Strategi Penyelenggaraan Praktikum dan Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan di Program Studi Sarjana Teknik Elektro

Muhammad Amin Sulthoni


Every semester, Basic Laboratory of Electrical Engineering (LDTE), School of Electrical and Informatics Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology is targeted to serve around 370 students from three study programs who take an average of two practicum subjects from the seven practicum subjects held. This paper describes various strategies and tactical steps that are applied in managing educational laboratories that must manage a large capacity practicum effectively and efficiently, while maintaining good quality. Surveys from student participants show that the laboratory and practicum management at LDTE has gone well and satisfactorily.


laboratorium pendidikan; manajemen pengelolaan; praktikum


Bidang Akademik dan Kemahasiswaan ITB. (2013). Dokumen Kurikulum 2013-2018 Program Sarjana Program Studi Teknik Elektro.

Norrie S. Edward. (2002). The Role of Laboratory Work in Engineering Education: Student and Staff Perceptions. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Educa-tion Vol. 39(1), pp 11-19. DOI:10.7227/IJEEE.39.1.2

Romanas V. Krivickas & Jonas Krivickas. (2007). Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Educa-tion. Global J. of Engng. Educ., Vol.11, No.2.

E. W. Ernst. (1983). A New Role for the Undergraduate Engineering Laboratory. IEEE Trans-actions on Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 49-51. DOI: 10.1109/TE.1983.4321598.

H. E. P. Tattje and H. Vos. (1995). Improvement of a laboratory course in network analysis: learning to validate knowledge in an experimental way. IEEE Transactions on Educa-tion, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 17-26. DOI: 10.1109/13.350216.

Lyle D. Feisell and Albert J. Rosa. (2005). The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engi-neering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, pp 121-130 DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x

Brian Surgenor and Kevin Firth. (2011). The Role of the Laboratory in Design Engineering Education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). DOI: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3848

Selim Coskun, Yasanur Kayıkcı, and Eray Gençay. (2019). Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies Vol 7, 10. DOI:10.3390/technologies7010010

Nandana, W.A.R. and de Mel, W.R. (2016). Integrated laboratory experiment setup to em-power the engineering education in distance mode. Asian Association of Open Uni-versities Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp 13-23. DOI: 10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2016-0007

Dekan STEI ITB. (2020). SK Dekan STEI ITB No 3199/IT1.C12/SK-DA/2020 tentang daya tam-pung STEI ITB tahun 2020/2021.

Kim Henige. (2010). Undergraduate student attitudes and perception toward low- and high-level inquiry exercise physiology teaching laboratory experiences. Adv. Physiol. Educ. Vol 35, pp 197-205. DOI:10.1152//advan.00086.2010

International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems – Requirements.

M H Habibie & R H Kresiani. (2019). Implementation of PDCA Cycle in Calibration and Test-ing Laboratory Based on ISO/IEC 17025:2017. IOP Conference Series: Materials Sci-ence and Engineering, Vol. 598, Annual Conference on Industrial and System Engi-neering (ACISE) 2019

Agung Wahyu Setiawan dan Astri Handayani. (2020). Wawancara tentang pengelolaan prak-tikum Teknik Biomedika ITB.

Mohamad Z, Yasin RM, Rahman MNA. (2012). Laboratory Quality Management Require-ments of Engineering at the Polytechnics Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.6 (1) pp. 59-64.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan

ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
hit counter
View My Stats