Muhamad Nova, Westi Haryanti Utami


As one of the negative impacts of technology development, the easy access to any information on the internet creates a new problem on academic integrity, in which the students take other’s works and claim as theirs. This phenomenon is termed as plagiarism which is against the academic ethics and honesty. Many universities have fought back the plagiarism cases and used plagiarism detection software as their tools in detecting plagiarism. Turnitin, as one of plagiarism detection software widely used in many universities, has been claimed as effective software in detecting plagiarism. However, prior studies have also revealed its inaccuracy in dealing with plagiarism cases. Reflecting from the both views of Turnitin, students’ view on its utilization may bring an essential consideration on the existence of Turnitin in detecting plagiarism. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the utilization of Turnitin based on students’ perspective and explored their responses and perceptions toward plagiarism detected by Turnitin. A case study was conducted in one classroom consisted of 20 EFL students in a university in Bandung, Indonesia. The data were taken from self-reflection questionnaire and the result shows that many students had unexpected results due to their misunderstanding about plagiarism and Turnitin system. It led to students’ unsatisfying responses toward their result of similarity percentage from Turnitin. Even though several benefits on writing skill improvement were found by the students, the inaccuracy result of Turnitin evaluation raised their negative attitude toward its utilization as well. Therefore, equal understanding between the lecturer and the students on plagiarism and Turnitin system is needed. Moreover, lecturer’s cross-checking, feedback on students’ academic writing, and additional change on the system configuration in detecting plagiarism are required to avoid any misconception of plagiarism. Further research on different respondents or different plagiarism detection software is recommended to be conducted.


academic writing; EFL students; perception; plagiarism; Turnitin

Full Text:



Ali, H. I. H. (2013). Minimizing cyber-plagiarism through Turnitin: Faculty's & students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(2), 33-42.

Bakhtiyari, K., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Shakiba, M., Zavvari, A., Shahbazi-Moghadam, M., Ebrahim, N. A., & Mohammadjafari, M. (2014). Ethical and unethical methods of plagiarism prevention in academic writing. International Education Studies, 7(7), 52-62.

Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.

Bensal, E. R., Miraflores, E. S., & Tan, N. C. C. (2013). Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin? CALL-EJ, 14(2), 2-22.

Bretag, T., & Carapiet, S. (2007). A preliminary study to identify the extent of self-plagiarism in Australian academic research. Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 2(5), 1‐12.

Bruton, S., & Childers, D. (2015). The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: A qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin®. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 316-330.

Crisp, G. T. (2007). Staff attitudes to dealing with plagiarism issues: Perspectives from one Australian university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 3(1), 3-15.

Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173-191.

Goh, E. (2013). Plagiarism behavior among undergraduate students in hospitality and tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 13(4), 307-322.

Graham-Matheson, L., & Starr, S. (2013). Is it cheating or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13.

Hamilton, M. & Richardson, J. (2008). Academic integrity compliance and education. Proceedings of ASCILITE Melbourne 2008 (pp. 382-388).

Jones, K. O. (2008). Practical issues for academics using the Turnitin plagiarism detection software. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies 2008, 1-5.

Kaner, C. & Fiedler, R. L. (2007). A cautionary note on checking software engineering papers for plagiarism. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(2), 184-188.

Ledwith, A., & Rísquez, A. (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371-384.

Nisha, F., Senthil, V., & Bushan, G. (2015). Perils of plagiarism and its cure. Proceedings of ETD 2015: 18th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 206-213.

Oghigian, K., Rayner, M., & Chujo, K. (2015). A quantitative evaluation of Turnitin from an L2 science and engineering perspective. CALL-EJ, 17(1), 1-18.

Ranawella, T. C., & Alagaratnam, V. (2017). Research ethics and anti-plagiarism software: A study on Turnitin users of General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University (KDU). Proceedings of Information Use and User Studies, 347-350.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i2.8605


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Muhamad Nova, Westi Haryanti Utami

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.