PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH SISWA SMP

Wahyu Sukma Ginanjar, Setiya Utari, Muslim Muslim

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Argumentasi ilmiah merupakan kemampuan mengemukakan ide/gagasan mengenai fenomena sains berdasarkan data/bukti dan teori yang ada. Kemampuan ini penting dilatihkan agar siswa dapat menjelaskan fenomena sains berdasarkan bukti dan konsep sains yang relevan. Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) memiliki tahapan pembuatan argumen tentatif serta sesi argumentasi. Kedua tahapan tersebut dipandang sebagai langkah yang tepat untuk melatihkan kemampuan berargumentasi dan kualitas argumentasi. Penelitian eksploratori dengan desain time series dan melibatkan 12 siswa SMP ini bertujuan untuk menemukan cara melatihkan argumentasi pada siswa dan memperoleh gambaran peningkatan argumentasi siswa pada topik cahaya. Peningkatan argumentasi ilmiah siswa diukur berdasarkan trend peningkatan argumentasi lisan sedangkan peningkatan argumentasi tulisan dianalisis berdasarkan ADI Laboratory Report Scoring Rubric. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat trend peningkatan untuk level argumentasi 2, 4 dan 5, konstan untuk level 1 dan menurun untuk level 3, sedangkan argumentasi tulisan memiliki trend peningkatan dengan rerata nilai sebesar +2,17. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa cara-cara yang dikembangkan dalam model ADI dapat melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP pada topik cahaya.

ABSTRACT

Scientific argumentation is the ability to express ideas about science phenomena based on data and existing theories. This capability is important for students to explain scientific phenomena based on data and science concepts. Argument-Driven Inquiry model (ADI) consists of tentative argument production and argumentation session as an appropriate step to enhance student’s capability as well as the quality of their scientific argumentation. This exploratory study with time series design and 12 junior high school students as its sample was conducted in order to find ways to enhance student’s argumentation and obtain student’s argumentation enhancement on the topic of light. Students’ argumentation were measured based on oral argumentation enhacement trend, while written arguments were analyzed based on Walker's ADI Laboratory Report Scoring Rubric. Results showed an increasing trend of argumentation for level 2, 4 and 5, constant for level 1, and decreased for level 3, while the written argument has an increasing trend with the value of +2.17. These suggested that steps developed in the ADI model could enhance junior high school students’s scientific argumentation on the topic of light.


Keywords


argumentasi ilmiah; Argument-Driven Inquiry; scientific argumentation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in An Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 46, hlm. 4756-4760.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPing into Argumentation: Develop-ments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, Vol. 88 No. 6, hlm. 915-933.

Inch, E.S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 33 No. 18, hlm. 2527-2558.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Robertshaw, B. & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing Arguments: Investigating Pre-Service Science Teacher’s Argumen-tation Skills in a Socio-Scientific Context. Science Education International, Vol. 24 No. 2, hlm. 195-211.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J. & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, Vol. 95 No. 2, hlm. 217-257.

Simon, S., Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in The Science Classroom”. International Journal of Science Edu-cation, Vol. 28 No.2, hlm. 235-260.

Walker, J. P. (2011). Argumentation in Under-graduate Chemistry Laboratories. Disser-tation. The Graduate School, Florida State University, Florida.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.36195

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats