KOMPARASI KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DAN TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA SISWA SMP

Suripah Suripah

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh bukti empiris tentang keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan TPS ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan minat siswa SMP terhadap matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain completely randomized factorial design. Sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas VII dari dua sekolah yang ada di Kabupaten Kebumen. Instrumen penelitian terdiri atas tes dan angket minat yang berisi soal-soal uraian dan item pernyataan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan minat belajar siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan prestasi yang signifikan untuk kelas STADA (p= 0,046), STADB (p= 0,000), TPSA (p= 0,000), dan TPSA (p= 0,042). Pada aspek minat, kelas STAD dan TPS juga berbeda signifikan (p=0,001, ). Hasil analisis Multivariat menunjukkan bahwa terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan jenis sekolah (p=0,001 ). Dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan tipe TPS efektif ditinjau dari aspek prestasi maupun minat siswa terhadap matematika.

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to get empirical evidence about the effectiveness of STAD and TPS cooperative learning on junior high school students’ achievement and interest in mathematics. This study was a quasi-experimental research design with completely randomized factorial design. Sample were seventh grade students from two schools in Kebumen. The research instruments consisted of tests and interest questionnaire which contains questions and statement to determine the effectiveness of the learning model on students’ achievement and interest. The results showed that there was significant difference in achievement for STADA class (p = 0.046), STADB (p = 0.000), TPSA (p = 0.000), and TPSA (p = 0.042). In terms of interest, STAD and TPS significantly differed (p = 0.001, p <0.005). Multivariate analysis results show that there was interaction between learning model with the type of school (p = 0.001, p <0.005). It can be concluded that STAD and TPS cooperative learning were effective from the aspect of students' achievement and interest in mathematics.


Keywords


pembelajaran kooperatif; STAD; TPS; prestasi; minat belajar matematika; achievements; cooperative learning; interest in learning mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R.I. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Arends, R.I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: becoming an accomplished teacher. New York: Routledge.

Begle, E.G. (1997). Critical variables in mathematics education. American: Mathematical association of American.

Burden, P.R., & Byrd, D.M. (1999). Methods for effective teaching. United State of Amerika: Allyn and Bacon.

Ebel, R.I., & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essential of educational measurement (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hell, Inc.

Effandi Z., Chin, L.N., & Daud, M.Y.. (2010). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students' Mathematics: Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics Department of Methodology and Educational Practice, Faculty of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi, Selangor Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No.2, hlm. 272-275

Elliott, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., Cook, J.L., & Travers, J.F. (2000). Educationalpsychology: Effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

James, D. (2002). A creative approach to teaching methods. Dalam K. Ashcroft & D. James (Eds.). The creative professional: Learning to teach 14–19-year-olds(hlm. 49-69). London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1987). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice- Hall, INC. American.

Kemp, E.J., Morrison, R.G., & Ross, M.S. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York: Merrill.

Lie, A. (2007) Cooperative learning: mempraktekan cooperative learning di ruang-ruang kelas. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational assessment of student (5th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Sanjaya, W. (2010) Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Suryadi, R.. (2011). Perbandingan keefektifan cooperative learning tipe STAD dengan GI ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah, sikap dan minat terhadap matematika. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning, theory, research, and practice (2nd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Slavin, R.E. (2006). Education psychology, theory and practice (2nd ed). Johns Hopkins University: Pearson Education International.

Suprijono, A. (2010). Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suherman, E. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Syahrul (2011). Perbandingan keefektifan cooperative learning tipe STAD dengan TPS ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, sikap dan metode matematika siswa SMP. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Tarim, K. & Akdeniz, F. (2007). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Turkish Elementary Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics Using TAI and STAD Methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 67, hlm. 77-91.

Wantik, L. (2008). Pengaruh strategi belajar kooperatif Think-Pair-Share terhadap prestasi belajar Trigonometri siswa SMA. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Whicker, K.M., Bola, L., & Nunnery, J.A. (1997). Cooperative Learning in the Secondary dMathematics Classroom. The Journal of Educational Research Vol. 91 No.1, hlm. 42-48.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36233

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36233.g15598

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats