PENERAPAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN DEMONSTRASI INTERAKTIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA SMA PADA KONSEP SUHU DAN KALOR

Fanny Nurul Annisa, Saeful Karim, Ahmad Aminudin

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Berdasarkan hasil observasi yang menunjukan bahwa 60% siswa mendapat nilai di bawah nilai KKM yang sudah ditentukan. Metode pembelajaran Demonstrasi Interaktif dapat menjadi salah satu alternatif metode pembelajaran yang diterapkan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan respon siswa. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah One Group Pretest Postest Design, yang diterapkan pada 40 siswa. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa hasil belajar siswa mengalami peningkatan pada setiap seri pembelajaran setelah diterapkannya metode pembelajaran Demonstrasi Interaktif. Pada seri I IPK pretest 38,86% (rendah) dan IPK postest 55,45% (sedang), pada seri II IPK pretest 36,59% (rendah) dan IPK postest 55,67% (sedang), pada seri III IPK pretest 29,06% (rendah) dan IPK postest 55,94% (sedang). Untuk profil aktifitas siswa rata-rata aktivitas motorik memiliki persentase 59,07% (cukup), aktivitas visual memiliki persentase 61,46% (baik), aktivitas lisan memiliki persentase 64,24% (baik). Respon siswa untuk pernyataan positif, jumlah responden menjawab ya sebesar 84,4% dan tidak sebesar 15,6%, untuk persentase rata-rata pernyataan negatif, jumlah responden menjawab ya sebesar 42,5% dan tidak sebesar 57,5%.

ABSTRACT

Based on observations which showed that 60% of students scored below a predetermined value of KKM. Interactive Demonstration method that can be an alternative learning methods were applied to improve learning outcomes and student response. The study design used was one group pretest posttest design, which is applied to 40 students. The result showed that the learning outcomes of students has increased in each series learning after the implementation of an Interactive Demonstration methods. In the first series of pretest GPA 38.86% (low) and 55.45% GPA posttest (medium) , the second series of pretest GPA 36.59% (low) and posttest GPA 55.67% (moderate), the GPA Series III pretest 29.06% (low) and posttest GPA 55.94% (moderate). For the activity profile of the average student has a percentage of motor activity 59.07% (enough), visual activity has a 61.46% percentage (good), the percentage of oral activity has 64.24% (excellent). Students' positive response to the statement, the number of respondents answered yes by 84.4% and 15.6%, for the average percentage of negative statements, the number of respondents answered YES by 42.5% and NO by 57.5% .


Keywords


aktifitas belajar; hasil belajar; metode demonstrasi interaktif; respon; interactive demonstration method; learning activities; learning results; response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi revisi). Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2007). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum 2006 SMA (KTSP) Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Silabus dan Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Depdiknas. (2006). Pengembangan Model pendidikan kecakapan hidup. Tersedia : www.puskur.net [23 agustus 2009]

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. (1932). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.

Gross, J. L. (2002). Seeing is Believing : Classroom Demonstration as Scientific Inquiry. Illionis State University, Physics Department. Tersedia : http://www.phy.illstu.edu

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Methods In Introductory Mechanics Courses. Online.Tersedia : http://www.physics.indiana. edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf. [27 Juli 2009]

Marx, J. (2008). The Effect of Initial Conditions and Discussion on Students Predictions for Interactive Lecture Demonstration. Physics education research conference.

McDermott, L.C. (1996). Physics by Inquiry (Volumes I). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Merrits, D. dkk. (1997). Teaching with Interactive Demonstration. National Science Digital Library. Tersedia : http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/demonstrations/index.html

Munaf, S. (2001). Evaluasi Pendidikan Fisika (individual textbook). Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA UPI.

Panggabean, L. (1996). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA UPI.

Panggabean, L. 2001. Statistika Dasar. FPMIPA UPI Bandung

Sudjana. (2005). Metoda Statistik (edisi ke-6). Bandung: Tarsito.

Sudjana. (2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tanahoung, C. dkk. (2009). The Effect of Interactive Lecture Demonstrations on Students Understanding of Heat and Temperature : a Study from Thailand. XXVII. (I). Research in Science & Technology Education. Tersedia : http://www.informaworld.com

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2005). Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (Laporan Buku, Makalah, Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi). Bandung: UPI.

Wenning, J. Carl. (2005). Levels of Inquiry: Hierarchies of Pedagogical Practicesnand inquiry Processes. [Online]. Tersedia : www.dlsu.edu.ph/offices/asist/documents/Levels_of_Inquiry.pdf. (23 Maret 2010)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.36160

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.36160.g15534

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats