A Qualitative Study on the Use of the Concepts and Subjects of Life Sciences in Religion Courses

Selma Eminoğlu, Mehmet Akif Haşıloğlu, Bülent Keskin

Abstract


This study aims at determining the science concepts and subjects used in the "religion courses" taught in secondary schools and the contribution of science to religion courses, which is not a widely studied topic in the relevant literature. Like qualitative research, this study is a multiple case study. The data were collected using a semi-structured interview with five Muslim religion teachers working in an eastern city of Turkey. The interview data were analyzed using the basic descriptive and content analysis methods. The findings showed that religion teachers benefit from the concepts and subjects of science in their courses; using life sciences in their religion courses had a positive impact in teaching religious subjects better to the students; the use of the concepts of life sciences in religion courses enabled students to perceive the subject better; students enjoyed the use of science concepts in religion courses and also students asked questions to their teachers about many subjects of life sciences. Religion teachers expressed that they did not feel competent enough in the life sciences. Some recommendations, such as organizing in-service training have been made for religion teachers to feel competent enough in life sciences.


Keywords


beliefs; secondary school students; muslim; religious education; science education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, N. (2020). Integrating Science and Religion in the Curriculum of Indonesian Islamic Higher Education: A Case Study of UIN Malang. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(9), 948-960.

Arslantaş, B. (2006). Elementary 4th Grade Physical Education Courses in the Teaching Model Based on Interdisciplinary Approach to Teaching Basic Skills an Application of football. (Unpublished master's thesis), Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Aybek, B. (2001). Interdisciplinary (integrated) teaching approach. Journal of Educational Research, 3, 1-7.

Bakırcı, H., & Çepni, S. (2014). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı Temelinde Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin İrdelenmesi [Examination Of Common Knowledge Configuration Model Based On Science Course Curriculum]. Journal Of Science Education, 2(2), 83-94.

Barnes, C. R. (1906). The contribution of science to religious education. The Biblical World, 28(5), 313-318.

Başkurt, İ. (2008). Reading the Universe Correctly for a Balanced World: An Islamic View on Human and the Universe. International Symposium on Environment and Religion 2. Yalın Publishing, 15-30, Istanbul.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2009). Scientific Research Methods (3rd edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Cluck, N. A. (1980). Reflections in the interdisciplinary approach to the humanities. Liberal Education, 66(1), 67-77.

Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. A teacher's guide.

Ekiz, D. (2009). Scientific Research Methods (Developed 2. Edition). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Eminoğlu, S. (2016). Din eğitiminde fen bilimleri kavram ve konularının kullanılması. [The Usage of Science Concepts And Topics In Education of Religion] (Unpublished master's thesis), Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Ağrı, Turkey.

Freathy, R., & John, H.C. (2019). Religious Education, Big Ideas and the study of religion(s) and worldview(s). British Journal of Religious Education, 41(1), 27-40, DOI:10.1080/01416200.2018.1500351

Gülçür, K. M. (2013). Relation of Religion and Science. Yeni Umut Religious Studies and Culture Journal, 101(1), 17-21.

Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The Inter-relationship of Science and Religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210-1229.

İşler, A.Ş. (2004). Interdisciplinary thematic approach in Art Education. National Education Journal, 163, 43-54.

Karatay, R, Timur, S., & Timur, B. (2013). 2005 ve 2013 Yılı Fen Dersi Öğretim Programlarının Karşılaştırılması [Comparison of 2005 And 2013 Science Course Curricula]. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences], 15, 233-264.

Kayadibi, F. (2008). Religion in the face of environmental problems. International Symposium on Environment and Religion 1, Yayın Publishing, 279-288, Istanbul.

Kline, S.J., (1995). Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford University Pres, Stanford.

Leonov, Y.G. (2011). Religion-science-education. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 81(2), 157-167.

Loving, C. C., & Foster, A. (2000). The religion‐in‐the‐science‐classroom issue: Seeking graduate student conceptual change. Science Education, 84(4), 445-468.

Ministry of National Education. (2012). Primary and Secondary School Science and Technology Course (6-8th Graders) Curriculum. Ankara: Ministry of National Education, Education and Training Board Presidency Publications.

Nord, W. A. (1999). Science, religion and education. Religion & Education, 26(2), 55-66.

Rodriguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 19-37.

Saban, A., & Ersoy, A. (2017). Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri. [Qualitative research patterns in education] Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Saka, S. (2014). A Comparison of Common Values in Science and Technology Lesson and Religion Culture and Ethic Education Course Curriculum. (Unpublished master's thesis), Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.

Shane, J.W. (2019). An Evolving Interdisciplinary Honors Seminar on Science and Religion. Honors in Practice, 15, 79-94.

Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325-351.

Stake, R.E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Taber, K. S. (2013). The relationship between science and religion–A contentious and complex issue facing science education. Science education: A global perspective. Abuja, Nigeria: Next Generation Education Ltd.

Tarhan, N. (2012). Journey from Mental to the Heart: Bediüzzaman Model (1st edition). İstanbul: Nesil Typography.

Turna, Ö., & Bolat, M., (2015). Eğitimde Disiplinler arası Yaklaşımın Kullanıldığı Tezlerin Analizi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1), 35-55.

Vikdahl, V. (2019) A lot is at stake: On the possibilities for religion-related dialog in a school in Sweden. Religion & Education, 46(1), 81-100, DOI:10.1080/15507394.2019.1577713.

Yalçın, P., & Yıldırım, H. (1998). An application on interdisciplinary teaching. Çanakkale University Education Faculty Journal, 17, 146-150.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i3.29183

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2020 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats