Wiwi Siswaningsih, Nur Anisa, Nur Eka Komalasari, Indah R



Penelitian ini dikembangkan untuk menghasilkan instrumen diagnostik two tier yang dapat mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi stoikiometri, hidrokarbon, dan laju reaksi. Metode deskriptif digunakan untuk mengembangkan instrumen pada materi stoikiometri dan laju reaksi sedangkan metode R&D digunakan untuk mengembangkan instrumen pada materi hidrokarbon. Kualitas instrumen diagnostik two-tier diuji dengan validitas dan reliabilitas. Uji validitas instrumen menunjukkan bahwa jumlah butir soal yang dinilai valid, yaitu 15 butir soal pada materi stoikiometri, 18 dari 39 butir soal pada materi hidrokarbon, dan 21 dari 56 butir soal pada materi laju reaksi. Instrumen tersebut kemudian diujikan kepada siswa SMA kelas X dan XI. Hasil tes tersebut dianalisis dan diinterpretasikan, sehingga miskonsepsi dapat teridentifikasi. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa miskonsepsi siswa pada materi stoikiometri meliputi hukum-hukum dasar kimia dan konsep mol. Miskonsepsi siswa pada materi hidrokarbon meliputi kekhasan atom karbon, ikatan atom dalam rantai karbon, dan rantai tertutup. Sementara itu, miskonsepsi siswa pada materi laju reaksi meliputi pengertian laju reaksi dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi laju reaksi.


This study is conducted to produce two-tier diagnostic instruments which are able to detect misconceptions in stoichiometry, hydrocarbon and reaction rate topics. Descriptive method was used in developing two-tier instruments for stoichiometry and reaction rate topics, while for hydrocarbon topic the method that used was Research and Development (R&D) method. The two-tier instruments are developed through essay test, interview to students and multiple choices problems. Validity test of these instruments shows that the numbers of questions that are judged as valid are 15 questions for stoichiometry topic, 18 questions for hydrocarbon topic and 21 questions for reaction rate topic. These instruments were tested to 10th and 11th grade of senior high school students. The results of the tests are analyzed and interpreted so the misconceptions can be identified. The findings of this research show that identified students’ misconceptions of stoichiometry through two-tier instrument are including basic law of chemistry and mol concept. The misconceptions of hydrocarbon topic are including characteristics of carbon, bonding in carbon chain and closed carbon chain structure. Meanwhile, the misconceptions of reaction rate topic are including definition of reaction rate, reaction rate order, collision theory and factors affecting reaction rate.


dua tingkat; miskonsepsi; tes diagnostik; diagnostic test; misconception; two-tier

Full Text:



Cetin-Dindar , A dan Omer Geban (2011). “Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students’ understanding of acids and bases”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15, 600-604.

Coll, R. K. and Taylor T. G. (2001). “Using Constructivism to Inform Tertiary Chemistry Pedagogy”. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.2, 215-226.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Tes Diagnostik. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Driver, R. (1981). “Pupil’s Alternative Frameworks in Science”. European Journal of Science Education. 3, 93-101.

Fach, M., de Boer, Tanja and Parchmann, Ilka. (2007). “Results of an Interview Study as Basis for The Development of Stepped Supporting Tools for Stoichiometric Problems”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.8(1), 13-31.

Fetherstonhaugh, T. dan Treagust, D.F. (1992). “Students’ Understanding of Light Aand Its Properties: Teaching to Engender Conceptual Change”. Sci. Edu.76, 653-672.

Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J. dan Fensham, P. J. (1982). “Children’s Science and Its Consequence for Teaching”. Science Education. 66, 623-633.

Helm, H. (1980). “Misconception in Physics amongst South African Students”. Physics Education. 15, 92-105.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). “Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions”. J. Chem. Educ.69, 191-196.

Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education. New York: Cornell University Press

Osborne, R. J., Bel

Schmidt H. J. (1997). “Students’ Misconceptions – Looking for A Pattern”. Sci. Educ.81,123-135.

Treagust, D. F. (1988). “Development and Use of Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Students Misconception in Science”. International Journal of Science. 10 No. 2, 159-169.

Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Diagnostic Assessment of Students’ Science Knowledge”. In: Glynn, S.M, Duit, R. (Eds.), “Learning Science in The Schools: Research Reforming Practice”. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 327-346.

Tüysüz, C. (2009). “Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students’ Understanding in Chemistry”. Scientific Research and Essay. 4 No 6, 626-631.

Zayeri, Allahyari, Rangi and Khosravi. (2010). Development and Evaluation of a New Questionnaire for Rating of Cognitive Failures at Work. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene. 3, (1), 6-11.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)


View JPMIPA Stats