Email this article 
PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER BERBASIS PIKTORIAL UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan tes diagnostik two-tier berbasis piktorial yang dapat mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit, atau disebut Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit (TDM-LENON). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Development and Validation. Validasi butir soal meliputi validitas isi dan reliabilitas. Berdasarkan validitas isi, 19 butir soal dinyatakan valid dengan nilai CVR (Content Validity Ratio) untuk masing-masing butir soal sebesar 1. Berdasarkan uji reliabilitas, diperoleh 18 soal yang secara keseluruhan memiliki nilai Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,706 yang menunjukkan bahwa tes yang dikembangkan masuk ke dalam kategori dapat diterima. Butir soal yang telah memenuhi kriteria validitas isi dan reliabilitas diaplikasikan kepada 34 siswa kelas X di salah satu SMA Negeri di Kota Bandung. Berdasarkan hasil aplikasi tersebut, teridentifikasi miskonsepsi yang yang dialami siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit, dengan miskonsepsi bahwa semua elektrolit merupakan senyawa ion adalah miskonsepsi yang paling banyak terjadi (64,7%).
ABSTRACT
The aim of of this research was to develop two-tier pictorial-based diagnostics test to identify students’ misconception about the concept of electrolyte and non-electrolyte, or Diagnostics Test for Misconception about Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution (TDM-LENON). Research method was Development and Validation. Questions were validated its content validity and reliability. Based on content validity, 19 questions were deemed valid with 1 Content Validity Ratio (CVR) value. In terms of its reliability, 18 questions were deemed reliable with Cronbach’s Alpha value 0,706. All validated questions were applied to 34 students in one of Senior High Schools in Bandung. Based on this application results, students’ misconceptions regarding electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution were discovered, with misconception that all electrolyte are ionic compound was found as common misconception in the students (64,7%).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primary students’ conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid and base.Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 3 No.2, hlm. 19-26.
Carney, R.N., Levin, J.R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review Vol. 14 No.1, hlm.5-26.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F., Mocerino, M. (2007).The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice Vol. 8 No.3, hlm. 293-307.
Davetak, I., Urbancic, M., Grm, K.T.S., Krnel, D. (2004).Submicroscopic representations as a tool for evaluating students’ chemical conceptions. Acta Chim Vol. 51, hlm.799-814.
Gliem, J.A. dan Gliem, R.R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, hlm. 82-88.
Haladyna, T.M., & Rodriguez, M.C. (2013). Developing and Validating Test Items [e-book].Tersediahttp://books.google.co.id?uL5BQPFO3MC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=developing+and+validating+item+test+haladyna&ots=iCcQQLtqGj&sig=lR8AuCAGsGfYZOjUBkO8PAJ90yg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=developing%20and%20validating%20item%20test%20haladyna&f=false.[3 Juli 2015]
Johnstone, A.H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe Vol. 1 No.1, hlm. 9-15.
Kean, E., Middlecamp, C. 1985. Panduan belajar kimia dasar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personel Psycology Vol. 28, hlm.563-573.
Naah, B.M. (2012). Identifying students' misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water and using multiple-choice questions at the symbolic and particulate levels to confront misconceptions.(Disertasi).Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN.
Stojanovska,M., Petrusevski, V.M., Soptrajanov, B. (2014). Study of the use three levels of thinking and representation. Contributions, Sec. Nat. Math.Biotech.Sci., MASA Vol.35 No.1, hlm.37-46.
Tien, L.T. (2007). Effectiveness of MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Student to Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol.84 No.1, hlm.175-177.
Wu, H.K., Krajcik, J.S., Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol. 38 No.7, hlm.821-84
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36236
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats