THE INFLUENCE OF INTEGRATED AND SEPARATE TRAINING ON STUDENTS’ META-AFFECTIVE DURING SCIENCE LEARNING

Lilit Rusyati, Nuryani Y. Rustaman, Ari Widodo, Minsu Ha

Abstract


Affective dimension is one that must be assessed. Unfortunately, there is no learning that teaches students specifically how to recognize and control affective. Therefore, this study provides training to students on meta-affective strategies during science learning. The Static-group pretest-posttest design was chosen as the research method because it compares integrated training (facilitated by the teacher) and separate training (independent by students). MATS (Meta-Affective Trait Scale) questionnaire was adapted by adding 34 statements so that the total number is 51 statements. There were two experimental groups, each consisting of 50 students. Statistical tests show that there is no difference in students' meta-affective in integrated training and separate training. However, analysis per statement showed that separate training were better at recognizing and regulating meta-affective. In addition, in both integrated training and separate training, it is equally difficult to reduce negative emotions. This result implies that science learning should also focus on the affective and teacher should not give negative labels to students.


Keywords


integrated training, separate training, science learning, students’ meta-affective

References


Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2019). Academic emotional learning: A critical component of self-regulated learning in the emotional learning cycle. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 84–10.

Bennett, P. A. (2018). Affective factors in learner autonomy. Relay Journal, 1(1), 128–132.

Daher, W., Sabbah, K., & Abuzant, M. (2021). Affective engagement of higher education students in an online course. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 545–558.

DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147.

Dehghani, Y., Golestaneh, S. M., & Zangouei, S. (2018). The effectiveness of emotion regulation training on academic burnout, social acceptance and affective control of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(2), 163–182.

Do, J., & Paik, S. (2018). Aspects of meta-affect according to mathematics learning achievement level in problem-solving processes. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 22(2), 143–159.

Do, J., & Paik, S. (2019). Analysis of characteristics from meta-affect viewpoint on problem-solving activities of mathematically gifted children. The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 519–530.

Endah, E., Zulfiani, Z., & Herlanti, Y. (2018). The role of metacognitive learning strategy in developing students’ academic self-concept and learning achievement. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 23(1), 1-12.

Enneking, K. M., Breitenstein, G. R., Coleman, A. F., Reeves, J. H., Wang, Y., & Grove, N. P. (2019). The evaluation of a hybrid, general chemistry laboratory curriculum: Impact on students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1058–1067.

Favre, P., Kanske, P., Engen, H., & Singer, T. (2021). Decreased emotional reactivity after 3-month socio-affective but not attention-or meta-cognitive-based mental training: A randomized, controlled, longitudinal fMRI study. NeuroImage, 237(1), 1–15.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., and Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, Eighth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gasah, M., Baharum, A., Zain, N. H. M., Halamy, S., Hanapi, R., & Noor, N. A. M. (2020). Evaluation of positive emotion in children mobile learning application. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(2), 818–826.

He, X., & Zhang, W. (2018). Emotion recognition by assisted learning with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing, 291(1), 187–194.

Høglend, P., & Hagtvet, K. (2019). Change mechanisms in psychotherapy: Both improved insight and improved affective awareness are necessary. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(4), 332–344.

Järvelä, S., Gašević, D., Seppänen, T., Pechenizkiy, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2391–2406.

Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2021). How does a flipped classroom course affect the affective domain toward science course?. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 707-719.

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2019). Examining the mediating effect of science self-efficacy on the relationship between metavariables and science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 995-1014.

Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 168–182.

Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112.

Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 339–359.

Ponto, H. (2022). The Effect of affective domain-based teaching on theoretical and practical outcomes of learning the basics of electricity at vocational high schools in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal on Integrated Education, 5(6), 8-20.

Putranta, H., & Jumadi, J. (2019). Physics teacher efforts of Islamic high school in Yogyakarta to minimize students’ anxiety when facing the assessment of physics learning outcomes. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 119–136.

Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2019). “It’s scary but it’s also exciting”: Evidence of meta-affective learning in science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 73–92.

Ramma, Y., Bholoa, A., Watts, M., & Nadal, P. S. (2018). Teaching and learning physics using technology: Making a case for the affective domain. Education Inquiry, 9(2), 210-236.

Rusyati, L., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Ha, M. (2021). The interconnection between students’ meta-affective, meta-cognitive and achievement in science learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 566(1), 200-201.

Sertdemir, İ. (2022). Intuitive learning in moral awareness. cognitive-affective processes in Mencius’ Innatist theory. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 13(25), 235–254.

Sumintono, B. (2018). Contextual learning in environmental education program and students’ attitude on health effects of mercury: A Rasch modeling analysis. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 23(2), 1-12.

Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2019). Modeling relationships of affective and metacognitive factors on grade eleven students’ mathematics achievement.

International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 295–308.

Uyun, M., & Warsah, I. (2022). Prospective teachers’ intercultural sensitivity alongside the contextual factors as the affective domain to realize multicultural education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 555-576.

Uzuntiryaki‐Kondakci, E., & Kirbulut, Z. D. (2016). The development of the meta‐affective trait scale. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 359–374.

Widyantari, N. K. S., Suardana, I. N., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Pengaruh strategi belajar kognitif, metakognitif dan sosial afektif terhadap hasil belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 2(2), 151-160.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v27i2.50835

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats