Exit Exams Pre, During, and Post Exam Administration Procedures in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

Samson Worku Teshome

Abstract


Exit exams in higher education are a critical tool for assessing student competency and readiness for the workforce. However, the procedures surrounding their administration—pre, during, and post-exam—play a significant role in their effectiveness and acceptance among stakeholders. This systematic review synthesizes the literature on exit exam administration procedures in higher education, focusing on their design, implementation, and outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of electronic databases yielded 22 studies for inclusion. The findings reveal that pre-exam procedures, such as preparation and communication, significantly impact student performance and stress levels. During-exam procedures, including exam format and proctoring, influence fairness and integrity, while post-exam procedures, such as feedback and result dissemination, affect student satisfaction and institutional accountability. The review highlights the need for standardized, transparent, and inclusive administration procedures to ensure the effectiveness of exit exams. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of these procedures on student outcomes and institutional practices.

Keywords


During exam procedurs; Exam administration; Exit exams; Higher education; Post-exam procuders; Pre-exam producers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackeren, M., Van Damme, J., and Onghena, P. (2012). The impact of exit exams on educational standards: A case study from Germany. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 123-138.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364.

Bracey, G. W. (2009). Mandatory exit exams: Do they discourage graduation? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(8), 567-571.

Cook, K. S., Fogelberg, K., Butterbrodt, P., Jolley, K., Raghavan, M., and Smith, J. R. (2023). Assessing student learning: Exams, quizzes, and remediation. Educational Principles and Practice in Veterinary Medicine, 10, 287-312.

El-Hassan, H., Hamouda, M., El-Maaddawy, T., and Maraqa, M. (2021). Curriculum-based exit exam for assessment of student learning. European journal of engineering education, 46(6), 849-873.

Ford, D. Y., and Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(3), 141-147.

Medina, C., and Rufín, R. (2015). Transparency policy and students’ satisfaction and trust. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(3), 309-323.

Pressley, M., Gaskins, I. W., Solic, K., and Collins, S. (2006). A portrait of benchmark school: How a school produces high achievement in students who previously failed. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 282.

Rodeiro, C. V., and Macinska, S. (2023). Teachers' and students' views of access arrangements in high stakes examinations. Research Matters, 35, 41-59.

Salto, D. J. (2018). To profit or not to profit: the private higher education sector in Brazil. Higher Education, 75(5), 809-825.

Saunders, P., and Scialfa, C. T. (2003). The effects of pre-exam instruction on students' performance on an effective writing exam. Written Communication, 20(2), 195-212.

Weir, C. J. (2010). Pretest/posttest assessment and the role of feedback in exit exams. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(2), 123-138.

Yanisky-Ravid, S., and Hallisey, S. K. (2019). Equality and privacy by design: A new model of artificial intelligence data transparency via auditing, certification, and safe harbor regimes. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 46, 428.

Zhao, L., Peng, J., Yang, X., Yan, W., Ke, S., Dong, L. D., Yaxin, L., and Lee, K. (2023). Effects of honor code reminders on university students’ cheating in unproctored exams: A double-blind randomized controlled field study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, 102213.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v5i1.82812

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats
Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology (IJERT) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)