EKSPLORASI DIMENSI KREATIVITAS UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN PRODUK KREATIF ENERGI BARU DAN TERBARUKAN

Tantri Mayasari, Asep Kadarohman, Dadi Rusdiana

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Persediaan energi yang berasal dari fosil dunia termasuk Indonesia semakin berkurang, maka perlu dikembangkan produk kreatif energi baru dan terbarukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi kreatifitas dalam pengembangan produk kreatif energi baru dan terbarukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda deskriptif tanpa perlakuan terhadap responden. Total responden yang terlibat sebayak 30 peserta didik program studi pendidikan fisika pada salah satu LPTK di Madiun, Indonesia. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas kuesioner, wawancara, dan desain produk kreatif. Data yang diperoleh diolah dengan analisis regresi dan korelasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan antara produk kreatif yang dihasilkan dengan dimensi person, process, dan press, dengan nilai korelasi dari urutan tertinggi person (r = 0.787), press (r = 0.613), dan process (r = 0.543). Indikator dari dimensi person yang mempunyai pengaruh paling besar adalah rasa ingin tahu, keterbukaan terhadap pengalaman, dan rasa percaya diri yang tinggi. Indikator dari dimesi process yang perlu ditingkatkan adalah originalitas dan elaborasi.

ABSTRACT

Fossil energy availability in the world, including Indonesia, is increasingly declining; hence, a creative product of new and renewable energy needs to be developed. The research aimed to explore creativity in developing a creative product of new and renewable energy using descriptive method without any treatment to respondents. There were a total of 30 students of Physics Education Program in one of Teachers Training Institutions in Madiun, Indonesia, as the respondents. The instruments used in this research consisted of questionnaires, interviews, and creative product designs. The obtained data were analysed using regression and correlation. Results showed that there was a correlation between the creative products and the dimensions of person, process, and press, with the value of correlation from the highest to the lowest: person (r = 0.787), press (r = 0.613), and process (r = 0.543), respectively. The indicators for creative person that were observed to have greater influence were curiosity, openness to experiences, and high confidence. The indicators for creative process that needed to be improved were originality and elaboration.


Keywords


Kreativitas; Person; Press; Process; Product; Creativity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND. (1989). “The Creative Environment Work Scales: Work Environment Inventory”. Creativity Research Journal, 2: 231–54

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer Velag.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Upate to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 76-98). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cropley, A. J. and Cropley D. H. (2009). Fostering Creativity: A Diagnostic Approach for Higher Education and Organisations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Cropley, A. J. and Cropley D. H. (2007). Creativity a Handbook for Teachers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Cheng, V. M. Y. (2010). “Teaching creative thinking in regular science lessons: Potentials and obstacles of three different approaches in an Asian context”. Asia-Pascific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 11, (1), 3

ESDM. (2013). Produksi, Konsumsi, Ekspor, Impor Minyak Bumi per Tahun. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.esdm.go.id/minyak-bumi/produksi-konsumsi-ekspor-impor.html [14 Juni 2013].

Guilford, J.P. (1977). Way Beyond the IQ. Buffalo. Creative Learning Press.

Hamzah, B. U. (2007). Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B. & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). “Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.

Hong, Eunsook, et al. (2013). “Domain-General and Domain-Specific Creative-Thinking Test: Effect of Gender and Item Content on Test Performance”. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 47, (2), 89-105

Isaken, S.G., Dorval, K. B. & Treffinger, D. J., (2011). Creative Approaches to Problem Solving: A Framework for Innovation and Change. USA: Sage Publication.

Kattou, Maria. et al. (2013). “Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability”. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education. 45, (2), 167-181.

Kaufman, J. C. et al. (2008). Essenstials of Creativity Assessment. New Jersey: John Wiley & Son, Inc.

Klavir, Rama. & Gorodetsky, Malka. (2011). “Features of Creativity as Expressed in the Cosntruction of New Analogical Problems by Intellectually Gifted Students”. 2, (3), 164-173.

Kumara, Nyoman S. (2010). “Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya Skala Rumah Tangga Urban dan Ketersediaannya di Indonesia”. Jurnal Teknik Elektro. 9, (1), 68-75

Maintjes, H. & Grosser, M. (2010). “Creative thinking in prospective teachers: the status quo and the impact of contextual factors”. South African Journal of Education. 30, 361-386

Muna, M Rifqi. (2011). “Tinjauan Atas Kebijakan Nasional untuk Keamanan Energi”. Makalah pada Konggres Ilmu Pengetahuan Nasional (KIPNAS) ke X, Jakarta.

Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). “Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research”. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-311.

Rhodes M. (1961/1987). An analysis of creativity. In Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics, ed. SG Isaksen, pp. 216–22. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.

Runco, Mark A. (2004). Creativity. California: Psychol.

Shi, J. (2004). “Intelegence current in creative activities”. High Ability Studies, 15, 173-187.

Sidiq, Zulkifli. (2012). Konsep dan Pengukuran Kreatifitas. [Online]. Tersedia: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._PEND._LUAR_BIASA/196010151987101-ZULKIFLI_SIDIQ/KONSEP_DAN_PENGUKURAN_KREATIVITAS.pdf [10 Juni 2013].

Sternberg, R. J & Williams, W. M. (1996) How to Develop Student Creativity. Virginia: ASCD.

Tadmor, Carmit T. et al. (2012). “Beyond Individual Creativity The Superadditive Benefits of Multicultural Experience for Collective Creativity in Culturally Diverse Teams”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 43, (3), 384-392.

William, F.E. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet.. New York.: East Aurora.

Witt LA, Beorkrem M. (1989). “Climate for creative productivity as a predictor of research

usefulness and organizational effectiveness in an R&D organization”. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 30–40.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.36139

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.36139.g15519

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats