Bibin Rubini, Indarini Dwi Pursitasari, Didit Ardianto, Haris Nugraha


The purpose of science education is to develop scientific literacy. This study investigated the effectiveness of Laboratory-Based Learning (LBL) in improving students’ scientific literacy. Samples were 70 seventh grade students in Bogor-West Java in which they were divided into two experimental groups, LBL and Non Laboratory-Based Learning (NLBL) group. Research instrument was scientific literacy test with 30 multiple choice questions about environmental pollution. Results suggested that both types of learning increase students’ scientific literacy, although LBL proved to create better scientific literacy improvement. Content and science process domain improvement for every indicator is discussed.


laboratory-based learning; laboratory works; scientific literacy; science education


Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J. & Aldrich, J.N. (2010). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?. Journal of educational Psycology, Vol. 103, No.1, hlm.1-18.

Ardianto, D. & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of Students’ Scientific Literacy in Integrated Science Learning Through Model of Guided Discovery and Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. 1, hal. 31-37

Balim, A.G. (2009). The Effect Of Discovery Learning On Student’s Success And Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, Vol.35, hlm. 1-20.

Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N. & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’science Literacy Skills dnd Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol.3, No. 2

Dam, G. & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 14, No.4, hlm. 359-379.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Grooms, J., Sampsons, V. & Golden, B. (2014). Comparing the Effectiveness of Verification and Inquiry Laboratories in Supporting Undergraduate Science Students in Constructing Arguments Around Socioscientific Issues, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 36, No. 9, 1412–1433

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, Vol. 4, No. 3, hlm. 275-288.

Holbrook, J. (2010). Education through science as a motivational innovation for science education for all, Science Education International, Vol. 21, No.2, hlm. 80-91.

Jho, H., Yoon, H.G. & Kim. K. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea, Science & Education , Vol. 23, hlm. 1131–1151

Khisfe, R. (2013). Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer, International Journal of Science Education, hlm. 1-43

Nbina, J. B. (2013). The Relative Effectiveness of Guided Discovery and Demonstration Teaching Methods on Achievement of Chemistry Students of Different levels of Scientific Literacy, Journal of Research in Education and Society, Vol. 4, No.1

Roth, W.M. & Lee, S. (2004). Science Education as/for Participation in the Community, Science Education, Vol. 88, No.2, hlm. 263-291.

Sadler, T. D. (2009). Socioscientific issues in science education: labels, reasoning, and transfer. Cultural Studies of Science Education, Vol. 4, No.3, hlm. 697-703.

Soobard, R. & Rannikmäe, M. (2011). Assessing student’s level of scientific literacy using interdisciplinary scenarios. Science Education International, Vol.22, No.2, hlm. 133-144

Swaak, J., Jong, T,D. & Joolingen, W.R. (2004). The Effect of Discovery Learning and Expository Instruction on the Acquisition of Definitional and Intuitive Knowledge, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 20, hal. 225-234

Vaille Dawson and Katherine Carson. (2016).Using climate change scenarios to assess high school students’ argumentation skills, Research in science & Technological education, hlm. 1-16



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

View JPMIPA Stats