (2002), Contextual Teaching and Learning, London, Sage Publications Ltd.

Joyce,B.R.,Weil,M. dan Calhoun,E. (2000), Models of Teaching, Boston:Allyn & Bacon

Liliasari (2001). “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Strategi Kognitif Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Menerapkan Berpikir Konseptual Tingkat Tinggi”. Laporan Penelitian, Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.

Loughran, J. (1994). “Bridging the gap: An analysis of the needs of second-Year Science Teachers”. Science Teacher Education. 78(4) , 365-386.

McDermott ,C,L. (1990) . “A Perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences, The Need for special science courses for Teacher”. American Journal Physics.

National Science Education Standards.(1996) Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

Richard E. Mayer, (2003), Learning and Instruction. New Jersey Pearson Educaton, Inc., Upper Saddle River.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v15i1.35986

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v15i1.35986.g15366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats