The Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) on Argumentation Skills and Students' Concept Mastering of Human Excretory System Materials
Abstract
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046
Adriani, Y., & Riandi. (2015). Meningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiri pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Di SMP Kelas VII [Improving Students' Mastery of Concepts Through Argument Driven Inquiry Learning in Integrated Science Learning in Class VII Junior High Schools}. Edusains, 7(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1578
Akhmalia, N. L., Maharta, N., & Suana, W. (2018). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis LMS dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa [The Effectiveness of LMS-Based Blended Learning with Inquiry Learning Models on Static Fluid Material on Students' Mastery of Concepts]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.299
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Aprilanti, H., Qurbaniah, M., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Sistem Eksresi Manusia Kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 4 Pontianak.[Identification of Students' Misconceptions on the Material of the Human Excretion System for Class XI MIA SMA Negeri 4 Pontianak]. Jurnal Biologi Edukation, 3(2), 63–77.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.) [Fundamentals of Educational Evaluation (2nd ed.)]. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Bekiroglu, F. O., & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1415–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9346-z
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446
Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2010). Biologi (W. Hardani & P. Andhika (eds.); 8th ed.). Penerbit Ernangga.
Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324
Divena, M. S., Hamdiyati, Y., & Aryani, A. (2021). Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) on students’ concept mastery and argumentation skills in reproductive system. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20513
Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
Ekanara, B. (2014). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA (Studi tentang Keterampilan Pembentukan Klaim Mengenai Isu Sosio-Saintifik SMA pada Kelompok Budaya Sunda) [Argumentation Skills of High School Students (Study of Claim Formation Skills Concerning High School Socio-Scientific Issues in Sundanese Cultural Groups)]. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui Pbl (Problem Based Learning) [The Relationship between Reasoning Ability and Students' Argumentation Skills on the Concept of the Digestive System through PBL (Problem Based Learning)]. Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Eymur, G. (2019). The influence of the explicit nature of science instruction embedded in the Argument-Driven Inquiry method in chemistry laboratories on high school students’ conceptions about the nature of science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00135a
Farida, L., Undang, R. & Hasnunidah, N. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran argumentdriven inquiry (adi) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa smp berdasarkan perbedaan jenis kelamin [The effect of applying the argument driven inquiry (ADI) learning model to the argumentation skills of junior high school students based on gender differences]. Journal of Physics and Science Learning, 2(2), 25-36.
Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa melalui Action Research dengan Fokus Tindakan Think Pair Share. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253–259.
Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Dorfner, T., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). Effects of Cognitive Activation in Biology Lessons on Students’ Situational Interest and Achievement. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9517-y
Harianto, Y. (2018). Analisis pengaruh penguasaan konsep dan literasi kuantitatif terhadap kualitas argumentasi siswa pada materi sistem koordinasi [Analysis of the influence of concept mastery and quantitative literacy on the quality of students' arguments in the coordination system material]. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).
Jayawardana, H. B. A. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Guided Inquiry terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA N 2 Banguntapan [The Effect of Applying the Guided Inquiry Method to the Activities and Results of Biology Class X Students of SMA N 2 Banguntapan]. Jurnal BIoedukatika, 3(2), 1–8.
Kadayifci, H., & Yalcin-Celik, A. (2016). Implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry as an Instructional Model in a General Chemistry Laboratory Course. Science Education International, 27(3), 369–390.
Kaunang, S. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dengan Metode Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar [Application of Contextual Learning with Inquiry Methods to Increase Motivation and Learning Outcomes]. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 4(1), 69–78.
Lu, S., Bi, H., & Liu, X. (2018). The effects of explanation-driven inquiry on students’ conceptual understanding of redox. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1857-1873.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication : The Process , Barriers , And Improving Effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1–11.
Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang [Application of the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Improving Students' Arguing Ability on the Concept of Environmental Pollution in Class X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang]. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(2), 39–45.
McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430
Muhiddin, S. M. A. (2015). Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Pencemaran Lingkungan dengan Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa SMP [Integrated Science Learning on Environmental Pollution with Argument-Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentative Ability and Curiosity of Junior High School Students.]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Muslim. (2011). Implementasi inovasi pembelajaran ipa berbasis inkuiri untuk menumbuh kembangkan keterampilan proses sains dan sikap ilmiah siswa melaui lesson study [Implementation of inquiry-based science learning innovations to develop students' science process skills and scientific attitudes through lesson study]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 16(2), 99–108.
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen [Mastery of Concepts and Arguing Ability of Middle School Students in Science Learning with Argument-Based Inquiry]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Erduran, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Paidi, P. (2020). Students’ Competence in Cognitive Process and Knowledge in Biology Based on Curriculum Used in Indonesia. International Journal of Intruction, 13(3), 491–510.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Rendhana, I. wayan. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia [Developing 21st Century Skills in Chemistry Learning]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.17824
Ruhulessin, S., Ratumanan, T. G., & Tamalene, H. (2019). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Sma Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Facilitator and Explaining (Sfe) Dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional Pada Materi Trigonometri [Differences in Student Facilitator and Explaining (Sfe) Class X High School Cooperative Learning Models and Conventional Learning Models in Trigonometry Material]. JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol2iss1pp1-6
Safira, C. A., Hasnunidah, N., & Sikumbang, D. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda [The Effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Learning Model on the Argumentation Skills of Students with Different Academic Abilities]. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i2.13046
Salsabila, E. R., Wijaya, A. F. C., Winarno, N., & Hanif, S. (2019). Using argument-driven inquiry to promote students’ concept mastery in learning global warming. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032052
Sampson, V., & Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.7.7
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). in Biology ARTICLE Argument-Driven Inquiry To Promote AB ? of the Understanding Important Concepts & Practices O ? ... students need THE AMERICAN ARGUMENT-DRIVEN. October, 71(8), 465–472.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Gleim, L., Grooms, J., Hester, M., Shoutherland, S., & Wilson, K. (2014). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Biology: Lab Investigations for Grades 9-12 (K. Reinburg, W. Rubin, A. Cooke, A. O’Brien, & A. America (eds.)). National Science Teacher Associations. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jONrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=Writing+to+Learn+by+Learning+to+Write+During+the+School+Science+Laboratory:+Helping+Middle+and+High+School+Students+Develop+Argumentative+Writing+Skills+as+They+Learn+Core+Ideas&source=b
Saracaloglu, A. S., Aktamis, H., & Delioglu, Y. (2011). The impact of the development of prospective teachers’ critical thinking skills on scientific argumentation training and on their ability to construct an argument. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 243–260.
Sari, R. A., Musthafa, B., & Yusuf, F. N. (2021). Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa. [Argument Driven Inquiry Learning on Temperature and Heat Materials to Improve Students ’ Scientific Argumentation Ability]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.37134
Shanmugavelu, G., Parasuraman, B., Ariffin, K., Kannan, B., & Vadivelu, M. (2020). Inquiry Method in the Teaching and Learning Process. Shanlax: International Journal of Education, 8(3), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v8i3.2396
Sumiyati, S., Yeni, L. F., & Marlina, R. (2016). Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Sub Materi Spermatophyta Kelas X [The Influence of the Inquiry Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Class X Spermatophyta Sub Material]. (Doctoral dissertation, Tanjungpura University).
Supriyati, E., Setyawati, O. I., Purwanti, D. Y., Salsabila, L. S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Swasta di Sragen Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi [Profile of Critical Thinking Skills of Private High School Students in Sragen on Reproductive System Material]. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 74–80.
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Ubaque Casallas, D. F., & Pinilla Castellanos, F. S. (2016). Argumentation skills: A peer assessment approach to discussions in the EFL classroom. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 18(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53314
Utomo, Y. S., Ashadi, & Sarwanto. (2019). Argumentation Skills Profile on 8th Grade Students using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern on Controversial topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 0–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012095
Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry: An introduction to a new instructional model for use in undergraduate chemistry labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100622h
Widodo, A. (2006). Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal [Bloom's Taxonomy and Item Development]. Buletin Puspendik, 3(2), 18–29.
Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Dasar-Dasar Untuk Praktik [Natural Science Learning: Fundamentals For Practice] (M. Iriany (ed.); 1st ed.). UPI PRESS.
Yolanda, S. E., Gunawan, G., & Sutrio, S. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Video Kontekstual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik [The Effect of Contextual Video Assisted Guided Inquiry Learning Models on Students' Mastery of Physics Concepts]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i2.1393.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.54634
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Vita Riyanti, Yanti Hamdiyati, Widi Purwianingsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia